this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
257 points (97.1% liked)

Buy European

9929 readers
201 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat of this community

Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:

Banner credits: BYTEAlliance

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
maam@feddit.uk
alex@jlai.lu
circledot@feddit.org
Argyle13@lemmy.world
meldrik@lemmy.wtf
Sunshine@piefed.ca
Kjell@lemmy.world
257
Spotify subscriptions should be boycotted as if it were a US-based company (lemmy.zip)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was shocked to learn that Spotify was headquartered in Sweden. Until I read about Spotify and their CEO I had assumed they were based in America because to me they were just like all the other big tech companies in terms of lack of morals and ethics.

Spotify has a deal with Joe Rogan worth up to $250 million according to an article published in Variety. This was the deal that was signed in 2024. They've previously given Joe Rogan other very lucrative deals giving Rogan a massive platform and funding to spread disinformation, propaganda and lies and don't forget things like saying the N word.

So by using Spotify you're funding Joe Rogan who as we all know is based in America.

But that's not the only way your money was used to support the far-right in America. Spotify donated to Trump's inauguration. Do you want your money being used to bribe Trump?

In addition Spotify has also garnered controversy for allowing ICE recruitment ads and is already being boycotted by groups such as Indivisible.

Also let's talk about Daniel Ek who was until recently their CEO but will still be very involved with Spotify. Was he born in Sweden? Yes. But what are his values like? Are they different from American billionaires? "Daniel Ek warns Sweden that Spotify may be forced to grow elsewhere" hmmmm.... I kind of having a feeling that might be a no.

Another thing is I researched how many employees Spotify has in each country and multiple websites such as this one claimed they have the most in the United States. At the end of the day how much of a European company is Spotify if they just have their headquartes in Sweden and is from what I've read mostly used for executives and operations?

You know what they say "if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, then it probably is a duck". I personally don't see any reason for treating Spotify different from all the US-based big tech companies but I'll admit at the end of the day it is true they are headquartered in the EU so I propose a compromise: use Spotify as much as you like as long as you're using the free version and using the website (not the app which has more ability to collect data and track you) with an ad blocker such as uBlock Origin. Cancel your subscriptions. When you cancel mention that you don't like your money being used to fund disinformation via paying Joe Rogan so much money.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] pinhead77@piefed.social 67 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Besides the political aspects... The main reason why Spotify should be boycotted is the fact that they exploit artists (small and large artists receive virtually nothing for their streamed music) and flood the market with AI-generated music...

[โ€“] pinhead77@piefed.social 27 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Here's a good read about streaming payouts in 2025: https://rebelmusicdistribution.com/2025/08/22/which-streaming-service-pays-the-most-per-1000-streams-in-2025-top-5-platforms/

Qobuz (who payout the most beside Napster) is a European company.

load more comments (11 replies)
[โ€“] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My family canceled our plan a few months ago due to the AI weapons investment. Iโ€™ve switched back to an mp3 player because my phone doesnโ€™t have adequate storage for a music library.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People look at me like I'm crazy when I say I just buy music (usually from Bandcamp). It's not always more expensive, I get to keep the files drm free, and the people making music get paid

[โ€“] Kjell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buying can be cheaper depending on how much new music you are listening too. And it is probably more expensive in the beginning when you don't have anything in your own library. But after some time you can skip months without buying anything.

How is the quality of the music from Bandcamp?

[โ€“] ranzispa@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You generally get the FLAC recording in bandcamp. I do buy there, but noway it is cheaper than Spotify: one album will generally go around 10-15โ‚ฌ, while I believe Spotify is some 10โ‚ฌ/month.

But then again, I have thousands of albums in my library, probably I could stop buying music and be good for a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] simsala@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Just started doing this too and hosting it on our family jellyfin server. Feels so much better

[โ€“] roserose56@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For anyone looking alternative apart from offline mp3's and Torrenting, check Qobuz, Tidal, Deezer and BandCamp.

[โ€“] Europellinore@europe.pub 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And SoundCloud

[โ€“] roserose56@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Yes soundcloud!

[โ€“] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I've switched to Tidal a few months ago when Spotify increased prices. Mainly for reasons like this. I wouldn't recommend them here, though. It's an US company and for some reason the majority owner is some financial technology company since a few years. But we certainly do have alternatives to Spotify and those services work just fine.

[โ€“] golli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think for people wanting to switch off Spotify, but stay with something European, Qobuz could be worth a look as they are from France and have similar focus on better audio quality similar to tidal.

[โ€“] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Long time Spotify subscriber who started using Qobuz when I found out Spotify was playing ICE recruitment ads. Having a hard time with the selection of music. I think Qobuz has a little over 100 million tracks and Spotify has 260 million. The sound quality on Qobuz is off the charts though. Hoping to download my Spotify library and set up a self-hosted alternative soon.

[โ€“] golli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Have you found the smaller selection to be an issue in practice? Because most of what's on Spotify never gets played, so the raw numbers without context don't really give an answer to how good the selection is.

Since Anna's archive recently downloaded most of Spotify we got some context to the statistics. See for example here. Only a fraction of those 260 million get listened to. And the number alone doesn't tell how many of the actually relevant tracks are on a streaming service.

[โ€“] tekdeb@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am in a similar situation as the one you're asking here and I have sadly found Qobuz's selection too lacking in practice for me to use it which is a real shame because there's a lot to like about it. For example, attempting to import my favourite songs playlist from Spotify or Apple Music to Qobuz resulted in only ~60% being carried over. The majority of my missing songs were from a large variety of japanese artists or very niche genres like beatboxing, so I think most people would find their selection perfectly fine.

[โ€“] golli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Based on the other replies it seems indeed like niche genres and non English music seems to be a weak spot, which really is unfortunate. Only 60% success rate in your case is indeed a deal breaker.

[โ€“] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Have you found the smaller selection to be an issue in practice?

Yes. I listen primarily to electronic music, a decent amount of it is from lesser-known artists, and I regularly find tracks I really like that Spotify has and Qobuz doesn't. Most recently Certified by EAZYBAKED.

[โ€“] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I tried Qobuz, but the lack of the Finnish music was disappointing me. I mainly listen to the older rock and pop music.

[โ€“] golli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is sad to hear and based on the other replies it seems not too uncommon that something niche is missing.

Imo it's really fascinating how music streaming is different in that regard compared to video streaming. Where more people are just happy with whatever e.g. Netflix offers them and don't seem to mind too much, if one particular thing isn't on their service.

But I guess the fact that in regards to music everyone has a slightly different taste and each one really wants that particular, different niche artist is what so far has prevented a similar fragmentation of services happening as we see with video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago

Tidal was bought by Jay-Z. It's no longer European. There's a short documentary about it on youtube. (or you can just read the wikipedia article).

[โ€“] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't boycott them, I never had Spotify to begin with. :(

[โ€“] phneutral@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Youโ€˜ve boycotted them your whole life! Cheers!

[โ€“] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago

Theyโ€™re based in Sweden, though traded on the US stock market, and have a lot of staff in the US. Also, their union-busting policies (in Sweden and elsewhere) are out of step with Swedish industrial relations norms.

[โ€“] Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

lol sweden is an oligarcs dream nowadays

[โ€“] ironblossom@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

lol, no. This is what happens when you allow companies to get too large, they pervert everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Same with Klarna, avoid it too if you can.

[โ€“] Lanske@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Ive been boycotting Spotify since the inauguration of Trump. Should have done it earlier. Using Qobuz now for streaming, but mainly buy stuff via artists or bandcamp

[โ€“] Babalugats@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Would we call Apple an Irish company because they evade taxes in Ireland?

You've lost me there. I won't disagree with your points, but I am curious...

Spotify was created and built in Sweden by Swedish people. I know nothing about what you are referring to regarding the far right and Joe Rogan etc. - I have heard of him, but I do not know anything about him, what he looks like or what he has actually said about anything. I do know that (I think) he is very far right in his opinion.

But... Can the far left or whoever are the opposite of these extreme politics not just pay for advertisements or produce popular content etc. on the same platform, would spotify take their money, allow their content for profit?

Or

Are spotify exclusively working and promoting the far right?

I don't agree with shutting down somebody or something because you don't agree with them or it. I believe it could be far more effective and better for everyone if you explain why you think somebody is wrong in what they are saying, and what way you think it would be better to do something that they are talking about.

The Irish government allowing Apple, Google, Amazon and other big tech to not pay any taxes whilst not really helping the country as a whole is a good reason for the Irish to dislike them, but they (the government) believe that the employment - and more importantly the money that they bring to them is more important than their countries future. It will not be 20 years before they have all pulled out and left Ireland like one of the barren states in the U.S., devoid of employment, with both Dublin and Cork falling into Urban decay.

It is possible to agree with a little bit of one and little bit of the other, and a lot of neither. No point in silencing one to make your voice louder. Just make your points better.

[โ€“] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I see your point about my Apple example. I ended up thinking about this more and removed it from my post because it's not a good example.

I will say I did research where Spotify has the most employees and it says they have the most in the United States so it's not built solely by Swedish people. In fact I suspect the percentage of Spotify built by Swedish people to be somewhat low or very likely less than 50% but I don't have enough information to be sure on this, this is conjecture on my part.

For far-right I'm saying that Trump is far-right so supporting Trump is supporting the far-right in America.

Joe Rogan actually isn't the most extreme right wing person. What I object to most is his willingness to spread disinformation. Here's a good article about him: https://www.mediamatters.org/joe-rogan-experience/joe-rogan-wrapped-year-covid-19-misinformation-right-wing-myths-and-anti-trans

In fact the very first line in the article is "Joe Rogan: โ€œYou can say whatever you want. Weโ€™re on Spotify.โ€".

I suspect that yes the "far-left" would be allowed to use Spotify and a quick glance seems to show that it's allowed.

About shutting things down because of disagreements I understand you there. If someone believed all bike sheds should be painted blue and someone else thought they should be painted green in that case it's likely blue advocates would try to shut down the green advocate's podcasts simply due to disagreements even thought it would be wrong to do so.

But now let's imagine this: the people in favor of blue paint started to be dishonest by spreading disinformation and advocated for harming people who wanted green paint. Isn't that different morally? I do thank platforms should take a stance against disinformation.

Also with my paint example neither opinion causes harm to society. What happens if someone advocates for things that are harmful to others like anti-vax? That has real world consequences.

About trying to make better points that's also a good point, no matter if Rogan is allowed or not we should be doing this.

[โ€“] Babalugats@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

I do thank platforms should take a stance against disinformation.

Definitely. That should be enforced more. Companies should be fined every time they allow their platform to be used to spread disinformation. โ‚ฌ1 for every person believed to have read/listened/viewed something. If 500,000 people viewed it and it spread to millions, then obviously the larger effect should have a deeper reach into their pockets.

[โ€“] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

There is no "far left" - not in the sense of the organised "far right", that is, with massive financiers behind it - because what could be considered far left is generally a group of fringe edgelords who firmly believe that e.g Russia, North Korea or China are 1, prime examples of well implemented communism 2, these countries can do no wrong 3, we should all bow to them and follow their ways. Basically just as batshit as the far right, but considerably smaller in numbers and even more excluded as the far right is by the general right...

[โ€“] Krusty@feddit.it 4 points 2 months ago

Agreed. I'm using Qobuz as of now and I can't say I miss spotify

[โ€“] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

https://exportify.net/

[โ€“] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 2 points 2 months ago

They get more money from advertisements if you use the free version. Is an adblocker able to remove the ads from Spotify's audio fred?

(And if it does, does it block Spotify from getting paid for the ad anyway?)

Using the unpaid version doesn't really deny Spotify much any income. Better just move completely away to better platforms.

[โ€“] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Don't forget to use alternatives. There are many out there !

  • Bandcamp
  • Quobuz
  • Soundcloud
  • Deezer
  • YouTube Music

And you can find more here : https://alternativeto.net/category/audio-and-music/music-streaming/

[โ€“] parzival@lemmy.org 2 points 2 months ago

I personally use tidal, and as I'm a student, it's only 6 bucks a month

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ