this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
88 points (96.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44412 readers
920 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Example is based on US politics, but could apply to any equally corrupt government) In this day and age, it's clear that rampant corruption is abound with mega corporations buying up politicians with relative pennies they found under their couches.

When words and calls to action fail. Why are there no crowdfunded grassroots movements that actively try to play the same bribery game. If anything, to finally shine a light on how broken the system is.

If the dollar has a voice, why not let the people's dollars speak?

Of course, this is clearly a terrible idea long term for any system to work like this, plus a bit of a race to the bottom.

The question is more along the line of: Has anyone actually tried this? If so, why/why not?

Be civil please.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

Poor people don't have disposable income. Especially not the throw at a politician and hope kinda income.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 16 hours ago

There are a lot of large PAC's that effectively do this, pulling together a sizeable voting block and donation base. AARP, an organization for retired people, is one of the larger ones. It just happens that it is hard to a large group of people to agree on policy.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 45 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
  1. You can already do this. There are tons of nonprofits that lobby the government for x, y, and z.
  2. But these non-profits don't tend to engage in much explicit bribery, because the people working at these organizations and who donate to these organizations think outright bribery is wrong.
  3. Finally, if you started a gofundme to bribe a politician, they would 1,000,000% not take your money. When you bribe someone, discretion is part of the deal, and with a public gofundme, you've already broken that discretion.
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
  1. You'd be a total moron to donate to some random person who claims they'll use the money to bribe politicians
[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, there goes my retirement scheme!

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Just market it to Trump supporters. Say your raising money for the wall. Use the first round to buy some land near the border. Next round use it for the construction of your new house and rug pull the website. The only thing more unethical is for that money to fund a MAGA true believer.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago
[–] Steve@communick.news 48 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Even large groups of people can't put together enough money.
It also costs a lot of money to organise that kind of thing.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 45 points 22 hours ago

If you look at wealth distribution, it becomes very obvious that the top can always pay more.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 17 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

OP has a point. You might be surprised how little money it takes to influence legislation. ABSCAM showed just how cheaply political favors can be purchased.

From there, our investigation led to southern New Jersey and on to Washington, D.C. Our criminal contacts led us to politicians in Camden who were willing to offer bribes to get our "business" a gambling license in Atlantic City. Then, when we expressed interest in their suggestion to get the sheik asylum in the U.S., these corrupt politicians arranged for us to meet some U.S. Congressmen who could make it happen with private legislation. For a price, of course: $50,000 up front and an extra $50,000 later.

When the dust settled, one senator, six congressman, and more than a dozen other criminals and corrupt officials were arrested and found guilty.

Admittedly, this was $100,000 in 1980 dollars, but even today, lobbyists don't give millions to politicians to get things passed.

Occupy Wall Street rounded up $400,000 to wipe out $15 million in medical debt not that long ago. I would think that a concerted effort by progressive organizations could collect millions to lobby politicians to write and pass progressive laws. I've often wondered why this doesn't happen.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

One potential organisation type to do this would be a labor union. If multiple unions pool their resources they could make a super PAC and lobby hard.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

To my knowledge the problem isn't getting together the funds for any single "contribution", it's having the funds to pay the politician off over and over again. Sure, half a million dollars sounds like a lot more than a hundred thousand, but how many times can that half million be successfully crowdfunded? It's much more reliable for the politicians to just accept the smaller but more consistent "contributions" from the more wealthy parties.

On top of that, outright bribery is illegal, attempting something like that is liable to get you arrested.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 16 hours ago

When SOPA was a thing the politicians were bought for under $20k

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 21 hours ago

We're not just looking at individual "donations" to single politicians. But hundreds of them, to all the politicians. And even more to create a massive "People's PAC" that gets continuous reliable funding for donations, adds, fake studies and all the other crap we have to fight.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

you'd be surprised how cheap a politician can be

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 21 points 22 hours ago

There were bribe stats I read at some point. It's often four figures. Pathetic, but yeah we could match that.

The problem is rich people will just start bribing them even more. It's like bidding at an auction.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 22 hours ago

They go to the highest bidder.
And the wealthy have enough now to outbid whatever we come up with.

[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In a way that is what trade unions do. Here in the UK they donate to the Labour party, for some reason.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago

Am in one in england. They're fucking morons, that's why. At least the northern England branch. representative of thea

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

This is basically what various nonprofit orgs that people can join amount to.

Like, if you join the NRA your subscription cost is going to lobbying politicians on gun issues, among other stuff like keeping the org running and paying for nice things for the head of the org.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

In civilised countries that would be illegal. In the USA - I don't know.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 14 points 22 hours ago

To really have influence we'd have to crowdfund an island where we can film politicians molesting children.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

In a corrupt developing country, anyone can bribe officials for things, especially if its small and within that officials purview, in a dysfunctional semi-corrupt developed capitalist democracy, only the rich 1% can.

Example: One Child Policy was officially policy in China, but you pay their "fines"/bribes/extortion (or whatever you wanna call it) and voila, problems go away. Ask how I know... I am the second son in my family lol, and no, we aren't a rich family, it was like from savings over a period time or something, or maybe my parents borrowed from relatives, idk the details... like... people just bribe for a lot of small everyday stuff, I heard about even getting jobs or getting into university, and people talk so casually about it. There's a term for it "走后门" (2nd definition: to pull strings; to call in favours; to use the influence of someone in authority to achieve one's goal), usually someone you know (关系 Guanxi), and you give them money, like probably in the form of a 红包 (Red Envelope, you know, the new year thing).

In America? Nah, there's law and order... or something... you can't just bribe for stuff...

Its a "gift" lol, not bribe. Thomas Clarance has declared so. Just ask him about it while he's on vacation on the yacht of some random 1%er.

Wait, you wanna do the same? Wanna buy a supreme court justice or a congress member? Nah fam, come back when you're part of the 1%.

(TLDR: Every country sucks and is corrupt in one way or another.)

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

In America if you break a driving law you typically get “points” on your license. Too many points and you lose it. Also more points = more expensive insurance costs per month.

Or you can just pay a few hundred dollars and not get points instead

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Here’s a better use for all that money.

Start a non-profit organisation that harasses and annoys the hell out of people who take bribes. Stuff like putting laxatives in their coffee, banana peels on their path, water buckets on door, and so on. You get the idea. Also, they should video those pranks and post them online. Name and shame anyone who takes bribes.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The laxative one is almost certainly illegal

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Ah, rats. So much for that idea.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Would anyone accept the money if the purpose was so obviously to expose corruption?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

The top ~5-6 people l wealthy people own more than the bottom 51% on the planet combined. Let alone a single country.

But there is something like WolfPAC

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 22 hours ago

Would be easier to just call Luigi often enough.

Isn't this just taxes with extra steps?

[–] JASN_DE@feddit.org 5 points 22 hours ago

What do you think donations are? No need to do the extra crowdfunding step.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

In America business and government are not actually separate. This is important to understand because it’s a structural feature of the American economy. We are a true capitalist libertaria. The government is comprised of the companies and people in business

American business is America itself and the government is a co-leader whose purpose is to facilitate American business interests.

This isn’t corruption like in the movies where you pay off crooked cops (which doesn’t really happen here). This is what businesses and individuals competing for political power looks like in a true capitalist libertaria.

[–] llooll@feddit.online 3 points 21 hours ago

I always thought a “buy a lobbyist” would be a good crowd funded service. lets build it, I can offer up designs.