Way to ruin this for me. Now I'm not buying it until they give me LED eyes.
ReluctantMuskrat
My wife loves our pihole setup so much I was forced to setup VPN access to the home network so she could block ads while traveling. Now our oldest daughter wants me to setup pihole for her house.
That video makes the robot argument stronger.
That's crazy! I had no idea they were charging that much now. Thanks for sharing!
It only solves it if you can install it on those routers. Can you??
Annoyed introverts are not convinced
Legally they can't unless we grant them permission, and we shouldn't. Everyone should be offended if they even ask.
I'm not sure it's fear of lawsuits. We don't sue cell carriers for not monitoring text messages, and even if we did Snapchat's pockets are deep.
Snapchat isn't afraid of being sued... they're selling your data and may also assist the government identify "Anti-fa" agents.
So we should grant permission to our cell carrier to listen in on our calls and read our text messages too without warrant? Of course they'll sell your data too.
Don't give up your freedom and your constitutional right to privacy.
Except Snapchat doesn't have to surveil its customers and we really don't want it to.
Does Apple surveil iMessages? Does your cell carrier need to monitor your text messages? Does it listen to your calls to see if you make terroristic threats?
Some bad things might be prevented if we "listened in" to all communications and then triggered a police response when something alarming was said. But doing so is ripe for abuse by those in power as well and that's why warrants are required before surveillance and the invasion of your privacy is allowed. No warrant was necessary here because Snapchat makes you accept the surveillance under its terms of use, which all apps and cell carriers could technically do. And your Amazon Alexas. We don't want that. Without privacy you don't have freedom.
Acting as if nuclear power failures can't and haven't caused catastrophic problems doesn't help the argument. I can understand why people don't trust the government to properly regulate and police the industry when there are multiple incidents when that's been proven.
No, the one thing she wasn't was ignorant and the article doesn't give her that reprieve.