this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
396 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27122 readers
2871 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 113 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

An example of a redaction: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf

119 pages of just black boxes. Fucking horseshit.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 72 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At first, I thought you meant so many black boxes on a page, that there was little information. Each entire page is a black box. There's no information at all. It's like they're mocking Congress and daring them to do something.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And they will do......exactly nothing! The fuck is the point in having laws? The fuck is the point in having a system of governance? How long until Emperor Trump dissolves congress?

Now laws? Looks like the purge is on boys

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That is fucking ridiculous. This is NOT national security shit it is a pedophile ring of rich people who used airplanes and islands to molest children without getting caught.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It kind of is national security shit, if the people whose mentions were redacted have any bearing on national security. Keeping them redacted means they are vulnerable to extortion.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't extort someone if the knowledge is public. You are aware of this right?

[–] tea@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if you misread their comment, but that's what they were saying. Keeping the names secret makes it (continue to be) a national security risk.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's the point, friend.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is NOT national security shit

That definitely affects the security of the Republicans' hold on power.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The only thing to remember is that they only blacked out sections where trump's name was mentioned. That's pretty damning.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Look, it's pretty damning but let's not just make stuff up. We don't need to. We can't know what was blacked out because... its blacked out. Surely Trump is in some of it, and notably isn't in the rest. We don't know who else is being protected though. I'm sure there are plenty of others.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago

The only way to get this admin to uncover others is to make trump try to keep saving that terrible face of his. Until the admin opens up the files, anything redacted is the most heinous acts performed by and on trump.

[–] TheseusNow@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

They recently removed a photo of Epstein's open Desk with Trump's photo in a drawer. So its not as made up as it sounds. The removed photo still made it to many news sites. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2025/dec/19/new-photos-from-epstein-files-release

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I asked ___ if she knew what being circumcised meant and she stated no. ____ then said that she thought Epstein was in steroids because he was a "really built guy and his wee wee was very tiny." Gonzalez would explain that when she stated "wee wee" she meant penis.

I shouldn't laugh...the situation is terrible...but damn, that's gold.

Not from your doc. From volume 4, doc 7157, page 15.

Edit to add: some of this is just straight up teasing. I just opened a few that were just scanned pictures of microcasette tapes. Wtf am I supposed to do with that? Can I print it out and play it on a fax machine?

[–] BarbedDentalFloss@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Has anyone tried datamining around the black boxes? Because this DoJ is so unbelievably incompetent I wouldn't be surprised if you could just delete a black layer to find the fun stuff underneath.

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago

They copied and pasted the same black box. Each page is literally the same nothing burger, you can open it in a text editor and see the repeating chunks. The interesting part is that page is identical across files. They didn't even bother redacting individual parts, just replaced the whole thing.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think people took a look and just saw empty pages. Would not be surprised to find out something later though.

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish so badly it was one of those times they just changed the font background color thinking that would do the trick and we could all really see what they were hiding

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's happened before. We can hope it happens here.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They are bundling all of the trump documents into these single file pdfs and just completely blacking out the whole page. There's just too much shit to figure out what's incriminating and redact line by line.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

"Access Denied"

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I boggles my mind that so many in people in government are okay with children being raped.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

They deserve to be overthrown

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly what did y'all expect?

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly this

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey! Exactly what we expect!

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I've been saying this every time someone says "release the files!".

As if they'd release documents showing that Trump managed Epstein's warehouse stock.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone knew this was going to be the outcome. It doesn't mean that forcing them to do this was worthless though. First, it makes it very obvious to everyone that they're hiding something. Second, this is illegal, as congress specifically forbade redactions for the reasons they gave. This probably won't do anything, but it's still good to make them break laws in case it can be used later against them. Third, it wastes their time. The people who had to go through and redact all this stuff weren't doing other things.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only 11 more months before the midterms. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if congress does not punch back, this will be fodder for a house oversight committee to look into the failure to release the files in the way intended by the law.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

There is always the chance they incompetently bungled something, like all the previous times. We'll know once they've all been parsed. Though this is the most important one, so we'll see.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A joke is supposed to be funny. They can be insulting, or plain mean and horrible but still funny. This isn't funny. This was predictable and nauseating.

What is funny -mainly because I'm not american- is that unless fundamental changes happen then this is the precedent that's set for future your presidents. When the orange kiddie fiddler dies it may get a bit better initially but at some point in the future a more competently evil cunt will reign your kingdom and you'll look back to king Donvict Drumpf and think "shit, we should have done something".

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can already hear the arguments. "We survived Donald Trump. That just proves our democracy is strong. Let's just move on." Like someone arguing that the first heart attack didn't kill them so everything is status quo.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's what I heard from folks who supported Trump 1.0. "It'll be a stress test of the government, the guard rails." Well, it was. And democracy completely failed the "test." Cool.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

and think "shit, we should have done something"

They already do, regarding watergate. America is like the main character of Momento.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago

This is a multi-thousand-page fuck you. It's also overwhelming circumstantial evidence that the files contain evidence that Trump was deeply involved in the trafficking and child rape.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

NOT GOOD ENOUGH! I DEMAND CONSEQUENCES!

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Let's do another release with everything redacted except for the names (aside from victims, obviously).

Give us some random adjectives and maybe a noun here and there, too. We'll figure out the rest.

....Peter Thiel.........Bill Clinton......door knob.....large, black......Bill Cosby....... orangutan.......Musk.....umbrellas.......Jared from Subway....foot-long............ boofing........Brock Allen Turner...........Harambe.