this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
446 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

21196 readers
1453 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45445434

Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

When I was born, the human population was around half of what it is now. If there ever was a time to organically decrease our population size, imo, it would be now.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I mean, they're right.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

Brace yourselves for the pedophile parasite class campaign to justify their crimes

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Aren't these the people who freaked out about teenage pregnancies?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They're Republicans. Of course they are concerned about teen pregnancies.

Who do you think is making them pragernet?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

They were angry about “single mothers” for decades, but that was a racist dog whistle.

If you’re all white, it’s all right.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Abstinence education is working! How are they not happy at their success?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a normal country, a doctor endorsing teen pregnancy would get their licence suspended.

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

This just reminds me of a US coworker of mine who just became a great grandmother. It's teen pregrancies all the way down. Mother at 16, grandmother in her 30s, great grandmother at 50.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

She’s either super cool or super annoying. Former teen moms don’t really have an in-between. since she's in tech i'm assuming super cool.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many times do conservatives have to prove that they're all pedophiles before the rest of us will learn?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

not a matter of "learning", it's a matter of "caring"

everyone knows by now this regime is full of pedophiles… but nobody gives enough of a fuck to do anything about it

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm not talking about the regime. I mean every last one of them.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

15-19 yr olds aren’t supposed to be having kids.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hell some of them ARE kids

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

From my perspective, everyone under about 24 is still a kid.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

In a regular society? Yes. But this is America we're talking about.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fucking lemongrab grade screeching of purity and abstinence for decades and then suddenly this

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Now, now, let's not pretend these people are encouraging sex, those young whores are still to be shamed.

They're just supposed to have kids and be loyal to husbando. No pleasure involved.

(Also, they always supported teen pregnancy because they have always been anti-sex education and anti-contraceptive which allows the process of teenage parents to happen without them having to condone it).

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 17 hours ago

Every accusation a confession.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

just what the world needs, more americans

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I remember when teen pregnancy was considered bad and a sign of a decaying morality across the country. Now the same right wing moralizers are saying they need those teen moms again. But this time it's about money so they are noticeably quiet about morality.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They're saying the quiet part out loud and why they're anti-abortion. The younger the better for a quick turnaround:

They need the poors to fight their wars and work on their factory floors.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I frequently just stand outside and look at the sky and think, yep, we weren't meant to work all day. We were meant to pick berries and mushrooms and take naps. I feel better about my station in life, knowing those oligarchs can never be satisfied, and all I have to do to feel right is take a walk outside.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I distinctly remember a time when boomers and talking heads would automatically respond to concerns about issues with the cost of having kids with:

"Don't have kids if you can't afford them."

"If you couldn't afford kids then you should've kept your legs closed."

"Don't expect a handout, nobody forced you to have kids."

"Healthcare and child care are too expensive? Tough shit snowflake, that's the free market! Work harder!"

"Why are my taxes paying for a public school when I don't even have any kids that go there?"

So nope, no sympathies. And no, you can't have your child sex brides, either.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

They are still saying this when it's convenient for them. The only consistent thing for such people is their cowardice in the face of responsibility.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe if you just imprison fertile women and give them to rich couples to fuck and impregnate, that will solve the problem? You could call them handmaid's to distract from what they really are!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LilRed@lemmy.org 65 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Who the fuck wants to be having kids in this day and age anyway. Also why is it up to the underage teens to push out babies to keep the population up. Yeah let's put pressure on them to ruin their entire lives before they even get to live it. Love the American standards.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

And guess who the fathers to those teen pregnancies are? It’s men over 20. Adding a layer of ick to what he’s lamenting.

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fertility rates are an issue for capitalism not humanity

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Logistics at a certain point does not care what economic model you follow. Someone has to plant the crops and do all the other work that leads to people being fed, clothed, and housed under any system.

If your demographics are such that there are not enough people of working age to take care of those too old to work, you're going to have the kind of problems that led other human societies to kill their elders.

It'd be great if we could automate our way out of this, but I don't see that happening soon enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›