this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
408 points (99.5% liked)

politics

29839 readers
2150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New electoral maps are erasing Black representations. The effort takes its cues from American history

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago

Americans are trapped in a pincer movement being executed by the wealthy aristocracy that controls both political parties

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I have a feeling that it will be 2040, Republicans are the only legal party and there will be illegal underground news articles that are still titled "Republicans are trying to end America's democracy."

At what point are any of the people writing these articles going to acknowledge that they've already done it and that only way to reverse it is through law breaking?

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Americans have so thoroughly been taught to follow the law and be polite since they began school that there is no snapping them out of it. They will let the fascist take their freedoms, taxes, health, sanity and more. Everyone of them will keep trying to vote harder.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

November mattered? Since when?

Sure, they add up ballots, why not? It's our tradition.

Whoever spends the most wins over 90% of the time.

Regardless, Amazon will "donate" to BoTh PaRtIeS beforehand, of course! If one party wins, they'll have an easier time of it to open that new distribution center.

If the other party wins, Amazon will be like "darn it!", and it will cost them more money, but they will still get that new distribution center.

You can be sure that whomever wins, the poor humps working at that new distribution center will lose.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

To use the colorful patois of Anaheim, California, where I grew up: "NO DOY!"

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It’s happening and Americans are either complicit or powerless to do anything about it.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They had a chance in November 2024. They wasted it.

America is complicit.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

A chance for what exactly?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

powerless to do anything about it.

They''re not powerless. They could've had more than 3 protests in the past 16 months before giving up.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

They weren't protests- they were parades. They had fucking live music and barbecue grills. Social media posts talking about how much "fun" they had protesting.

An absolute joke.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Every time I hear someone suggest protesting I have to assume they're a liberal. Which means they oppose leftists at every opportunity, oppose any acts of violence like the killing of Brian Thompson, explain the pragmatism of blocking the rail strike in 2022 and defend Biden for going around congress twice to ship weapons to Israel and preventing a legitimate primary from being run in 2024.

The short of it being, liberals oppose any kind of disruption so what exactly do they believe protests are supposed to accomplish?

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That's the thing- they don't.

For American liberals, protesting isn't the means, it's the end.

It's their opportunity to telegraph to everyone that they're "on the right side." Accomplishing that and easing their guilt for doing fuck-all are the only outcomes they give a shit about.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

, liars, thieves, and cheats.

Can’t win any other way.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 91 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I swear if I read one more headline of an article attempting to tell me something I’ve been desperately trying to convince people of for a decade I’m gonna need to start drinking before noon

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 9 hours ago

If you were saying it for the decade then you were taking about different thing and missing that they literally want to finish US democracy on its 250 anniversary.

There was work to gradually undermine elections, but right now they are going all in. It is very different to the past.

https://youtu.be/XaqKHHbSOEc

trump is obsessed about his ballroom and how it will provide security for him, taking about snipers on the roof, paying $1M to people who wanted to overthrow government for him.

It's clear that his plan is to stay in power and prepare when people will go after him.

[–] NoosFraba@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago

Welcome to the club

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

I hope this backfires spectacularly and all the left of center voters turn out in record numbers to flip all these new diluted districts

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Worth the read.

It's disturbing how blatant it is, and the through line from the American Civil War and the failure of Reconstruction to deal with the lingering Confederate elements appropriately.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I can remember so many conversations where someone was just so deeply clueless about how many Americans, mostly living in the South, are still so very deeply resentful of losing that war.

One conversation was in the 90s and I was talking to an H1-B who had just come from Texas, and we were working in the NE. I asked how it was living and working in Texas and he just seemed to brush all that off as something "from the past".

If only.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's so surprising, I am shocked. I wonder if anyone could've predicted this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Definitely not. No one ever said that there would be dire consequences to electing racist psychopaths.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Water is wet
Sky is blue
I don’t get a vote
Neither do you.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

That should be pretty easy for them to achieve, seeing as how this administration can turn the country on its' head twice a week and no one, seemingly, bats an eye.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Republican project isn’t to win in November. It’s to make November cease to matter

Brave words from The Guardian. They need to be heard.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you just quote the title of the article, which is also the title of the post?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When the Dems take back the power, they will have to act decisively to declare MAGA a National Security Threat, and purge it from our government and our society. Further, their followers can never hold office under the 14th Amendment, Section 3.

A new conservative party will have to be built from the ground up, without MAGA representation, with a rededication to their traditional core values of smaller government, lower taxes, fiscal responsibility. There needs to be government regulation guiding them, and the moment they try to get racial, or religious, they are disbanded again, and they can start over.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

...why the fuck do we NEED a conservative party?

What do they stand for that needs to be represented? Religious intolerance? Trillion dollar military? Open corruption?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

Count on the democrats to do absolutely nothing of the kind

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, that was my response as well. We had a literal violent coup and their decisive action was just stuck their thumbs up their ass.