this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
678 points (97.2% liked)

Political Memes

11857 readers
1346 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

#GeneralStrike2026

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 65 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Strikes are organized through unions not hashtags.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (6 children)

We don't have unions anymore. Reagan busted them.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 months ago

All we can do is rebuild.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Not an American, what happened? How does a president just remove unions?

[–] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

General strikes don't require you to be in a union. They do require a larger amount of organizing than simply having a lot of the workforce in unions though so...

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Strikes require unity across a workforce.

If some workers in a local context work instead of participating in a strike, then the business is not pressured to acquiesce, and the sacrifice is in vain.

Striking in any case results in lost pay, which promotes fear and threatens survival. Solidarity improves morale and saves lives.

Fostering unity and solidarity is among the essential functions of a union.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 59 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Next nationwide 50501 protest is a national walk-out on Jan 20th.

We'll see you there, right?

[–] leftist_lawyer@lemmy.today 30 points 4 months ago

I'm my own boss. It's never an issue. Thanks for the tip. Just joined my state's 50501 group.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

nationwide 50501 protest

That isn't all. There is the Tax Strike that many MAGAs are pushing. There are "Stop the Trump Takeover" events. There are also other actions to rein in the dictator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Thanks for this. I’m in

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Some leftists talk about a general strike like its the rapture. You need the ground work done. We've done none of the work broadly to make something like that feasible. Strikers need economic and legal leverage, they'd have basically none if they tried.

You have to walk before you run.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Anytime I see posts talking about a general strike I equate to "thoughts and prayers".

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Yes, but also its worse. They are demanding people shoot themselves in the crotch and saying we're cowards for not shooting ourselves in the crotch.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (9 children)

A general strike would need to be huge to work. And yet we see folk bitching that the No Kings rallies "did nothing", as if.just getting America to stand up wasn't an accomplishment.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

In the USA health insurance is tied to work; if you're fired "with cause" (like from general strike) you don't have health insurance or any "unemployment".

They don't make these laws without reason, they know what they're doing. The USA is a plutocracy designed to squash unions, and does a pretty good job of it

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Or goto the capitol and kick them out... Vs wasting time.

[–] NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago (10 children)

While I wholeheartedly agree with both your sentiment of anger and who that anger should be directed toward, I must point out that what you propose is not realistic. We're just not at that point, nor is there sufficient political will to do so. Protests/walkout aren't a waste of time since they are actionable steps to growing movements that enact systemic change. The point of these demonstrations isn't to enact direct change, but to bring people together to organize.

Besides, how would you get enough people together to do as you suggest if getting people together to organize is "wasting time"?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I'm gonna end up committing sui before the general American populace does a gen strike.

No one should be buying from Amazon. Start with one big company, simple yeah? No, because post Christmas season now, the amount of people who still use amazon has not changed at all. For me sure, the general populace? They're fucking morons. Consume consume consume. I'm gonna consume myself from the inside out. These rat bitches only care about themselves. American individualism is a cancer.

I'm struggling to exist in this. I cannot tell you how much these assholes don't care.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't corporate social media, you can say suicide there's no algorithm to punish you.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

Fair. I didn't write it like that for algorithm sake or whatever. I'm just so familiar with the term I shortened it lol "to commit the sui". It's just dark humor/play on words. Fuck the algorithm

[–] Syndication@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm struggling with the same type of thoughts and feel suicidal every day now. Every headline I read is another reason I dont want to live anymore. You're not going crazy, the world is. I know it might seem counter productive to not stay in the loop of things, but I try to take a break from all social media and news every once in awhile to keep my sanity. I love lemmy and the progressive ideas that are shared on here on a daily basis, but the news you read can make you feel powerless and over these big societal issues that don't have an immediate solution.

I really hope you feel better soon, your hearts in the right place. The fediverse is the only real place where I can reliably find empathic people looking out for one another. I wish I could have offered more sound advice as I can barely keep it together myself too, but make sure you have people you can talk about this in your life. Unfortunately I can't afford meds or therapy so I've been depending on my friends and family to help keep me sane. Stay safe!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's classic prisoner's dilemma from game theory. Will my participation matter against the millions of people who won't ever care? Realistically no. But participating will hurt me financially because it takes away a low-cost alternative. There's a ton of stuff I can't buy locally at any cost, or can but at a much higher cost. If I go buy these things on individual websites, I'll pay shipping, negating savings. So, why would I hurt myself financially to affect no change, when others will take advantage of the system without ever caring? It just gives them an advantage over me on an individual level. Even if I convinced 1,000 people to act like me, meaningful change to the system isn't affected, only weakening of our group. And honestly that means 1,000 people who have less resources to affect OTHER change with.

Prisoner's dilemma doesn't mean that the prisoners are bad or evil, it just means there are too many individuals acting in self-interest. We are too big a country. Too big a world population.

The solution is top-down, we have to elect leaders who then make rules we ALL abide by for our own benefit at the macro level. That's the only way problems of this scale can be changed anymore. And the systems themselves know this and factor it in, locking us out. Late stage capitalism is called "late stage" for a reason, it's too late for a cure.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You don't need amazon. You can go without. A conversation I heard in a waiting room this morning between two women sharing what they did for thier holiday, "oh we bought this 25 day activity book thing off amazon, we did most of them but some days we just did our own thing". You don't need that. You don't need these things.

You need food, shelter, and love.

All I hear when people say "but there's no cheap alternative" is "I care about my comfort more than anyone else's."

Brick by brick it get's built. It would make a difference if we all participated. Fuck prisoners dilemma, your comment reads of learned helplessness and it's exactly why the states won't see a general strike. It's frankly pathetic and why I feel so helpless/hopeless for the future. Just say you don't care the oligarchs rule the world and you like the hierarchy. It's much more concise. "Be a good consumer and do nothing to help".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

General Strike? My friend, we aren’t even in unions right now! It will take years to build that kind of power.

Let’s focus on building a new mass political party that does not exist in the wilderness, then we can work to that point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

A general strike requires organization, but US society is completely atomized.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I’m all for it but I feel that a large population of the country is just not gonna care enough to get activated. I would love to be proven wrong, this needs to be massive to the point it makes the no kings protest look like a farmer market.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If anyone thinks a strike is actually happening with the state of things then they are incredibly naive and do not understand just how much foundational effort and structuring needs to be in place first for that to even be considered a possibility, much less actualized.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

My big question with a grassroots general strike is who negotiates for us? We'll all have different "good enough" goals that would get us back to work. Seems like we'd need a strong central leader speaking for everyone....

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

That’s easy Bernie and AOC

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I work in the care industry, my clients need support 24/7 and there are only so much staff around. Should I leave my clients to their own designs‽

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

"The most vulnerable should pay for the revolution." People aren't just stupid, liberals have spent the last century implementing anti-popular-labour-action measures. A general strike would require people who cannot afford to survive to risk what little they have, mutual aid networks and consequences for those in positions of power must exist in order for that risk to be minimized.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

These kinds of things tend not to happen until people are starving and have nothing left to lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well you would need strong unions and a non apathetic population to pull off a general strike.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

After the holidays would be a hilariously well timed general strike.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›