this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
860 points (99.0% liked)

News

33738 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 13-year-old girl at a Louisiana middle school got into a fight with classmates who were sharing AI-generated nude images of her

The girls begged for help, first from a school guidance counselor and then from a sheriff’s deputy assigned to their school. But the images were shared on Snapchat, an app that deletes messages seconds after they’re viewed, and the adults couldn’t find them. The principal had doubts they even existed.

Among the kids, the pictures were still spreading. When the 13-year-old girl stepped onto the Lafourche Parish school bus at the end of the day, a classmate was showing one of them to a friend.

“That’s when I got angry,” the eighth grader recalled at her discipline hearing.

Fed up, she attacked a boy on the bus, inviting others to join her. She was kicked out of Sixth Ward Middle School for more than 10 weeks and sent to an alternative school. She said the boy whom she and her friends suspected of creating the images wasn’t sent to that alternative school with her. The 13-year-old girl’s attorneys allege he avoided school discipline altogether.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

In 2011, when I was fourteen, I was outed as trans by someone that I thought was my best friend. As a result, three of my classmates raped me with an object on school grounds before classes began one morning. I reported it to the principal. Her response was “Well, that’s what happens. What have we learned?”, basically saying that me being trans meant that I should have expected to be raped and that I’d deserved it.

(Previously, one of the rapists had taken a nude photo of me while I was changing and uploaded it to MySpace. I had also reported this to the principal, and she’d told me I was “creating problems where there are none”. MySpace took it down at least, so I guess Tom cared more about my safety than the adult whose literal job was to protect kids.)

I was very, very quickly expelled from the school after the rape. I’m not sure what the official “reason” given was, my parents didn’t tell me. They also didn’t fight it, considering what had happened. I had to be homeschooled until graduation.

I became selectively mute after this, a problem that remains to this day. The rapists never got punished for what they did to me. The local PD (in Texas) never followed up on the report my parents made.

Sad that nothing’s changed about how schools handle sexual abuse in the almost-fifteen-years that have passed since then.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

I have no words other than to say I am deeply sorry that this happened to you. What a truly atrocious story. I sincerely hope you can heal from this trauma.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

For years [decades even] I've sought (inadequately) to avoid cameras, aware (in part from my art and special effects aptitude and education) this sort of thing and more, were coming. And now it's here. And maybe now more mice will realise, in the trap, that it's a trap. :/ Wasn't an easy thing to try to warn people about, when so many were incapable of conceiving of the threat. Let alone to get sufficient awareness in sufficient people to affect good change to avert such. Though, mostly I'd only considered the threat from government & corporations. Here now it's in the hands of almost anyone. And far faster and easier. What "fun". :-|

[–] CoffeeTails@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't really think about it until Nano Banana Pro became a thing, before I knew it was possible but it would be so obvious AI. But now? It's not obvious now. I even consider creating a digital avatar that I use instead of my own face.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yup:

I even consider creating a digital avatar that I use instead of my own face.

The notion has popped into my thoughts many times.

Like a no-skill puppet to hide behind to preserve privacy while still putting stuff out there.

[–] CoffeeTails@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes exactly!

It somehow feels more doable now since avatars on other sites are becoming more common, I mostly think of Facebook/Meta and Snapchat. But also generated images that have been trending, "me as action-figure", "me in ghibli style" etc. and even filters that people use consistently.

I think people are getting more used to seeing different types of avatars.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

The headline is misleading. She was expelled because she was so frustrated by the incompetence of the administration and the police that she took matters into her own hands and attacked someone. I think it's justified, but the headline is misleading.

The same story could be told with "school and police fail woman being attacked" but since that happens every day, it's not as punchy.

I am sure some people will interpret this as me trying to justify her being expelled or something but those people can fuck right off.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shit like this is so common that the instant I read the headline I thought, ok, so what really happened?

The infuriating thing is that by its own metric it worked; I got successfully baited into reading the article. Fuck these shitty news editors to infinity.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

True. Although I don't actually regret that it worked. The disappointing part is someone else here came up with an actually good but honest headline that can still get people to read but isn't quite as close to a lie.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

I don’t actually regret that it worked.

Are you sure though? What actual good did it do in the end; did it result in you doing anything of value or changing your mind on some topic? Or did it just make you a bit angry for a while before going about the rest of your day? (I'm not having a go at you by the way, it's the bait I'm irritated at)

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

The headline could have punched so much harder with the truth because it is divisive and justifies multiple ideologies.

"Preteen expelled for physical retaliation after school fails to protect her from AI deep fake nudes."

  • Justifies zero tolerance believers
  • Justifies feminists who think she should be a protected class
  • Justifies home school proponents
  • Justifies public School reform proponents
  • Justifies anti-AI crowd
  • Appeals to people for whom children ought to be protected

Give more truth in the headline and leave the opinions and slant for the editorial section.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Please apply for editor jobs, so you can write the headlines instead.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Maybe if that were a job you could make a living off of. I think I'll just keep my job though haha.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ooh you could have made it big in the pre-buzzfeed news era.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This problem won't stop until law enforcement starts treating deepfakes of minors as possession of child pornography with all the legal ramifications that come with it. Young boys need to understand that their actions have consequences.

In the meantime, no one under 18 should be on social media. I wish AI, deepfakes or in general, could just be illegal, but laws aren't catching up and people are being victimized.

[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago

100% AI image generation should be banned

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the images were shared on Snapchat, an app that deletes messages seconds after they’re viewed, and the adults couldn’t find them

If the Sheriff couldn't get the images, it's because he didn't bother to. It's a well known fact that Snapchat retains copies of all messages

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know everyone's justifiably outraged over this, but this just makes my heart hurt.

Imagine being a 13-yr-old girl being terrorized by CP of yourself being spread around the entire school and the adults that are meant to protect you from such repulsive crimes just shrugging their shoulders.

It's horrifying.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 22 hours ago

HARD life lesson, that the "authorities" (illegitimate hierarchies) are not there to serve and protect us. ... And that they'll even attack us if we attempt to protect ourselves.

Face the horror.

We have much to mend.

Can't mend what we don't face.

Face the horror.

We can still mend this.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

Now imagine how often rapes get unreported for the exact same image, this is what being a woman in this world is like.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Shoulda let ol Doc Millsap get aholda dem boys

load more comments
view more: next ›