this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
492 points (99.2% liked)

Just billionaire things

368 readers
1 users here now

Post things your (least) fav billionaire does.

This used to be the Elon Musk sub, but in an attempt to boost engagement, we have engaged a new pathway.

You can post anything related to billionaires here.

Tags: Tesla, paypal, spaceX, neuralink, The Boring Company.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 125 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bezos is right. Double of nothing is... nothing.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that he said that with that very thought in mind. Like a thinly veiled fuck you to the non-Epstein class.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

how can we forget, zuckerberg, thiel , BEZOS and several other billionaires were having DINNER at one of epstein estate one time.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

But not Musk because he's too thirsty and weird for the pack of societal-eroding pedos

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 87 points 4 months ago

Technically true.

2 x $0 = $0

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 68 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Double? These assholes really don't know how close they are to being lynched in their own mansions

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 61 points 4 months ago (1 children)

doubles his taxes

Bezos continues to pay $0 in taxes

Was going to say this, he's technically right because he pays so little in taxes to begin with. I am honestly more of a believer in a flat tax for the rich now than progressive tax structure. But they'd find some way to weasel out of it so there's only one solution to them.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 57 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like we should nationalize Amazon. That's what he's saying, right?

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We really could just do that. He and others would fight like hell, but why couldn't it be done? It needs to be done.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Supposedly most of their profits come from AWS, so they wouldn't even stop making money if the marketplace was nationalized.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 12 points 4 months ago

Honestly a nationalised AWS would be a way bigger boon to the economy, and he could go back to cornering the market on diapers or whatever fuck him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

That's what i heard.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It should be sold to the public as free market competition.

"We are taking over Amazon because government is inefficient and wasteful. This will allow American small business ingenuity to crush the government Amazon and replace it with a free market alternative."

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

You could take 90% of his wealth and he’d still have more than 99.999% of the rest of the country.

He didn’t earn that money. He’s just a squatter making money on everyone else’s work. Stfu you whiner, Bezos.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"I promise you" is billionaire speak for "fuck you and fuck your family"

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

He's right though. Double of nothing is...

Nothing

[–] Zink@programming.dev 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The guy with all the money says that other people getting some of the money wouldn't help them.

And in the US a huge number of people just nod along because our culture tells us that net worth = human worth = intelligence = trustworthiness.

There's no continuing the thought, like if the money won't help struggling teachers then why is it so important that it stay with the person who already has ten thousand times the amount of money that would make a teacher rich and set for life?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Have you heard the song 'If I were a rich man' from Fiddler on the roof? One of the lyrics was that if he was a rich man people would flock to him ask him questions that 'would cross a Rabbi's eyes' meaning they would be complicated. And he says that it would not matter if he was wrong or right since being rich alone is what gives you credibility.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Yeah, Bezos pays almost nothing in income tax compared to his wealth.

Double of almost nothing is still almost nothing. So I guess he's technically right, which is usually the best type of right...but.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Said without irony as he sits in front of his personal vanity rocket. How many teachers could we pay a decent wage with that thing Jeff? What would we lose? Sending Katy Perry and her flower to space?

[–] gumball4933@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Bezos is right. 2 x 0 = 0

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

I mean he is probably technically correct. But let's tax them a lot not double of the pittance they pay.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I promise you that when we eat him Bezos will be delicious.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago

I'd be open to try it though, for science..

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

You could kill Epstein and it's not gonna make a difference I promise

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

"I promise you, it wouldn't work. Actually, it'd make everything worse. So just trust me and don't try it. It's for your own good. I know what I'm talking about. You know I'd never lie, right? So no matter what happens, don't try it. Okay?"

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well he's right. 0 x2 = 0 ...

Seems i was very late to joke. I'll see myself out.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Why dont we just take it all then it'll get put to use

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Education is paid for by property taxes. So increasing income tax revenue will not help teacher salaries unless the funding mechanism is changed.

Specifically, new taxes on businesses and billionaires need to be specifically earmarked for education, otherwise that money just goes to the pentagons bloated budget. Basically from one pocket to the other. Billionaires don’t want to pay for massive wars, they want to profit from arms sales and the military industrial complex.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I have a great idea, we'll take all his billions, and set them on fire. No tax! And all of a sudden, inflation goes the other way for a day

Edit: spelling

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 4 months ago

this is one of my things. you get these arguments about how well the government may spend the money but even if great wealth was taxed and burnt like you say it would have massive good effects on the economy. Its wealth disparity that is the problem.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

No one's talking about just double. Orders of magnitude.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Your promises ain't worth shit.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

Mayor of my heart

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

"Trust me, bro."

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Let's try it and see, you may have conflicting goals

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

He can promise that it won't help because the people he's paid to put in power will refuse to act on it.

Shit, we could make life better for a lot of people if we just distributed the federal revenue we have now differently, but that requires not bowing down to the agendas of billionaire donors.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Interesting stratagy of trying to get lower taxes for the angry little people to distract from you own under contributions bazos. I don't think it's worked but it was worth a shot I guess.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

So then he apparently doesn't even know what taxes even are, or why they're collected.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

He's saying that because he understands the government is corrupt and those tax dollars would end up in the pockets of Trump and his sycophants, and funneled into the military-industrial complex in support of this months' endless war du joure, right? Right?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago (6 children)

taxes for lower salary workers is to high becuase we do not collect enough on wealth. At this point to much wealth does not come from work but if we taxed all income regardless of source then it should be 0% until about 100k and then 5% until 200k and 10% until 400k and 15% until 700k and 20% until 1 mil and 25% until 2mil and 30% until 10mil and 35% until 20mil and 40% until 40 mil and 45% until 100mil and 50% for everything over that. Its so rediculous what we don't tax at all and when we do tax the highest has been hovering around 30% since we started having growing debt again. Then to boot the highest rate stars in the very lowest end of the six figures and never goes up more. its crazy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Hmmm.. ok, but what if we kill you and give that teacher in Queens 5 million of your dollars?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

That's because you're paying way less than half of what you should. Shall we start with 10% of everything over a billion of your net worth per year?

load more comments
view more: next ›