I would love to put all the blame on the police... but the frand jury refused to indite? Who the hell were those people? What is wrong with them. Ignore the judges "instructions". Vote to indite. These things won't stop until you stand up for what is right.
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
322 points (99.7% liked)
News
35451 readers
2598 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Shitty local police again.
Police officer follows child home, escalates situation, family asks police to leave, they instead forcibly enter the home and shoot the child.
Cops gonna cops
It's going to get worse until Congress, legislatures, and courts impose penalties on the police departments instead of the tax payers.
Not just the cop that fucked up, but the entire department. They either knew damn well that they had a dangerous asshat in their ranks and refused to get rid of him before something like this happened, or they're dangerous asshats themselves. The only fix is to make them highly motivated to police themselves.
My suggestion (though I'm open to any idea that works) is fines/penalties/settlements for shit like this comes out of their retirement funds. And not just the police union's pension fund, but private IRAs as well. Put it all on the table. Don't leave any loop holes for them to skirt around taking responsibility for making sure every officer is qualified to do the job and not be a menace to society.
Another tact is to insure the police. There was an NPR journal on that a long time ago and it worked wonders where a police department was basically the gang that couldn't shoot straight, running up all kinds of crazy legal fees for the city. Insurance compliance drove 100% of the needed departmental changes in a way that kept behavior, budget, and the city council in check. In exchange, the insurance policy was there for any mishaps or gross mistakes that would require a payout of any kind.
Foisting change politically by top-down policy was woefully ineffective in comparison. While this doesn't fix the underlying problems with qualified immunity and how the cops can still fuck up anyone's day on a whim, this does help.
My suggestion (though I’m open to any idea that works) is fines/penalties/settlements for shit like this comes out of their retirement funds.
My favorite reform approach is for law enforcement officers being required to carry professional insurance. Police are often referring to themselves as professionals. Let them carry insurance like doctors do for malpractice or professional engineers do.
To ease the transition, I propose that the department cover the base insurance premiums for each officer. If an officer has a judgment against them that raises their insurance premiums, the officer is now responsible for paying for the overage out of their own pocket. If the officer continues to exhibit behavior that results in judgments against them, their premiums will continue to rise eventually to the point where the bad officer cannot afford the overage premiums and will then have to stop working as police because they are not carrying the required insurance. So bad officers will self select out.
There's also another angle where the base premiums will likely be calculated based upon the entire department. If there is a badly behaved officer, this will raise the base rate of all officers too, so the department has a financial incentive to get rid of bad officers because they are too expensive.
As long as that last paragraph is true, I could support this. There has to be enough motivation for them to get rid of bad cops before they become a problem, not after.
Edit; But I also imagine that the insurance companies themselves would be pretty focused on making sure each cop was attending good training on how to be effective instead of what they're currently getting which seems to be, "Everyone wants to kill you! Kill them first!"
So, yeah, this could work.
There has to be enough motivation for them to get rid of bad cops before they become a problem, not after.
I'm understand where you're going with this statement in spirit, but not in execution. An officer is only a problem after they have done harm to the public for which they serve. How then could a department get rid of a bad officer before this bad behavior presents itself?
How then could a department get rid of a bad officer before this bad behavior presents itself?
The public only becomes aware of the bad behavior when it goes too far and, for example, a cop unnecessarily kills somebody.
But that doesn't just happen out of the blue. That cop's coworkers and supervisors knew that he was reckless or emotionally unstable or whatever loooong before it got to that point. They need to step up before he kills somebody.
They could start by getting rid of things like IQ maximums.
The medical industry solved this a century ago. Just do that same thing again.
Yet another instance of people with guns and a badge BEING the threat by not knowing how they are the problem.
First entering a private citizens home without a warrant.
Second, using deadly force where none was warranted.
ACAB
They harrassed a person into a corner and killed them for no other reason than they thought they had the 'authority' to do so.
Unacceptable under the united states constitution.
Traitor and insurrectionist charges should be applied alongside everything else.
An example must be made or no change will be affected.
May another victim of police brutality and violence rest in peace. May the victims family see justice done upon the perpetrating criminals.
Exactly. Is this the ‘good guy with a gun’ that Conservatives want in our schools? I wish I could say that this story is unbelievable, despite the shock I felt reading it.
You said it: ACAB. Fuck them all.
ACAB.
Don't call 911 for any problem that can't be solved with a fire hose or a moron with a gun.
They didn't call 911, the school "security" officer followed the kid home, escalated the situation, refused to leave after the kid and parents told her to, then just walked into this families home, escalating it even further before her backup decides to shoot the child 9 fucking times.
Meanwhile, the kid only ever picked up the knife because he felt threatened by the cops, which... he was. Stalking someone to their home and verbally accosting them while doing so, making vague threats; "you better not hit me," is seriously fucked up. She goaded an emotionally distressed teenager into having a reaction, and then killed him for it in front of his parents.
Jodi Hefti and Kyle Blunck should be in prison.
Thats what armed thugs do, they murder.
This is sad.
It's not easy being a 17-year old male in our society, and this person clearly did not get the help or guidance that he needed.
May he rest in peace.
This is sad.
I think this is more. This is justified anger over a crying injustice.
Shootings will continue until morale improves.
Pigs gonna be bastards apparently. Jesus fucking christ. At this point if I have a problem I'll talk it over with a person myself if i can. Less likely to be killed doing so.
Trump: depression is a crime! Everyone should smile and praise me. Or else...
Why are you shoehorning Trump into the discussion of an article that has absolutely nothing to do with him?
Yeah, we shouldn't hold the guy in charge accountable
Trump is in charge of The Nebraska police departments?
The US president directs the executive branch of the government ...
While he definitely promotes an atmosphere of policing with impunity and violence, he doesn’t have any authority over state police. The Governor of Tennessee directs the executive branch of Tennessee state government. /info
I’m as anti-Trump as anyone, but the suggestion that a president has any direct control in the hiring or supervision of local police is a bit absurd. Besides which, the shooting happened in 2024, so not while Trump was President. This is much more attributable to the broad, decades-long failings in police training and culture in the US than to the actions of any presidential administration.
And the executive branch of the federal government has nothing to do with a school's police department.
You're also ignoring the fact that Trump wasn't the president when it happened.