this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
637 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10494 readers
3794 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The guy's page is full of trolling and rage bait. It's not serious

It still appeared serious enough to be upvoted by 700 people. I guess this speaks more on how the sanity of linkedin users is perceived than it speaks on the validity of the situation. And yeh, linkedin users are a bit fucked in the head.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm mad because a child's creation caused damage to my newly bought, overpriced 2026 Redneck Sports Car™ and I'm going to resort to litigation! /s

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

The defendant has been found guilty. The plaintiff is awarded $4.37 to be paid directly from the defendants allowance over the course of the next year.

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

Something similar happened several years ago with a tree stump base:

https://youtu.be/2fxGC_VM6yE

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 47 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago
[–] Rato@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

I enjoyed that story, thanks

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 78 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So Mark Majeski purposefully crashed his car into a static object and blames someone else for the consequences of his own actions?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

Validity of his anger depends on where the snowman was placed before the hit: if it was on the road...

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 13 points 8 hours ago

Great example of american values.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 45 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'd be surprised if there were any legal consequences for something like this. It's not a "booby trap" in the traditional sense where it poses a danger to legitimate visitors or emergency responders entering a property. It is a solid structure inside another (seemingly less solid) structure. You should already not be trying to ram into it. It poses zero risk to anyone that doesn't already intent to maliciously destroy the apparently less solid structure.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

And it plausibly helps support the snow. There is a legitimate purpose.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

we have issues in the UK with something like this. if you pay road tax you can park anywhere that isn't parking controlled, including outside peoples houses (so long as you're not restricting their access to the highway). some homeowners started putting traffic cones out to "reserve" the spot outside their homes (you cant legally do this btw).

People would just push them out of the way with their cars so homeowners started filling them with concrete.

Putting one of those in the road absolutely can and does get you in trouble

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't it depend where the obstacle is, though? I'm assuming these are cars parking on the road, or at least a shoulder or driveway. If the cars are pulling up onto a front lawn and parking under the kitchen window of a house, that's entirely different. I'm pretty sure filling a traffic cone with concrete and placing it in a path a car is expected to drive on is going to get you in trouble anywhere. I doubt building a snowman with a stump or concrete core in the middle of a lawn on private property would get you in trouble in most places.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It would be illegal for others to park if it was actually on the property people want to own the public road next to their property

[–] Jhogenbaum@leminal.space 34 points 9 hours ago

Did they build this snowman in a roadway? If so, he has a case but "could've" (should've) avoided the obstacle... If the snowman was not built in a roadway: gtfo

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 105 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

What would make you think driving through a snowman is a good idea to begin with? You'd have to be driving through a yard or at least jumping a curb. Take the guy's license away for reckless driving.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 33 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

it's a Mustang, it has to be satire

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 hours ago

more importantly, you are going to damage your car even if the snowman is not reinforced. what moron would do that?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 482 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

If you plow through a snowman with your car, you're an asshole. If you do it with your brand new sports car, you're a stupid asshole.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago

I’d have thought a snowman would do a fair bit of damage to a car anyway.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 242 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Let me add one more: he's done this several times already which is the reason the kids added bricks in the first place.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Where are these snowmen situated?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 89 points 11 hours ago

Its like a honeypot for assholes.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of my grandfather, these kids kept knocking his mailbox down with baseball bats. After the second time it was hit, he put up a new one filled with concrete. The very next morning there was half a wooden baseball bat on the ground and a dent in the mailbox. They never did it again.

I've heard basically the same story before from a local incident, but with the added bonus of the other side: they used a metal bat and the kid dislocated his arm and was almost pulled right out of the car.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 133 points 14 hours ago

Same type of person would drive through a pile of leaves not thinking if there were kids in it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 89 points 12 hours ago (12 children)

My cousins used to live on a street with massive trees that dropped tons of leaves every autumn. The city would have special service days where everyone rakes the leaves into big piles in the street and street sweepers would come vacuum them up.

Hooligans liked the drive through the big piles in the middle of the night. I honestly kinda see the appeal, who could resist. Anyway, they started to doing the same thing. Piles of cinder blocks under some of them. I was staying with them one night and we heard some horrible carnage, came out to find some sedan high centered on a pile of cinder blocks with the bumper hanging off.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

There was a news story some years back about a little girl who was killed when her father did this. She was playing in a pile of leaves and her dad was unaware of that. He drove through the pile of leaves and ... yeah, that was that. :(

Trying to find the original news story, I'm finding multiple instances of this sort of thing happening. Which is even more heartbreaking.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Here's the story.

What's wild is it's only one of several I found like this. People out there, train your kids to not lay in leaf piles AND not to drive through them.

https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/man-drives-over-leaf-pile-where-his-daughter-was-hiding-killing-her/83-402225200

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Fuck Cars, and asshole dickheads in particular who get thrills running over snowmen and scaring off cyclists and pedestrians. Deserves losing his braggart machine.

[–] jessicablaze@lemmynsfw.com 191 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

Unless the snowman was built in the road, the driver is at fault not the people that created the snowman.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 162 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (19 children)

Even in case of a "usual" snowman, you can easily crack plastic bodyparts or dent metal ones. This is not GTA, where you just have to remember which items are breakable and which are not

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›