Comic Strips

Game design is better today than it's ever been. For most of us I think it's just nostalgia for our childhoods and for living in simpler times that makes us think otherwise.

I mean have you ever gone back and played a classic game that you didn't grow up with? It's rough. I've plumbed the depths of the NES virtual console and found that all the best games just happen to be the ones I've already played. That's probably not a coincidence.

Even when the game is genuinely great, there's still a mountain of bullshit and bad game design to get through, which is just unnecessary today.

With that said, everyone in this comment section needs to check out UFO 50. It's a collection of 50 "retro" games by a group of indie games designers, and it's absolutely brilliant.

It's a loving recreation of playing games how they used to be played, except it's cleverly laced with subtle, modern design features that make the retro goodness so much better. It's like combing through old ROMs trying to find a diamond in the rough, except there's more diamond than rough.

Speaking of Easter eggs, UFO 50 also has a hidden meta-narrative buried deep in the collection, detailing the dark history of the fictional company that made them.

Developers didn't really know what would work and what wouldn't, so they fucked around until they found something. No endless clones of the same idea. Extremely weird gameplay, often utter bullshit, sometimes a gem. It was great.

I miss that games were completely finished and polished, put on a disk, and never touched again.

Look, I have been replaying Prince of Persia Sands of Time these last few days and it's just fucking incredible how streamlined it is.

the pause menu is just resume/options/quit? no inventory management, skill tree, quest tracker, or other bullshit? Remember this is the IP that spawned Assassin's Creed

also.. it still looks great, with relatively detailed interiors and architecture, great animations and soundtrack, characters quipping about and it all manages to run on 256Mb of ram??

Oh man, @Beep@lemmus.org is gonna be so pissed you kept Field Explores' name in the comic.

Except there WAS online play. Since like the 90s. RTS games especially had online tournaments. Also, LAN parties used to be epic.

Games DID receive updates when needed. Internet speeds were slow, so it was expected that when you bought a game you got the game after installation, and not a day one patch that barely fixes anything.

As for the other kinds of updates; games got expansion packs. As the name would suggest, they expanded the game. Sometimes quite drastically.

Saves still corrupt to this day in brand new AAA releases.

The thing about updates is that they weren't needed that much. Games didn't release half broken at 3FPS because "we'll just fix it later, maybe"

Eh. As someone who plays MANY games, I can't say that I agree with the notion of old games being inherently better. The interface, bugginess, or lack of QOL often hamstrings the experience.

IMO, it would be best if old games are remade. Arcanum is a pain in the rear, because the text and images can be small on my monitor, plus crashing if I click too quickly. Technical issues are my #1 killer of games, because it takes the wind out of my sails if I try to get into something.

How in the fuck has no one yet said:

No Microtransactions.

No Gacha Games (literally 50% of current year gaming).

No Games As A Subscription Service.

No Games With Perpetual DLC (that are each as expensive as other entire games).

Gog tries to give you as much of this as possible

Older games were a lot simpler too. No loot boxes, multiple forms of currency - some of which could only be bought with real money, invasive DRM, season passes, content pulled back by selling it to you as DLC, extremely long game times artificially extended by things like mapping gimmicks, giant and almost barren worlds, unoptomized graphics requiring top of the line graphics cards that would still turn your room to a furnace, and massive amounts of bugs and glitches that may or may not be patched out at a later time.

No updates or mtx is a big upside tbh

whoopse I tripped and dropped my https://finji.itch.io/tunic link

the same developers as A Night in the Woods you say?

No updates, that's actually a plus in my mind these days, considering how many games they've taken down. You can't take a disk from someone's game collection, but you can certainly remove it when it's been purchased digitally.

Everything that is now a DLC or microtransaction was instead some cool secret you could find or unlock, the games were smaller but that discovery meant they FELT so much bigger.

It's interesting how games from the 80s and 90s, in general, required less time to complete than the crop that came with the PS2 era. DVDs allowed for much, much longer games, sometimes to a fault, other times the extra time to complete was in the form of challenges or unlockable characters.

Let's not forget that half of the replayability of NES/SNES/PSX era titles came from "my entire collection is 25 games"

Ahhhh the little sleeves in the crystal cases that you would read excitedly on the way home.

no updates How many old games actually made it to the store still needing updates? I have heard of at least one, maybe two, games which had real game-breaking bugs and could have used an update to fix them.

If you really like the nostalgia of old instruction booklets, or buying a game outside your spoken language, try Tunic. Fantastic game

No bullshit. You gamed, you died, you tried again.

Sensible soccer is better than any modern football game. Fight me!