this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
284 points (96.4% liked)

politics

29328 readers
2264 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 132 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Here's the important number:

Just 5% said they regret their vote and would vote differently if they could.

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 42 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

That's the important part. Only 5% regret their vote. Most people in this thread who are celebrating and laughing, only read the headline.

This kind of "told you so!" stuff and thinking they were untouchable is what led to the Democrats loss. And will again if people aren't careful. People need to stop thinking "Not Trump!", because that doesn't win elections. Dems need to come up with some good candidates who are more than just "not Trump."

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The party is losing support poll after poll after poll, and they think attacking leftists is going to help. The polls are screaming that they are going in the wrong direction, and they are completely obsessed with Hasan Piker right now. There is a coordinated effort going on across social media that is so sad and obvious. They are flailing and crashing out and it’s pathetic. I’ve never seen a party more outwardly hostile to its own voters than the mother fucking Democratic party. The Republicans at least feign like they care about their voter’s desires (mostly because they just tell their voters what they want).

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

The Democratic party isn't there to represent left-wing voters. They're there to make sure that left-wing voters don't get represented by any party

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The party is losing support poll after poll after poll, and they think attacking leftists is going to help.

Yep, just now, in another thread I was accused of being being propaganda. LMAO All because I said that back in 2024, Lemmy was even more hostile to people who criticized the Dem party than they are now. It was wrong to do then, and wrong to do now lol

Democrats just can not accept responsibility for what happened for some reason. It's always a blame game.

They need better candidates or shit's gonna get even worse. How hard is it to find someone under the age of 60, and who has independent forward-thinking ideas and cares about the public?! WTF?! I like AOC, but I am not hearing any talk of them putting her in the running, so no clue what they are gonna do. But election is only 2 years away. They need to start doing something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

These are articles are for leopardsatemyface crowd. It's simply about smug hur during. Nothing of value will be accomplished. Probably gonna get worse.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

5% regret their vote

Read that, then look at how small election splits are. This is a good thing.

Do we get frustrated and angry as we wish everyone who defaulted to voting right because their parents did and they don't know better and can't be bothered to read real news? Yes.

Should we be happy when enough people show change to be visible on the horizon? Also yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Before any Centrist disagree, ask yourself who's currently the president and why. Ask yourself if centrism is a viable strategy for stopping Trump and candidates like Trump based on the evidence, not the common knowledge that's been disproven

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes but it's actually 16% that would vote differently. These people are just incapable of admitting having done the wrong thing and admitting regret.

When given a chance to recast their 2024 votes, in fact, just 84% of Trump voters said they would vote for him again — compared to 91% for Harris voters.

So while some might prefer to not call it “regret,” 16% would apparently do things differently with hindsight.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago

Dishonesty cuts both ways. Trump has consistently performed better than his polling shows, because an awful lot of people wouldn't admit that they voted for him. Just because these people say they regret their vote doesn't mean they actually do.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

That's a pretty weak headline tho. \s

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's possible that some of them don't want to admit to a stranger that they'd change their vote.

But, most of it is probably choice-supportive bias or post-purchase rationalization. They believe they're smart, right-thinking people and that they couldn't have made a horrible mistake, so they look for reasons to feel like they made the right choice, despite all the evidence against it. They're supported by a whole group of propaganda networks that explain away every bad thing that Trump does and shift the blame to democrats, liberals, trans people, immigrants, non-whites, women, etc.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's possible that some of them don't want to admit to a stranger that they'd change their vote.

Surely it's more likely that Trump voters who have changed their minds don't want to admit that they were previously Trump voters?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 56 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Another hopeful sounding headline telling us all what we want to hear.

Meanwhile in the text of the article:

When given a chance to recast their 2024 votes, in fact, just 84% of Trump voters said they would vote for him again

Just 84%?!

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

That's still a massive loss of support. In a free election, that would mean one of the worst election losses in history.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 10 points 6 days ago

I see your point but I guess part of me really wants to see evidence that more of the maga cult has come to their senses. 84% still being willing to vote for him again damages my view of my fellow americans even more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What a sad bunch of simple minded morons

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

I bet it's even higher than that in actuality. There are people who know they should be embarrassed by it, but still support him anyway.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

This is so sad, that he is a rapist, and ruin the economy, takes healthcare away from people, illegally arrest immigrants, while having his Gestapo forces shoot people in the face, destroys US democracy and fail to help old allies in Ukraine didn't do it.
Even entering an illegal war and committing war crimes didn't do it.
But the gas increasing 1 dollar, that's the straw that breaks the camels back!! Except it didn't totally.

Paraphrasing:

Today 62% said they were “very confident” in their vote.
Another 21% of Trump voters said they were still “confident” in their votes but had “some concerns.”

That's a whopping 83% of Trump voters who are still OK with their vote and how things are going!!

[–] BoosBeau@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Nothing is actually real until it adversely affects them.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's cult, and Trump knew what he was doing. He said he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose any support. Now he literally admit to and rape kids and they still blindly follow him. Hell they probably offer up their own children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

YTs in the imperial core are not even close to being rational actors. They've lived their whole lives inside the bubble.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

They control the release of these polling numbers. They control information. Anything you are hearing from a "source" is curated.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Will they learn from it?

No. The non-voters still haven't.

But you see, when JD Vance takes over it'll be all kinds of different and the Republicans will finally fix everything the Deep State Democrat Trump broke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 46 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Here are the percentages of 2024 Trump voters who disapproved of him in each of these areas:

  • Gas prices: 45%

Does that mean that the majority of Trump voters approve of Trump's gas prices? A nation of masochists, apparently.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

High gas prices are a pittance if we can bring Jesus back! (I wish this were a joke).

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If he can turn water into wine, then by god we can waterboard that Palestinian until he turns it into ethanol for our cars.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

There was an article a few weeks ago where folks were interviewed at a gas station in Pennsylvania. Two of the Trump voters who was fine with the higher prices said it was an acceptable price to pay to keep the nation safe. They really thought Iran was going to attack the US, possibly with nukes.

I have no hope of changing the minds who fervently believe in that crap

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They really thought Iran was going to attack the US, possibly with nukes.

Ofc this disinformation is central to the hegemonic narrative and widely disseminated by NPR, NYTimes, etc. Not to mention the overtly fascist media.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Some of his supporters will accept anything with a smile as long as it's their side doing it. Some are so drowned in right wing media bullshit that they might as well be living in a parallel universe. And some will just be so averse to criticizing Trump (particularly in a poll which is likely to have political remifications) that they'll defend or ignore almost anything bad, even if they do hate it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Imperial media obscures the connection. I heard NPR talking about higher gas prices with ZERO mention of trump/iran. And, if they do mention it, they usually blame Iran at least implicitly but often explicitly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every asshole I know that voted for the pedo-in-chief will need to put in a lot of work to make amends.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Most of the ones I know are unapologetic about their support for him, when asked. They're definitely less vocal than when he started off his 2nd term, though.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Because a large % of them are incapable of admitting they were that wrong about something so consequential. Many of them will continue supporting him to preserve their ego, even as their own family members stop speaking to them.

Ask me how I know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

Pfft yeah right. Child rape didn't do it and nothing else will either.

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They’ll vote again for him and his ilk. Being unhappy doesn’t make you admit you’re wrong. Also, the weight of gas prices doesn’t compare to the pleasure of inflicting cruelty on the non-white “others”…

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They’ll vote again for him and his ilk.

Ofc there's no other option. They're all of his ilk.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Now already? /s Better late than never, hope they manage to turn the tide for them selves. Trust and respect from the rest of the world will take deccades (if ever) but they will never ever regain the position they once had.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

if november elections happen (big if), he's gonna rig them big time. We all know that.

Because, otherwise, if he wins again, and does it fairly, the US deserve to become a big north korea.

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Not that I put anything past this administration, but in order for him to “win again” we would need to rewrite the constitution as the 22nd amendment specifically bans more than two terms of a presidency. I’m not saying he won’t try because they are indeed deplorable monsters.

[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They’re referring to midterm elections which are happening this year

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago

They will never vote for anyone who doesn't have an 'R' next to their name on the ballot. That should say it all...

[–] null@lemmy.org 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't believe it for a second. Any real-life person I know who supported Trump is still fully bought in. Don't confuse fewer flags and hats as less support, it just means people are poorer now than they were before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"Oh wait,I didn't think he'd hurt me! He was only supposed to hurt the people I hate."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›