this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
187 points (99.5% liked)

People Mastodon

197 readers
932 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Filial piety is authoritarian, hierarchical, and abusive.

[โ€“] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

How is any of what I said filial piety though? I get that unquestioned authority can lead to abuse, having experienced it myself and I don't practice it at all, but the naming conventions for the Vietnamese and Japanese languages don't relate to that.

If anything, it's a form of social structure - if you're an acquaintance, you're referred to in a certain way that is widely considered polite and friendly, if you're being aggressive to someone you are referred to in another way.

I don't know. I just like things orderly and easy to understand. Taking all of the above away just makes social interactions much more tedious.

Edit: just reading back on the chain of communication, I'd like to clarify that I agree with the age based discrimination should be changed but wholeheartedly disagree with removing the polite honorifics. Nothing wrong with being nice, unless the person deserves otherwise.