446
Fox News doc says not enough ’15 to 19′ year-olds are having kids: ‘The fertility is down’
(www.mediaite.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
446 points (98.5% liked)
Not The Onion
21196 readers
1453 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're saying the quiet part out loud and why they're anti-abortion. The younger the better for a quick turnaround:
They need the poors to fight their wars and work on their factory floors.
I frequently just stand outside and look at the sky and think, yep, we weren't meant to work all day. We were meant to pick berries and mushrooms and take naps. I feel better about my station in life, knowing those oligarchs can never be satisfied, and all I have to do to feel right is take a walk outside.
Didn't we always hunt?
Yeah, that's why we can run
Edit: Distance running that is. Humans have better endurance than almost any land animal, so we can chase prey to exhaustion. It helps that we're crafty enough to carry water and snacks with us
Not an expert, but that would depend on the location, probably. Smaller game, certainly, but not everyone had large animals roaming around. Likewise, there were probably people who hunted and didn't gather that much because there simply wasn't that type of plant around.
But the point made still stands: modern life is not something natural to our evolution.
Peoples would migrate across continents to follow the populations of animals if there were no large animals presently roaming around.
Given that, I think it's safe to guess most early humans were more than willing to put in a little more effort to hunt over gather regardless of location.
Yeah, Ill sit in a deer stand all afternoon, or pick blueberries. Both are better than email.
No, they want robots to work in the factories, because they don't complain and don't unionize, and don't take time off, and work for electrons.
Yeah, but the good news is they are going to keep us desperate and dependent until that can be attained with certainty just in case that plan doesn't work out for them and they're stuck with us.
They want to not have to pay the people who will be buying the things produced in the factories.
The logical problem with that is too many steps ahead for them to see.