this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
56 points (95.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35676 readers
1550 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google isn't what it used to be, but the free alternatives like DuckDuckGo aren't really that great. Given how vital a good search engine has been to make any use of the internet since the late 90s, I think it's not unreasonable to offer quality search at a reasonable price.

I'm not aware of any paid-for search engines, and I'm not sure what they could charge for without seeming greedy. Perhaps have a free tier that limits you to so many searches per day and a paid tier with unlimited searches and another with API access or something. The key would be to have a good-better-best system that makes everyone feel they're getting a reasonable product for what they're paying while keeping the experience serviceable for free riders.

Email is similar. While it's not too hard to set up a bare SMTP server, a bare SMTP server will get you absolutely nowhere because every reputable email service will flag it as spam. The hard part is making the server pass all the sniff tests that other services use. You also cannot self-host because residential ISPs block port 25, again as a spam prevention mechanism.

I pay for Proton, not because I trust them per se, indeed the more a company trumpets about how secure and anonymous they are the more suspicious I get. But I trust them more than I trust Google and that's what matters.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zlatiah@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

For search engine: I'm self hosting SearXNG so I'm already indirectly paying via domain registry/VPS? So yes. Technically this can be done for free though (local docker, random RasPi laying around, ...)

For email: paid (mailbox.org), worth it. Selfhosting email was too much of a headache at least for me

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Not doing it for search engines currently, but I am absolutely doing it for a VPN ( Proton ) for the bonus of having better drive and email attached.

I will agree with you on trusting Proton more than google and how suspicious Proton can seem.

Yep. I switched to Kagi a bit over a year ago, which is paid search. And I pay for my email through Migadu; I thought about hosting it myself but honestly it seemed like more potential hassle than I wanted to deal with.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago

Kagi and Tuta. OP is drunk.

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

If I had the money, then sure. I am currently barely keeping my apartment and pantry stocked tho, so I would not take this option unless it was dirt cheap

[–] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Email yes but only with my own domain so I can change providers if the price changes.

I wouldn't pay for anything I'd prefer to keep anonymous and that includes search.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

How is your email not flagged as spam? Last time I ran my own email/domain, I could hardly deliver anything. Been 10-years though and I've learned more about best practices. Can it be done now?

[–] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

I haven't done it myself but know people who do. If you use a known provider and only the domain is yours I wouldn't expect it to be blocked as companies also use their own domain for their email.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Running your own SMTP is still going to be tough. But you can use a mail provider that lets you use your own domain, then you can use their SMTP which should not get flagged as easily.

[–] chazwhiz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I pay for Kagi Search, it’s awesome. It’s got a ton of useful features you’d never see in advertising-based search engines, like the ability to up and down rank sites.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. I pay for Proton for mail and Kagi for search.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as it's fairly priced with proper privacy, definitely.

kagi.com is a paid search engine like you describe.

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

I use kagi. Better search results than Google. No bullshit. Love it.

[–] leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 22 hours ago

For email, yes. For search, not until the subscription engines like Kagi go open source (maybe Kagi are and I just missed it but I can't see a link to a repo on their website).

I have no objections to paying for a service but I am long past just trusting software. As for kagi in particular, $10 (plus tax) per month for unlimited search is a ridiculous price.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

Free proton for email, paid Kagi for search.

[–] python@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I use Purelymail for Email, just because it was the cheapest and easiest solution to use my own domain without having to host anything myself. I don't think any other Email service will beat their 10$ per year price.

For search engine, I have tried Kagi but just didn't see the point. My DDG searches are perfectly fine and I still find everything I need with relative ease. Although I've been actually needing the search engine much less recently as I've embraced just reading the official documentation for things I program with haha

[–] RalfWausE@blackneon.net 6 points 1 day ago

I pay for Posteo and Metager, i would never want to go back to Goole...

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Fastmail is so insanely good it’s crazy how bad Gmail got

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

What do you mean "if"? At this point anything works better than google. Specially those that cost money.

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

£12-ish a year on mailbox.org

I made the switch about 6 months ago and I'm very happy with them

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can you have a good search engine anymore? You can get rid of ads but now the fact SEO marketing killed internet searches.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hadn't thought of SEO as a contributing factor to the decline of the search experience, but it absolutely makes sense. To some degree I think SEO is actually GEO (Google's Engine Optimization) but if some other platform, even a paid one that isn't incentivized to weigh sponsored content higher, became dominant SEO would just pivot to minmaxing for that platform instead.

Incidentally, there's a search engine called wiby.org that only indexes sites that don't use Javascript, which in practice makes it a great web 1.0 search engine.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

I was in the webmaster role for a website from the early start of the internet - SEO started off as simple ways to help improve index placement by giving different methods to the web creators to aid in better categorization of content. It quickly became an arms race of how to best game the system, and the system kept changing as well because the old SEO basics like keyword and content arrangement wasn't enough. There was one search engine I participated in (I can't recall now which one) that did the pay for clicks, and you'd literally have to pump money in the online app to try and stay above your keyword competitors, all in real time. It got stupid. And I got frustrated with it, as I felt the original goal to find the best website for a particular search had been long lost and now it was all about mechanisms to profit from everyone trying to make that first page hit. The "best" sites that couldn't play this game were lost.

Google became the dominant player by buying up other databases and engines, but even with this gaming they used to be able to produce results if you knew how to phrase searches beyond just a few words. It's almost like the whole AI prompting, what you put in makes a difference. But they eventually changed things and started getting worse results, lots of duplication, and then added AI which ruined anything they still had of quality.

I miss Hotbot. That was my go-to long ago, and it was so good. It became part of Google eventually.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 23 hours ago

No. There's no guarantee they won't get greedy and start selling my data anyway. They'd have to have a really good pitch and some way to back it up that would get me to pay. I yet know what it is, but I haven't seen it yet.

[–] SethranKada@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I pay for proton mail, but selfhost my own meta-search engine. Its not as pure as as one that crawls the web on its own, but the ones that do aren't developed enough for everyday use in my opinion.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

I pay for email. Proton Unlimited atm which includes email, cloud, vpn, password and email aliases. They offer more but that's all I use. Their Linux support is crap so I may move to other services.

For search, I using Startpage. Seems to give me the results I want. Once in a while I change to Brave, Qwant, or DDG.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I selfhost mail and pay for search, though I use the API of the paid service in my searxng.

[–] JASN_DE@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I pay for email (Posteo) and selfhost SearXNG, so more or less yes.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

My dream IEP would provide secure search, email, calendar, office suite and cloud services. I would pay just one provider for all services combined. I would gladly double my monthly subscription for such a service, with 2 accounts at 50go each

[–] karashta@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I pay for posteo for email and use Qwant for searches.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I pay for proton to get both email and VPN. Search really doesn't matter that much to me anymore. I've learned to just live with the annoying aspects of duck duck go, and I use it infrequently enough that i don't think I'd ever be willing to pay for it.

[–] flamiera@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No I wouldn't.

E-Mail is an essential tool and so is using a search engine. When ProtonMail was offering a subscription just so I can have multiple folders, that turned me off.

I hate that what is deemed essential, is turned into a monetizing scheme. God forbid those of us lived in a time where search engines were useful and e-mail was perfected. Now we're in the era of monetizing everything so those two features have been enshittified.

[–] circledot@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it's free, you are the product. How do you expect someone to offer you services for free?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Linux is free, for a trivial counter example.

[–] circledot@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago

Linux isn't a service though. And it's getting funding.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

a time where search engines were useful and e-mail was perfected

And YouTube was friendlier! Google was losing money on all that in order to corner the market. Now they want paid back. Kinda like reddit losing money every quarter for 19-years. They just turned a profit for the first time.

We got a lot of free shit, got used it, and are now bitching about paying, or watching ads. Ultimately, enshittification was always in the cards. Not sure how we get around that without paying for microservices, kinda like OP is asking about.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The fuck do you get for paid email? It’s literally just SMTP/POP — where’s the “value add”? I use my own email client so the bullshit ads from Google aren’t an issue, but am I missing out on some email 2.0 magic??

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It’s literally just SMTP/POP — where’s the “value add”?

I'd say to the majority of people, that first part reads like nonsense.

The value add is thus "you don't have to learn computer stuff."

[–] natecox@programming.dev 3 points 17 hours ago

The person you’re responding to has clearly never been in charge of hosting a mail server. That shit is absolutely not worth it.

Free email sounds good until you realize you’re paying for it by letting them peruse your mail to scrape out ad data and feed their LLMs.

I’m pretty happy to pay a small fee to avoid both of the above.

[–] bitofarambler@crazypeople.online 1 points 11 hours ago

I paid for an email service to step back from google and the services were so disappointing after a couple years and never improved that i couldn't justify the admittedly low cost and went back to freemails.