Thanks for suggesting the additional reading.
In my comment I was trying simply to critique the posted video.
Thanks for suggesting the additional reading.
In my comment I was trying simply to critique the posted video.
We can try one last time for you to lend some coherence to the discussion.
You hollered vapidly about my not having a plan.
Do you have some kind of plan, that you think is relevant to share?
My plan is to get a good night's sleep.
What's your plan?
States function according to their strategic interests and trade relations, not as pot luck dinners.
Trump does nothing himself. Sham justice carries the support of the entire political establishment.
Your objection is an incoherent non sequitur.
It was never much more than a tool to repress the poor and marginalized.
The speaker seems to reject the understanding of solar punk as strictly an aesthetic, but her deeper representation seems as simply a capture of contemporary anarcho-communism. The apparent contradiction exposes a dilemma, of whether solar punk offers novel concepts but all in the form of aesthetic, versus its simply being a new packaging of preexisting concepts.
I feel we have yet to be offered any new concepts beyond mere aesthetic.
The emphasis on implementing slow living and adapting indigenous practices seems particularly aligned with the spirit of solar punk, but they also are not novel to its development.
You should expect that a kangeroo court has already been arranged.
The relationship of Latin states with the US has never been of negotiation between equal peers. South and Central America are subjugated under the colonialism of the US. They are kept poor because their economies are structured to be dependent on trade with the US.
The true effect will be to affirm the urgency for such states to develop deeper integration with the Russia-China power axis.
I care about all abuse
I guess just fuck Venezuela then
I think you are imagining things.
Since you don’t believe in participating in the poltical process
How well is that working?
Organizing and voting are fine, but when there are two candidates who support genocide, and none who supports universal healthcare, which one do you suppose represents you?