this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
644 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nice try, I ain't gonna pay anyway

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly, I just keep using the free plan and when I finish the amount for the day I just switch to another service

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is why IMO blitz scaling is dumb when your service is a commodity. I'm not any more loyal to Uber than Skip. If more investor money goes into making a cheaper meal or ride on Skip I use that. Consumers are mercenaries about that stuff.

The "blitz" part of blitz scaling assumes your customers can't move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WPSteam@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

AI Bubble burst coming sooner?

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, this is no different than Walmart making prices low until other businesses die out and then raising them.

It is no different than police shoving all the homeless people and drug addicts into one area of town to crash the property prices, and then evicting them once developers buy everything for cheap.

They're purposely operating at a loss in the expectation that they can get ingrained into a ton of workflows, and then gouge everyone absolutely to death while also worsening the quality of the service to make it cheaper for them to run.

If it weren't so horrible for the environment, I'd kind of like it, because all the dumbass executives that are signing up for this are going to get exactly what they deserve. You'd think they'd recognize a scheme when they see one.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My CEO (whom I don't consider a particularly good or bad CEO) spent a day playing with AI then when asked if he'd sign the company up with the service he literally laughed in their faces and said it's useless. I was honestly shocked because he's totally into buzzword and popular crap. Gained a lot of respect for him that day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how much they spend for every $0 I pay them.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

$1000 I would guess. They are just burning money at this point.

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 153 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Of course it is, it’s essentially a scam. They just need enough humans to keep investing until they check out and run with a bailout.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 55 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Funny thing is, the US government doesn't even have nearly enough money to bail all these mfa out. So we are heading into uncharted territory here

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Of course they don’t, that’s why they’re building bunkers. Thinking it’ll slow us down, as we’ll open their bunkers like cans of tuna. A bunker only works for so long, then the survivors start hunting for them like delicious shipwrecks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago

And that's why they're trying underhanded tactics to inflate earnings and IPO directly into the index funds, so every American's 401K will legally have to rebalance and invest in them. They're racing to fleece retirement funds before the bubble bursts.

Not financial advice, of course :p but people should really consider getting their stuff out and into self-directed funds or whatever it is US people do to not depend on auto-allocated funds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Trust me bro we're so close to profitability bro, just need this IPO to secure funding one last time bro then we'll be profitable bro I swear.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I can't imagine paying for AI when the open source tools have made it so easy to set up a model locally.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't be daft. The vast majority of people don't have the knowledge or resources to set that up locally.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right if we're talking about the entire population of Earth. With these local models though, other people have already done all the hard stuff. Anyone with an RTX card and just a minimum level of patience can get going.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Easy to set up, but still needs a 15k $ graphics card and electricity bill. The price you pay openai/anthropic is much cheaper than that for that quality of model.

Sure, you can setup a small model on a consumer graphics card, but the output will be considerably worse and the processing speed considerably lower.

For 240€/year you got a subscription to anthropic which will happily ingest a whole repository and process it in about one minute. No matter what latest model GPU you installed on your computer, you won't be able to do that.

Sure, this guy was able to run a 26B model on an old CPU: https://point.free/blog/gemma-4-on-a-2016-xeon/

But that was not easy at all and the speed you get is definitely not the same as the one provided for a very cheap price.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you were paying the real price it would be 2 grand a year though. And in 5 years that 15k graphics card will be $200 and sip on electricity by comparison.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 88 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

reminder than during 2019 there were streaming services popping left and right, all showing tremendous growth because they started from zero, and articles were about how bad Netflix was doing due to having practically no growth compared with the competition (they already had a massive subscriber base). Twist? Netflix was the only streaming service that was actually making a profit, the rest were a massive loss but big growth.

Needless to say most of those streaming services died; who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo's? While Netflix is basically as stong as ever, despite the prevalent enshitification happening through the whole industry.

Point of the story? shareholders don't care about stable profitable business, only cancerous growth. AI is like that, zero profits, ton of cost, but as long as they show growth the shareholders are happy, regardless of how cooked the books are.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

2019 Yahoo

My immediate thought, there is no way Yahoo! Screen survived into 2019.

I looked it up and Yahoo! Screen (which featured Community season 6) was shutdown in January 2016. But Yahoo! View launched in late 2016 (as a Hulu-like replacement), and that did shutter in mid 2019.

So Yahoo! was already dead, but it also died for real in 2019.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine having a streaming service so bad it fails twice

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Isn't that kind of Yahoo!'s business model?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I love that nobody watched anything on Yahoo! Screen except for that one season of Community

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 39 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Honestly Google is likely to beat openAI and Anthropic as things are.

OpenAI and Anthropic have to buy/rent their hardware from Nvidia, while Google is making their own TPU hardware. Google's hardware costs on AI is way lower, every dollar they spend on it goes a lot farther.

And unlike the other two, they're already a profitable company. They're making record profits right now. They don't have a desperate need to figure out how to make back billions on their AI models, they can just keep offering Gemini at a comparatively cheap price and wait for anthropic and open AI to bankrupt themselves.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Now, I'm no MBA, but that seems like a bad business plan...

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What is the actual “cost” after they buy the hardware, is that $1000 really pure power usage cost?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that the hardware has a 5 or 6 year depreciation schedule on paper, but NVIDIA keeps saying that their next generation chip will be twice as good as their last chip so there is a FOMO schedule of like every two years.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Would be nice to see that used hardware for sale rather than it being junked as a writeoff.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's gonna come crashing down pretty soon. It's gonna hurt all of us. It won't hurt the people responsible nearly enough.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

pretty soon

people have been saying that for some time though

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good thing I don't personally pay them anything

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, you are going to pay. The bubble is going to fuck us all quite thoroughly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

they are spending infinite money for every $1 i pay them

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

I'm quite happy to use their compute power for frivolous bullshit if it hastens their enshittification and demise.

"Hey Claude, can you begin work on an e-commerce site written in visual basic?"

*Two microseconds later... *

"Your free usage limit has been reached"

"Ok Claude see you tomorrow, maybe we'll think about a rewrite in Turbo Pascal"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Oh come on bubble, why won't you crash already?

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so these crazy prices i hear about being implemented (like at github) should actually be at least 10x higher?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

10x higher to break even :)

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To break even on operating expenses, not even counting debt payments, depreciated capital value, or future recapitalization costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 days ago

The author is right and wrong. Its subsidised but not by anthropic. The power users who use their plans to the limit are subsidised by the rest of the users. Im an AI hater but I do think anthropic will be profitable next year. Their revenue growth is insane and looks to just be getting started. Claude code took enterprise by storm and now cowork is out.

load more comments
view more: next ›