this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
686 points (98.6% liked)

News

33281 readers
1863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/58347995

BOYCOTT NIKE!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Wow.

What an utter piece of human garbage who's doing what he can at the end of his privileged life to harm others.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

In a shocking turn of events, a business executive is scum.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

Got it. Brand is dead to me.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 36 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He sells a running shoe. A shoe folks. Now he thinks he has the ability to shape the worlds future because of all the money he made exploiting the producers of the shoes and gouging the customers of the shoe. What a fucking stretch. What is with these "too much money" guys?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

They have severe OCD Hoarding Disorder, and they have a serious compulsion to hoard money, even when they have far more than they or their descendents can ever spend.

If this was someone hoarding anything else at that level, cats, rusty cars, newspapers, junk, etc., the government would step in, remove their treasure, and get that person the mental help they require. We should do the same with Financial Hoarders - detain them and get them the mental health care they require, and remove their hoard that is making life difficult for their neighbors. If they were hoarding cats, we'd put them up for adoption, so their financial hoard should be redistributed to the citizens.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Psssttt....Nike replicas are so good now that they sometimes use medical scanning devices to try to tell them apart. They look identical down to the correct boxes, security tags, etc...

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

Imagine what these replica brands could achieve if they made their own stuff and people weren't married to the brands

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The people i know who wear nike, only wear nike. It's like a weird cult. I met two women this year who said they would NEVER wear anything else.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The weird, cultlike pseudo-romantic obsession people develop with brands is, frankly, deserving of medication for their mental derrangement.

Nike isnt even that good!

The last time I owned a pair of Nikes, they literally fell apart and were ruined by getting caught one time in the rain.

[–] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A cult...for Nike? Sounds classical

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 5 points 10 hours ago

That joke is hella nice

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 17 hours ago

Again

Prohibit billionaires

Cap all netwoths at 10-20 million dollars per person, tops.

Companies should not be worth more than 1 billion dollars, cap it.

Anything over that has automatically 100% go to taxes

Well end up with -instead of one trillion dollar compant- tens of thousands of centillion dollar worth companies, you know, those that aren't too big to fail and that won't need bailouts

Well end up with a government that gets so much tax income that it can afford free education, free healthcare, hell, UBI even.

Noone will be super rich and or powerful ever again, no one will be able to usurp all resources for themselves.

Humanity spent 2000 years on perfecting the "0.1% must get as Uber rich as possible" and we got it down to an art to concentrate as much wealth as possible with as little people as possible. It is NOT normal, it is NOT acceptable, ajf it has to stop NOW! It's destroying our world, literally, as these assholes are the main drivers behind climate change.

Here I am making sure to use as little water as possible and all of my life long work gets thrown into he garbage because miss multimillionaire needs to do grocery shopping with her fucking private jet.

While on this bandwagon, ban all private jets, even for politicians. Maybe maybe we can keep a few as a sort of air ambulance or something z that should be fine, but all the rest, BAN IT. Same for theega yachts, outright world wide ban.

It is bizarre to me that most people just act as if all this is perfectly fine and acceptable. There is no right, no reason why anyone should have a higher net worth than (say) 10 million, so why do we allow this to happen in the first place?

Haven't we learned anything?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Meh. This is Oregon. That kind of money may get 1 or 2 more republicans in the legislature. Probably moderate republicans even. But it isn't going to change much for the state. I don’t happen to buy anything Nike anyway. But overall, we got bigger fish to fry right now.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly why we shouldn't have billionaires. It's literally impossible to spend a billion dollars on things for yourself, so what's left but to spend it on manipulating other people.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They could spend it on bettering the world, but that would never occur to them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 12 hours ago

"I don't want to live in a world where my company isn't the one company making the world better"

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago

What a piece of shit

Of course a sweat-shop owner is a republican.

[–] ImperialATAT@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

Fuck him. I have not and never will support his brand.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

After the recent election? You can kiss that fucking money goodbye. Have fun losing big.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I resolved never to buy or wear Nike back in the late 90s. The companies practices are abominable but I also hated the culture of conspicuous consumption and the way people believed it gave them license to shit on others for not turning themselves into a walking ad. I grew up poor, so I know the feeling of being made to feel less-than because I got Pro Wings on instead of Jordans.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Boycot all rich assholes who think they have a right to interfere in our democracy! Fuck these rich Nazis. Also nikes are shit. Overpriced garbage and they smell terrible if they get wet.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 160 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Nikes are bar none the worst shoes people try to have me repair. They are made from shitty criminally overpriced plastic and foam that decomposes and falls apart in the box let alone after someone wears them

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (14 children)

What shoes do you recommend? Looking to get a new pair soon.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

From my point of view athletic shoes aren't really a thing that can be effectively repaired because even the nice ones use plastics that aren't easy to work with after they've been worn. I can usually do something but its sentiment that keeps them going not quality. But really the lesson I try to teach people is to not give a fuck about the name on the shoe. It vastly more important to know how a shoe is supposed to fit on your foot and that it feels comfortable long term.

Edit: I will add a few names to avoid pretty much entirely though. Post-1988 Cole Haan (owned by Nike), Louis Vuitton and Ecco

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 20 hours ago

nike is short for nikael.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I wore Nike running shoes one season. They broke my leg (stress fracture) before I hit 200 miles. Never had that problem with any other shoe.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why are old republicans so fucking weird looking.

While Knight is generally reluctant to give interviews, he spoke with the New York Times in October 2022 regarding his support for Republican candidates. He argued Oregon's government had drifted too far to the left and described himself as "more conservative than Nike," responding to criticism of him backing an anti-abortion candidate which apparently contrasted with the company's image of supporting progressive social justice causes.[109] Nike itself donated $75,000 to Drazan and Johnson's Democratic opponent, Tina Kotek, the eventual winner of the election. - WIKIPEDIA

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago

Not just the old ones, many of them in the administration look super strange with even weirder views.

One looks like they fought a lawnmower at a barbershop and lost, another looks like a fanfic witch from The Matrix, several of them look like cast members from The Witch (movie), others have...odd features that make them look like WW2 villains or slightly methed out. And all of them are batshit insane.

You can't even find people like that in a big city.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Wow fuck that guy

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 day ago

Oh look, yet another example of why we should tax wealth and not work.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Republican are the ones that burned Nikes for sponsoring Colin Kaepernick....

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

I can't boycott no harder, we haven't purchased a name brand in weeks!

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because otherwise there would be a small risk that money would go to taxes instead and help people who need it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›