this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
802 points (99.0% liked)

memes

20113 readers
2077 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 154 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don’t think he’ he’d be a good Gandalf anyways

nothing against him, but what we got was perfect. 

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 79 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's hard for me to imagine anyone else in any of the roles. They are all such perfect fits.

[–] flatplutosociety@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Gollum should've been played by Nicolas Cage. With no VFX or makeup.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also Willem Dafoe with a bald cap could pull it off.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I'm something of a hoarder myself ... but only for this precious ring!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (14 children)

That reminds me of how Will Smith turned down Neo in The Matrix because he thought Wild Wild West was the safer bet.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 week ago

He would have been an awful Neo. Bullet dodged for everyone.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, the only good decision he's made lately was to not appear in the Independence Day sequel.

i'm gonna be honest looking at will smith's career the good decisions were ones other people made

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] flatplutosociety@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He would've been awful. Connery was good at playing smarmy dickheads, but he was kind of ass any time he wasn't playing a smarmy dickhead.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is why his performance in The Rock is pitch perfect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (5 children)

To be fair to Connery, Zardoz was right after 007. He was type casted and nobody would hire him. He had to do something different to get new work. Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie... If you get past the weird and laughable aesthetic choices, the plot is a decent sci fi plot.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And then Highlander, so it was no wonder he was a bit wary when it came to LOTR.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My shubmarine doeshn’t react well to bulletsh, Ryan.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You've really gotta admire his outright contempt at the thought of even attempting a Russian accent in that movie.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

His character is actually Lithuanian, so he shouldn't have a Russian accent. Not that Scottish is accurate...

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

It was a thriller movie in the 90s for American audiences.

Whether he had contempt or not the accents did not matter. Just needed something to indicate "not American"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Some things in here don’t react well to bullets”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

But Highlander was awesome.

It won the Academy Award for best movie ever made.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

Also, Zardoz is where he came up with the policy of not acting in movies that he doesn't "get".

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zardoz is legit a good movie

I assumed it was going to be, but when I watched I found it aggressively terrible.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But, did you watch it a second time? Honestly it's awful the first watch because you can't get past the aesthetic of it. When I watched it again I realized the movie itself is pretty good. It's practically the definition of a good bad movie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Zardoz is legit a good movie

Well, ok. But we are comparing it with the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

(But then, committing to a trilogy probably has a huge opportunity cost.)

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bear in mind that very few people thought a film adaptation of LOTR was actually going to be any good. It seems obvious now, but it was not seen a really viable project with how trilogies were made at the time (with many years between them) the amount of budget needed, and the effects challenges. The guys who made the movies deserve a lot of credit for doing something so well that it looks obvious when they are done, but little thinks like how to do the hobbits were seen as effects challenges with no real solution that wouldn't look stupid or be insanely expensive.

Connery would have been the biggest name in the film and getting attached to something that wound up looking like shit or making him look stupid would have been a bigger problem for him than anyone. Again, its obvious that they turned out great, but look at what Peter Jackson made before this and its not really as obvious a choice as one would think now (although I am personally a fan of his early work, I get why people might not be and why people maybe wouldn't hand him the biggest film franchise in history).

And just for a fun tidbit, at the time that Connery bailed on the offer the film was being produced by Weinstein, so I get maybe not wanting to work with that dirtbag. They almost lost Liv Tyler for the same reason and reportedly did lose them Ashley Judd and Mia Sorvino, who flat out refused to be attached to anything involving him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I heard this story, not sure if it's true, but I choose to believe it and will not hear any corrections; apparently, he was approached about Gandalf, but he turned it down because he didn't really understand it. Then he was approached about Dumbledore, but turned it down because he didn't really understand it. After seeing how those two franchises turned out, he said, "screw it, I'm taking the next role that I don’t get." That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

Which is a shame really because I remember it being... Kinda good? Clearly not a work of great art, but fun action silliness. Admittedly I watched it as a kid and never again so who knows really.

Didn’t hate it? It was a fun action film. Sometimes people take things too seriously.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd also argue that however the movie did after the fact, turning down roles you don't understand is probably the smarter option. Maybe those other movies would have also flopped if they had Connery in those roles.

Like I can't picture him doing a good Gandalf. It wouldn't be Gandalf, it would be Sean Connery in a wizard outfit. I can't think of any roles where Connery played someone who wasn't Sean Connery. He brought a lot of charisma to his roles but not a ton of range.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus can you actually imagine if LOTR had Sean Connery instead of Ian McKellen? Hideous prospect. No shade to Connery, he's played some of my favourite characters over the years, but christ that would have been a terrible mistake.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Idk he could land "Run, you foolsh!" pretty well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

There was a population boost in the town they filmed Zardoz in due to all of the drug-induced revelry that was going on during the making of that movie.

There is a good chance that town is populated with tens if not scores of Sean Connery's illegitimate grandchildren now.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago

“And sho do all who live to shee shuch timesh. But that ish not for them to deshide. All we have to deshide ish what to do with the time that ish give to ush.”

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, maybe the bottom picture made perfect sense to Sean?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, it's called "I was young and broke, and needed the money".

Although, I really do recommend watching Zardoz at least once. It's a trip.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

I've enjoyed a great deal of movies with Connery as the lead. I think he made the right choice not being Gandalf.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zardoz was awesome though. It actually had an interesting world and compelling sci fi ideas. And one of the greatest reveals in cinema! You know why call him "Zardoz", right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] totesmygoat@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm sure his time on league of extraordinary gentlemen made him never want to do anything even near that kind of movie ever again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The gun is good!

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even selective people make bad selections now and then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

The name is Grey. Gandalf the Grey.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cocaine was cheap and plentiful in the 70s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Connery even made a Michael Bay movie watchable.

There's not many actors that can say that.

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mandatory "you shall not paasshh"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›