this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
579 points (96.2% liked)
News
34874 readers
4116 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Feels like acceptance came first, if not prior.
Ok but imagine charlie kirk is your husband and he dies. You'd be happy, too.
He would do the same if she died too
Two shit peas in a shit pod.
Wow well I guess marrying a Mossad honey pot is a bad idea
Quick someone save Kash Patel!
...actually nah it's fine.
I couldn't find anything about her links to Mossad online. Source?
Her kids are going to need a lot of therapy.
I’m no conspiracy theorist but there is apparently a cia training video out there with Erika Kirk in it…she was just his handler y’all
Though at this point that actually sounds plausible, it's still rather conspiratorial at the least.
Having said that, yeah it wouldn't surprise me
What we VAN all agree on is that this bitch is one cold narcissistic psychopath. It's almost enough to feel sorry for Charlie. Almost... But not.
Indeed we van
Sounds like we might have a motive for Charlie's death.
Oh look, stereotypically evil person, …turns out to be stereotypically evil.
Her stare is enough. Even it gave Candace Owens the creeps. Nicki went silent after calling Vance the assassin.
A good magahat never lets a tragedy and grief get in the way of turning a profit. I too am impressed by the profits made........
It’s not this audio that exposed her as a psychopath, it’s every singe public appearance she’s made since his death. Without skipping a beat she capitalized on her husband’s assassination immediately after it happened. Organizing events, “fundraisers”, podcasts, hook ups with the vice president, twitter beef with other grifters doing the same, etc, etc.
I’m never going to tell anyone how to grieve but you can’t convince me someone this excited about her husband’s public execution is grieving
Honestly, how am I supposed to see anyone who willingly married Charlie Kirk as anything but a vile human being. She could be dressed in all black until her dying day having taken a vow of silence in the wake of his passing, and her reputation would still deserve the Eva Braun treatment in my book. Her husband was a horrible person and any honoring of his death is the honoring of a piece of garbage. I cannot determine how another person is feeling, but I don't care how the wife of Charlie Kirk is feeling because I already know all the relevant facts about her. She's the wife of Charlie Kirk and that's enough.
Shitbag man has shitbag wife. More at 11.
I'm getting you fired. That was literally my favorite racist podcaster.
A recording just reaffirms that she is a true psychopath, rather than through heresay
load more comments
(1 replies)
Lots of people were happy he died, why are people mad at her?
She's been pretending to be a grieving in widow to keep the scam going.
Cmon We all knew she was fucked up sociopath.
Exactly...nothing surprising here.
Conservatives completely lack empathy, but she seems to completely lack all emotions.
Her husband getting a hole through the neck was the event of the century for her too?
Looks like I have something in common with Erika Kuck.
load more comments
(1 replies)
People grieve their own way. Being excited about how much money you are going to make from the memorial for your dead husband is not a normal reaction. It could be a mental retreat as a coping mechanism. It really could be. However, the way conservative identities act when they aren’t in mourning, highly suggests this isn’t a coping mechanism, just naked exploitation of other peoples sympathy.
load more comments
(4 replies)
My theory, Charlie wasn't always great to her and she is happy he is gone but not willing to admit that his misogyny actually hurt her at times.
That's a very charitable interpretation.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Creepy Mossad honeypot wife/handler
The list of articles at the end is just Candace Owens talking about other conspiracy theories. This isn't news, why are you wasting peoples time with this? And why are people upvoting this?
Very likely they're just reading the lemmy headline, upvoting and moving on without opening thread or link. Just the nature of link aggregator sites
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I wish she hadn't had to mourn her husband for long because she would have been the next one in front of the firing squad.
If this is true and indicative of anything other than just going through the processing of it [1] I wonder if that's how she was able to forgive the shooter so quickly.
[1] Grief can be a very weird thing and the reactions you have can surprise you - giggling does not necessarily mean she was truly ecstatic over the murder of her husband. I'm willing to give a lot of grace here - processing something like this is not something one does in the most rational and stepwise of ways. As others have pointed out, it can seem truly surreal, especially at first.
You don't giggle when you grieve someone's death
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›