this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
663 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

31416 readers
1275 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, this is official documentation from the MS Learn course for the Agentic AI Solution Architect certificate

Microslop SharePhont™

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

I'm starting to think they aren't concerned about making their slides even remotely veritable. This one's barely even combigent!

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 points 3 minutes ago

I started using linkwarden to archive their documentation for various things just so I know I'm not crazy when it changes.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 53 minutes ago

Those are perfectly cromulent words.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 21 minutes ago

I thought it wasn't in English at first.

[–] J92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

It's Microslop. The people who had any resemblance of work ethics left a long time ago. No one still working there gives any shits about QA - especially not the management.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is not AI, AI would have made it much better. I mean, the only thing LLMs are quite good at is writing words, it is uncommon they misspell a word.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 hours ago

LLMs misspell words in generated images. Modern models aren’t as bad as they were a year or two ago, but we don’t know what model was used here.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 20 points 8 hours ago

Due to the negative press combigent

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 18 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Veritable answer? Indubitably!

[–] CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Saw this article from Microslop the other day about their MDASH copilot model competing with Mythos for bug finding/fixing.

Microsoft security blog

And here's the image they went with for the flowchart of what the AI does... Complete with overlapping text and the worst layout I've ever seen.

Zero humans proofed this.

Microsoft AI slop flowchart

[–] death_to_carrots@feddit.org 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I know this! This is a slide deck which only makes sense in an interactive way, where the steps are revealed after one another. Probably straight from a presentation.

Don't attribute bad work to AI which can be done in the same way by an incompetent human.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

As someone who's career depended on presentations for a while:

Never build animations in-slide (unless they are purely aesthetic).

Instead:

Build multiple slides which duplicate the previous and add new boxes with transitions on the slides. Bonus: change the title on each build to cover the key point.

Sure, they take longer to edit. But that leave-behind export to PDF always works.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 53 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Data Flow

Data Flow


Data Flow

The Data must Flow

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz -5 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

AI doesn't misspell words. It's more like hypercorrect which reveals it.

Unless MS uses some very outdated models of course.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 20 minutes ago

You forgot the /s

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Unless the whole thing is a generated image, then it can certainly misspell words.

[–] TRock@feddit.dk 1 points 2 hours ago

Claude is quite often making spelling mistakes

[–] Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

You missed "Microsoft 36S" and "Intemal Docs"

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah those are very weird errors. Not like AI hallucinations. But more like OCR errors.

I wonder if they imported another PowerPoint and then the AI made images out of it to process it. That would be a very inefficient way to do it.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

Maybe the AI has had an OCR pass grafted onto its output processing to make it seem more capable of producing text. AI image generation usually makes weird alien looking text, I could imagine someone deciding to add on an automatic cleanup step to try to make it less obviously AI.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 106 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Anyone remember how much nicer the world felt before we all realized nobody in charge of anything with any real power has any idea what the fuck they're doing?

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Well back then we thought everyone in charge was evil. Back then we had Krutschev, Nixon etc. Always nuclear war looming. And Reagan with this trickle downs, the Bush wars over made-up WMDs etc.

I don't think there was ever really a positive period. Maybe the 90s which was kinda the high point. Economics were good, America and NATO was the undisputed world power, nobody took global warming seriously yet and the internet was promising a great future.

Then after 2000 we had the dot com crash, 9/11, the resulting wars, Russia becoming an enemy again, the financial world crisis, the rise of the internet as a surveillance tool, global warming, the pandemic, exploding house prices everywhere.

Really pretty much exactly after the change of the century everything turned to shit.

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Economics were good if you lived in a western country. Former Soviet Block, Yugoslavia, and global South countries were having a rough go of thing in the 90s

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 13 minutes ago

They're still having a rough go of things, and they were having a rough go of things before that as well, so that's not really a valid counterpoint.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah but the future was bright back then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 39 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Combigent is too nice a sounding word to lack any real meaning it needs one.

[–] notso@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Combigent [kəmˈbʌɪdʒ(ə)nt] {adj} A portmanteau of combine and emergent, describing sth. derived from combination, the ability to combine newly discovered facts or bullshit hallucinated by AI. Examples: The LLM gave a combigent response. The manager's presentation was quite combigent.

[–] bright@piefed.social 10 points 12 hours ago

Combigent (adj.)

Definition: A word that seems like a real word but actually isn't

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nocteb@feddit.org 128 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

who morged that? Why does that happen continvously?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 34 points 14 hours ago

What a combigent, inbiltum response!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 34 points 13 hours ago

Seems perfectly cromulent to me

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 68 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 130 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 58 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] faebudo@infosec.pub 60 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

It would be really funny if it wasn't so sad.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›