ReluctantMuskrat

joined 3 years ago

No, the one thing she wasn't was ignorant and the article doesn't give her that reprieve.

Way to ruin this for me. Now I'm not buying it until they give me LED eyes.

My wife loves our pihole setup so much I was forced to setup VPN access to the home network so she could block ads while traveling. Now our oldest daughter wants me to setup pihole for her house.

That video makes the robot argument stronger.

That's crazy! I had no idea they were charging that much now. Thanks for sharing!

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It only solves it if you can install it on those routers. Can you??

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Annoyed introverts are not convinced

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Legally they can't unless we grant them permission, and we shouldn't. Everyone should be offended if they even ask.

I'm not sure it's fear of lawsuits. We don't sue cell carriers for not monitoring text messages, and even if we did Snapchat's pockets are deep.

Snapchat isn't afraid of being sued... they're selling your data and may also assist the government identify "Anti-fa" agents.

So we should grant permission to our cell carrier to listen in on our calls and read our text messages too without warrant? Of course they'll sell your data too.

Don't give up your freedom and your constitutional right to privacy.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Except Snapchat doesn't have to surveil its customers and we really don't want it to.

Does Apple surveil iMessages? Does your cell carrier need to monitor your text messages? Does it listen to your calls to see if you make terroristic threats?

Some bad things might be prevented if we "listened in" to all communications and then triggered a police response when something alarming was said. But doing so is ripe for abuse by those in power as well and that's why warrants are required before surveillance and the invasion of your privacy is allowed. No warrant was necessary here because Snapchat makes you accept the surveillance under its terms of use, which all apps and cell carriers could technically do. And your Amazon Alexas. We don't want that. Without privacy you don't have freedom.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Acting as if nuclear power failures can't and haven't caused catastrophic problems doesn't help the argument. I can understand why people don't trust the government to properly regulate and police the industry when there are multiple incidents when that's been proven.

 

I'm dual-booting my machine right now with CachyOS linux and Windows 10. A have a few VeraCrypt volumes originally created on Windows on an NTFS formatted disk that I'm trying to use and I'm having issues with one in linux.

One volume when it's mounted in VeraCrypt isn't writable (4.9TB volume) and the other is (3.0TB). Both volumes reside on the same physical disk and in the same directory. The disk they resides on is writable and my user has read, write and execute enabled on both volume files and the mount directory. If I try to copy a file to the 4.9TB volume however I get a message that it's a read-only file system. Checking the volume properties in Dolphin it shows it's writable though.

Output from mount does suggest it's mounted read-only though. Here you can see the difference between the two volumes, 1 and 2:

veracrypt on /tmp/.veracrypt_aux_mnt1 type fuse.veracrypt (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other)

/dev/mapper/veracrypt1 on /run/media/veracrypt1 type ntfs (ro,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=0077,fmask=0077,iocharset=utf8)

veracrypt on /tmp/.veracrypt_aux_mnt2 type fuse.veracrypt (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other)

/dev/mapper/veracrypt2 on /run/media/veracrypt2 type exfat (rw,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1000,fmask=0077,dmask=0077,iocharset=utf8,errors=remount-ro)

So why exactly is VeraCrypt mounting it "ro" vs "rw" and is there anyway I can change that? Not sure if it matters but I'm using VeraCrypt version 1.26.24 on Linux, whereas on Windows I'm using 1.25.9.

 

Lately my home internet service has been experiencing brief periods of failure and I'm trying to understand what the root problem is and if there's anything I can do to fix it.

I have two piholes running on my home network providing DNS service and blocking. Lately I've been encountering brief internet outages, approximately once a day for the last week. Work laptop disconnects from VPN saying no internet and other devices show no internet either. Cable modem doesn't show it's lost connection though, and logging into my router it shows it has internet connectivity. Trying to ping a website shows the dns resolution isn't working. I can ping by IP address but not name. The outage usually resolves itself in approx 5 minutes, sometimes a little longer.

My piholes are setup to use Google, Cloudflare and Open DNS for dns service so I'm puzzled how my dns resolution suddenly starts failing. In theory if one's down, it'll use the others right? So how am I experiencing a dns outage? Is this a problem with something outside my network or something internal, or is there anything else I should do to diagnose and fix it?

 

I'm looking to install Linux on our home laptop and see if I can convince my wife to migrate off Windows. Since I'm not sure there won't be times we need or want to boot back into Windows, I want to set it up so we can dual boot. The laptop only has a spot for one drive however so I can't use two drives and chose them with the bios. I know in the past Windows has been problematic with dual boot setups on a single drive, corrupting the boot drive following updates and what-not. I'd really like to avoid that if possible.

Any suggestions on how best to go about it, or something I should at least avoid because it's known to be problematic?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world to c/linuxmint@lemmy.ml
 

Worked with linux servers plenty with a development job but new to running at home and using a desktop interface. I'm using RDP to access the machine and have run into a few issues I'm not sure how to solve.

First, I'm using Mate and I've noticed issues with have the panel/task bar disappearing. When the machine first boots my user account is logged in and if I then RDP into the machine, the panel doesn't show. If I go to the machine physically and logout, then when I RDP in I can see the panel, but that's a hassle. Seems only one instance of the panel with run. Do I need to create a different user to use with RDP to avoid this? Other options?

Second, physically working on the machine I can go into the network settings and make changes. However when I RDP into the machine - using the same user account - the widget to let me see and edit the details of the network interface is disabled. Why is it that a physical session seems to have sudo access through the UI but an RDP session doesn't? Can I change this too?

view more: next ›