this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
683 points (100.0% liked)

90s Memes

481 readers
9 users here now

The Memiverse:
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!philosophymemes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 123 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ButtDrugs@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

I came to the comments hoping someone posted this. Its a classic and many young'ins will never know the pain.

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

As a teenager in this era this sort of thing was awful especially when downloading certain ahhhhh videos…

There was a program I found that really helped called NetAnt.

You see back then you could download a small file quickly, but for larger files the distant server would throttle your connection so you wouldn’t hog all their bandwidth. Enter NetAnt.

NetAnt would send several different ‘ants’ to the server and request different parts of the same file. Then it would download it in chunks and create a file when it was done. You could also queue up different urls to pull from, you just had to know the file structure of the websites content and back then that was rarely obscured and was often logical and predictable. This ended being one of my first applications of my C++ classes to solve a problem I had. I made a little program that generated strings of urls based on what I thought the file structure was and then I dumped a thousand file requests into NetAnt to download while I was in school.

It worked! And I ended up with gigs and gigs of full porn videos from one of the nastiest websites back then by scraping downloads from the sample pages of 30 second clips.

I don’t think I actually watched much of it, the acquisition was the important part.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

There was a bunch of download managers like that! I personally used GoZilla, and as many other apps, it would download in multiple pieces, and there were retries (so you wouldn't lose the progress if you disconnected for a second, or something like that).
But I did download a pirated version of Ultima Online, to play on a pirate server, through standard Internet Explorer dialog. The file was 314MB, it took a couple days while I was feeding my Internet Provider with time codes and asking my mom not to even think of touching the phone.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had GetRight to do that. The great thing about it was that it could also work with multiple mirrors. So you would download the same file from multiple servers at once.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

GetRight was the bomb.

Then I got fast internet (we're talking 25 MBit DSL here) and servers stopped being so stingy and download managers slowly became a thing of the past.

And then, a year or so ago, I had to work on a company VM that would randomly reset the connection to GitHub, from which I needed a rather large file. So I wrote a super cheap download manager and named it GetWrong in honor of the hero of my ISDN days.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's people like you who send all their web queries chunked as millions of different DNS queries to be assembled later, just so they don't have to sign up for the free airport wifi.

EDIT: YOU TOOK DOWN CLOUDFLARE, DIDN'T YOU!?

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Yes, I wanted to download the demo for Alpha Centauri

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Called a download manager, lots of different options.

[–] Tramdan@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When you came back in the room it wouldn't be saying 3 minutes or 52 years. It would be saying 'are you sure you want to move file xxxxx.xxx' and it would have been saying that since you left the room.

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't that how Windows still works?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Windows admin here, YES it fucking is, this is why we robocopy.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

"I'll be there in a Microsoft minute."

I have no idea when I'll be there and there's a good chance I'll take a nap.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Try downloading peer hosted torrents. If there’s only one person hosting and they stop, your estimated time will creep to 40+ years before it shows it as not downloading.

Edit: pic for proof

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had some media that I really wanted but couldn't find anywhere (the Latin American Spanish dub of a movie). I could find unseeded torrents though.

I put the most promising one in my server and waited. Nothing for a month or so, then one day I check in and see it's at 5%. And it would sporadically continue for 3 more months until it completed.

As far as I could tell basically just some random person who happened to have this file was a both a casual torrenter and a leech. But unlike most leeches they didn't bother stopping the seeding of completed files, they just shut down the program altogether when they weren't downloading.

So they (with either throttled upload in their client or shitty upload speeds in general) would go on, open their torrent program, download something, and in doing so keep their program up long enough to seed a few MB before their download completed and they turned it off.

That file went on to be my highest seed ratio by far after lol

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Similar situation for me with the 1978 Robin Hood film.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And then your brother picked up the phone to call his girlfriend...

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No, no, he was in his room painting his airfix. It was my sister who did the picking up the phone to call her boyfriend and her other friends. We argued A LOT about this.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The person writing this post also doesn't sell it.

This wasn't just for a download. This was for moving files generally.

See how it's an FTP transfer? As far as the system cares, it's like moving a file from one folder to another. And moving large files was huge back when you had a maximum drive size of 60 gigs in the OS, so you had to partition your large harddrives into like a dozen partitions and had to regularly move huge chunks of data to manage storage.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Download? This happened even while copying files or installing games/software off a CD.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I love that they're using IE to download Netscape. Some things never change…

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good ol' days when I used to leave the computer on downloading 1 GB of software overnight, and I would pray to the gods in the morning that it hadn't aborted halfway through.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Download managers, when they worked anyway.

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is still relatable today, since most rural areas only offer DSL, Comcast, or 1 bar of 4G (if you're not using starlink let alone those other satellite ISPs that shall not be named!) AND they decide to throttle you, all that changes is the download dialogue's title bar being windows 11 themed 😉

That reminds me of the time I filed a complaint with the FCC a few years over Centurylink's "fancy" dialup (DSL, we had a 10 Mbps plan but frequented approximately 1 byte/s) and CENTURYLINK sent me a letter with my complaint in it!

Sounds like illegal muni/co-op networks are the way to go.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Showing off with their 56.6kbps modem.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I was so chuffed when I got my 56.6. Do much faster than my dad's. Downloads went like the clappers. I was usually able to download a three minute video clip in well under 20 minutes!

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

13.3k clan here to represent.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Fun fact: Even if the estimation were correct, you wouldn't have had to wait 34yrs anyways since it didn't took that long to get better network speed

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Legends say the file is still downloading

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NTFS is still soo slow compared to any file operation i do on Linux.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Linux: "I'm gonna copy this GB file instantly, and hope you don't call sync any time soon"

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Absolutely awful when it's some flash drive that just slows down to nothing at which point you'd rather cancel the tranfer, but you can't, but you also can't unmount because it's busy, so you just accept the loss, unplug and then re-format.

I only know how to add stuff to fstab with sync option, but what about other drives? I don't want to manually mount everything.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You could use a custom udev rule: https://linuxmind.dev/2025/09/02/auto-mount-usb-with-udev-rules/

Not sure if auto-mounting is what you want though.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I don’t want to manually mount everything.

Heh, I literally do -- it's become so automatic it's not even a pain point anymore

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Ahh, FlashGet, you used to be a beautiful thing. At least before they turned it into an adware shitfest. Glad I migrated off Windows before then.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Poor guy is probably still waiting for cc32e47.exe to finish downloading. Should be done in the next ten years or so.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Netscape was bloatware, even by today's standards. Though to be fair, nothing back then was standard so you might as well pack all the libraries in one big ole sloppy zip

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I bought GetRight.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What a great program!

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

So much this.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Even other adults that lived through this with me have forgotten

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Someone feeling the need to explain this feels weird

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Don’t most torrent clients do these types of estimates? (Of course you can resume a torrent though.)