this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
185 points (99.5% liked)

People Mastodon

197 readers
933 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Men's relationship to women doesn't affect their social status.

Ha! Try being a man in his 30s who's never been in a relationship. The social status hits rock bottom.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, that's why very few modern women go by anything other than Ms. I'm actually quite old fashioned preferring Mrs. and I only do to honor the long fight for my right to marry.

[–] LeopoldBloom@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

It may be archaic, but a young boy can be addressed as Master. When we were annual members of the San Diego Zoo, my son got mail from them addressed to Master [his name]. Also, Miss is definitely archaic. I haven't heard a grown woman referred to as Miss [her name] since the 1970s.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago

I always viewed this more like: Men only get one title because nobody gives a fuck about men. Single, married, whatever. It's irrelevant. "Here, have a nice, generic title that means literally nothing other than you are male. Now get back to work so you can create some value for ~~your rich land owner~~ society!"

Unmarried women, however, have inherent (societal) value beyond their ability to work. That's why they get extra titles. It's the same reason why most societies don't use women in war.

Once you have that Mrs in front of your name, you're considered to have "succeeded." According to the old traditions, anyway. A married woman was viewed as having been put to work (by society). That was her primary job, and people cared a lot about it!

Of course, women were still expected to also do actual work but the sexist nature of these traditions meant that it didn't count for much. Mostly because "muscle" (ability to perform manual labor for a full 12-or-more hour work day) was what ran the economy. Serfs in the fields!

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It used to be more important, now it is just done out of tradition

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

And barely, at that. These days you are lucky if people even know the difference between miss, Mrs, and Ms. Hell even the post image has it wrong. None of them have anything to do with being widowed, I assume they mean Ms (pronounced Mizz) but that’s just the most neutral option because Ms implies nothing is known about the age or marital status.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ms is for anyone, not just widows.

But Mx is better than any gendered title anyway

[–] gens@programming.dev 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Razer MX middle aged wo/man

I find *x so stupid

[–] cypherix93@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

What are you talking about? Everyone is already using *nix every day, they just don't realize it!

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why do we even need titles? It's such an outdated hierarchical notion.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have found it's getting easier and easier to not enter a title. Probably 80% of online forms I fill in these days have title as an optional field.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I've just filled one that has a non-optional. I've filled Mx just cause I hate it, regardless of my preferred pronouns.

[–] dumbass@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sir, this is a Wendy's!

Then we couldn't make that shitty joke.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In this case I believe the "sir" part of actually just a polite interjection to get attention. While I an unsure of another polite one, options include:

  • Hey
  • Oi
  • Bitch
  • Asshole
  • Mate
  • 1/2 cup sugar
  • Stir well
  • Bake 350 for 25 minutes
  • Cut and serve
[–] myster0n@feddit.nl 14 points 1 day ago

I substituted the asshole with strawberries, but somehow it's much too sweet. 1/5 stars

[–] dumbass@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

You forgot cunt.

[–] Gerblat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Ms. (pronounced miz) is supposed to be used when you don’t know if someone is single or married.

But I agree, the whole thing is outdated and icky and shouldn’t be a thing anymore

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mister is literally in my name. I prefer it.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Japanese nails it with their -san and -senpai and -sama. The only part they care about is whether someone is your senior or not, no matter their married status

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

That's not good either. Age based discrimination and subservience to elders needs to die off too.

Even the polite honorifics are garbage, "You can't say that, you must speak posh to your boss"

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see it that way at all though i guess it comes from my Vietnamese background where everyone gets an honorific, especially family. It makes it easier to know exactly who you're talking about if they have the same name.

Also, in Japanese, -chan and use of first name instead of last name gives very clear information that you've gone from acquaintance to friend.

Personally, i like 'em. Feels different being called Mrs.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 12 hours ago

Filial piety is authoritarian, hierarchical, and abusive.