this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
462 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

18851 readers
1895 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Context: He's in the files

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

People have been getting taller over time. Hawking didn't book a big enough venue.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

the reason we don't have time travelers is that the past is no more concrete than the future. [Current science disagrees with the idea that] just like there are infinite potential futures, there are an infinity of potential pasts that could have evolved into the present [instead insisting that the entire past is fully embedded in the present]. [It's not supported by any current theories that] the probability of reaching a particular past is essentially zero.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 4 hours ago

I vehemently disagree with many worlds theory. I think its a total mindfuck. However I do think that the future influences the present and the past.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like somebody has read Anathem.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Every word Neal Stephenson ever wrote is fucking classic

Except The Big U , that was tripe

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 21 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel? I'd much rather go look at dinosaurs, or visit the construction of the pyramids, or go listen to Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech.

Even if my goal was to meet a single scientist, I think I'd personally pick any other. Pliny the Elder, Marie Curie, Albert Einstein...

Not to be rude to Mr. Hawking (well, maybe he deserves it, I don't know what got him in to the Epstein files...), but a thorougly average party is simply not likely to attract very many time travellers.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel?

Not only that, apparently the machine he used to speak was rather difficult to use quickly, and drafting responses could take hours or days depending on how much needed said. Pretty much all of his appearances after he was unable to use his voice were heavily scripted ahead of time.

So unless you're visiting Steven Hawking when he still could talk, it'd be pretty boring as you couldn't have a proper back-and-forth conversation

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago

I think his party would attract at least a few curiosity seekers.

On the other hand, it would likely include time travellers from various future eras, perhaps hundreds, or even thousands of years apart. Future time travel would have to be heavily regulated, to keep unauthorized people from screwing up the time line. So perhaps future time travellers are expressly forbidden from having contact with other time travellers, making Hawking's party the one place that time travellers are NOT allowed to visit.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, but ol epsein wasn't just a monstrous blackmailing mossad pedo rapist killer. He was into science for the mossad.

[–] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 20 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly, even if time travel were theoretically possible to be invented, there's also a high chance that we're just going to destroy ourselves before we get to that point anyway.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

and a mathematical inevitability that eventually we will destroy our own past that gives rise to time travel

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

Also, what if it uses a lot of resources and potential time travelers didn't want to waste them to go to parties (thus further progressing your hypothetical conundrum)?

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

You might destroy yourselves but the time traveler would be safe trust me.

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 21 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I have thoughts.

It was ridiculous that Hawking thought a time traveler would make it to his party for several reasons. There are a few models of time travel, and only one of them has an internal logic that allows for traveling without paradoxical consequences; multiversal divergence.

Our version of the time traveler party was one of an infinite amount of time traveler parties that hawking hosted throughout the multiverse. A time traveler would be traveling to that time like picking a grain of sand on a beach, where each grain of sand is a near identical party to the last.

As our version of the party diverges from the realities with time travelers who chose to travel to the hawking party, there would be a diminishing set of infinities containing time travelers that were attempting the journey.

Thus while the chances of a time traveler going to the party are 100%, the party being our version of the party approach 0 infinitely fast.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Hawking knew no one was going to show up. It was done as a sort of proof against it. He just thought it was more likely then the existence of god.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

it would frankly be dumb not to throw the party, because at worst you just have a bit of a weird boring party, and at best you meet some fucking time travellers

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

But what if the time travellers start asking for your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle?

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Say, that's what he said at the party!

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

You're missing the point completely.

You do not actually know if "paradoxical consequences" are a thing. Logic might, like everything we believe right now, turn out not to be how the world works.

Stopping yourself from doing an experiment because "current knowledge makes it seem impossible" is how science never advances.

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I have no idea what you're arguing against, or what point you think I've missed.

Have you assumed that I have discounted other models because of the model I chose for my comment? Bah! You assume too much.

I did not state that doing the experiment was a bad thing; my comment was in humor even!

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

Well, usually if people call something "ridiculous" they mean that it's so bad that it's funny, i.e. not worth considering.

In any case, I'm not really arguing either, you assume too much!

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You can spend your entire life thinking about it and you Will never reach a definitive answer. Or, you can spend a day to set up an experiment and throw a party.

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 44 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Now, I’m speaking hypothetically, legally, and for educational purposes only… you fast-forward a few decades and suddenly certain names appear in court documents and flight logs, not convictions, not proof of wrongdoing, just… associations. Enough to make a careful chrononaut say, ‘You know what? I’m not popping back in time to shake hands and eat shrimp.’

The absence at that party wasn’t evidence that time travel failed. It was evidence that it worked, and everyone who could come already knew how the story looked later.

History doesn’t just judge actions. It judges proximity. And no self-respecting time traveler shows up early to something that turns awkward in hindsight.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

More pragmatically, time travel for a casual party would be risky because you’re carrying germs many generations apart. Time travelers would wear full-body suits or risk dramatically altering history. They could not drink or eat anything.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Spoiler Alert: the time travelers are the ones who took the picture of Hawking.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 98 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (11 children)

Is it because our solar system is hurdling through space at over 1.5 million miles per hour, so anyone who time travels will find themselves alone in an empty void?

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 88 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (10 children)

There's no universal frame of reference. Any theoretical time travel would likely need a beacon of some sort to calibrate their arrival point, meaning you couldn't travel back beyond the point time travel was established.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You can easily cross calculate between various, inertial frames of reference. The problem is that earth isn't sitting still in an inertial frame. We spin around the sun, and we orbit the center of our galaxy. We also get nudged about by the pull of other stars.

Tracking a time jump (or technically a time-space jump) would be easy, if you just wanted to be within the solar system. With measurements the earth-moon gap would not be too hard. Hitting a surface exactly would be another story. Miss by a meter and your cut in half by a wall or floor.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 35 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

There is also the idea that time machines work like telephones. You need to have a receiving end made first before you can call it.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Like that short story with the lead marble?

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago

Or that Austin Powers movie

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 63 points 19 hours ago (11 children)

Listen, dude: I’ve got a lot more concerts in my list before I get to your lame-ass party.

Would you have missed Metallica in Moscow for some party you assumed nobody would attend? Fuck no.

Now if you’ll excuse me I’m gonna go sell all your grandmothers some really strong modern weed to get into Hendrix, New Year’s Eve, 1969.

Can’t wait to hear Machine Gun live.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 26 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

lame-ass party

Since the time traveler would be from the future, he'd have already known that nobody went to the party.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

XKCD rule: lame ass-party.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I see what you did there 🐴😂

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›