this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
25 points (96.3% liked)

TechTakes

2295 readers
87 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

Armin Ronacher, creator of the vastly popular Python Flask and Jinja framworks, comes out in defence of DHH, saying his racist diatribe about the ethnic make up of London was in fact not racist, and the state of Israel, that it's apparently fine that it remains an oppressive ethnostate in order to 'preserve its particular cultural identity'.

https://lobste.rs/s/necwp9/praise_dhh#c_r1jvrx (archive)

https://mastodon.social/@alatiera/115531823601853748

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Yud:

one of Earth's top scientists on sex and gender has published her latest work

It's Aella.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 2 hours ago

second take from me. Here's the full tweet:

one of Earth's top scientists on sex and gender has published her latest work, open for all to read in a widely read venue on that science topic, where it will receive far more peer scrutiny than any lesser forum provides

I'm going to read this as a joke because he didn't end it with a period, and he is secretly beefing with aella

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I expect her methodology was great but I don't actually know what it was.

Science!

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

As background: the Kaufmann report that prompted all this is a load of absolute garbage. As discussed fairly extensively on social media (example).

As for Aella's addition: oh god why did I read this?

The methodology was apparently running a "Big Kink Survey" which was "trending on TikTok" and had "very good SEO". I suppose this is the right data needed to draw conclusions about what rate 14 year olds are transgender.

The whole this is also full of weird gender essentialism (I never want to read the word "biofemales" again).

I think this is evidence for an increasing split between afabs and amabs

But don't worry she's very pro trans (JK Rowling sense):

Despite having been cancelled by the more radical subgroups of trans people, I’m nevertheless very pro trans.

Which is why she wants to make a massive reach and be concerned that maybe trans people are getting too much healthcare:

I think it’s unlikely that 11.5% of afabs are actually trans men in a way that would last through adulthood. If my data is measuring any real trend in the world, and if that trend meaningfully increases permanent changes to bodies, then this high percentage might actually be quite bad.

... Nevermind that her data doesn't even touch on stuff like rate of HRT, or regret rate; these "concerns" are all pulled out of thin air.

(I also lament that this makes things really rough for the trans men for whom this is not a fad, and for whom earlier transitioning would be a huge quality of life improvement.)

Like dear cis people are you OK? Is society not transphobic enough for you? :'(

Are you worried that if a teenager is allowed to explore their gender a little that it will cause a bunch of precocious little cis girls to accidentally glance at a vial of testosterone the wrong way and grow a fantastic beard overnight?

When I started estrogen (later than I should have and fuck you Idaho) I was absolutely 100% sure that it was the right thing to try, and that I'd stop if I didn't like it. Never looked back (estrogen is tasty and I encourage everyone to try it at least once), and I had years before there was much you could call permanent.

But of course it's not the "permanent changes to bodies" that made me a 6ft tall amazonian beauty that people like Aella are concerned about. "What if we accidentally trans one of the cis??" fundamentally assumes it is OK to accidentally withhold critical medicine from countless trans people just to be "safe".

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 1 points 17 minutes ago

Why am I getting James Somerton flashbacks

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 4 points 6 hours ago

I think she would be willing to learn how to cite things, not sure whether she wants to learn why just surveying people is not the best way to find the truth. Pretty sure that her interest in trans people is not purely scientific.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm not sure her work is any worse than the average psychology paper that ends up in a magazine rack, but I am not signing up for her Substack to see. And "no worse than the average psychology paper" is not high praise.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 7 hours ago

yeah and I’m a brain surgeon because sometimes when I pick my nose I go a little too deep

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

at://did:plc:x2obbaxjktznf67mnhznpplp/app.bsky.feed.post/3m5z5da4mvk24

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:x2obbaxjktznf67mnhznpplp/post/3m5z5da4mvk24

Windscribe's twitter account being transphobic.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

Free speech can he expensive for dipshits.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I saw this, so now you all get to: Alex Karp performs a stationary Gatotsu with a sabre, don’t ask me why.

E: reference explainer and visual descriptionThe Gatotsu is a fictional swordfighting style from the manga/anime series Rurouni Kenshin wielded by Saitou Hajime, one of the main characters. It also refers to the frequent stance and movement Hajime makes when fighting.

In the video, Alex Karp stands next to a young woman. One may surmise that he is trying to impress her with a display of sword mastery. In his right hand he is holding a broad, curved sword, maybe a sabre. His left arm is outstretched at shoulder height in front of him, pointing at an imaginary target, and the sword is pointing at the same target, held at the same height with the flat side parallel to the ground. He performs an awkward looking thrust, as if mimicking the Gatotsu as mentioned above. In the rest of the video he is playing around with the sword, sometimes performing the same thrust and otherwise tossing it limply around in his hand.

There is text at the top of video reading:

Your CEO: Powerpoint

Palantir CEO:

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 1 points 14 minutes ago

you just activated my trap card and became a person to whom I can show this video evaluating the usefulness of gatotsu in a real life context, because I have no one else to show it to

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EITUJ1HqSCQ

[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Out of all of the things he did, that is one of those things.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 15 hours ago

While you partied

I studied THE BLADE

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Databricks CEO: “we’ve already achieved AGI fam, the haters just keep moving the goalposts”

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

WTF are databricks? LLM feces?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I looked it up.

boring answer

the company is a data analytics platform. According to wikipedia they promote the model of a “data lakehouse”, a hydrid of a “data lake” and a “data warehouse”. I don’t know what any of this means

Sneer answer: 100% LLM feces. Databricks puts the anal in analytics

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK data warehouse = regular database data lake = place to keep various files that don't fit into DB

Data lakehouse aims to integrate these two, I don't think it's a totally stupid idea.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, fair. Wasn't so much sneering at the idea of data storage, but the "data lakehouse" jumped out at me as a possible fun term to bring up.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So data lake and data warehouse are different words for the giant databases of business data that you can perform analytics on to understand your deep business lore or whatever. I assume that a data lake house is similar to the other two but poorly maintained and inconvenient to access, but with a very nice UI and a boat dock.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 3 points 5 hours ago

I’m pretty sure a data lakehouse is a database where if you insert data in it, it only appears two years later/earlier, and if you try to read from it, all the entries come from two years in the future/past. It’s very prone to predestination issues but can help with finding love

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 17 hours ago

Little late but just found out that Google has partnered with Movember to push Gemini.

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

@cityofangelle.bsky.social comments:

HAHAAHHAHAAHHAAA

Anthropic has posted two jobs, both paying $200K+.

FOR WRITERS. (Looks like a policy/comms hybrid.)

ANTHROPIC.

IS WILLING TO PAY HALF A MILLION A YEAR.

FOR WRITERS.

Whatsamatter boys, can't your plagiarism machine make a compelling case for you?

LOL. LMAO, even.

[–] catsalad@infosec.exchange 6 points 21 hours ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 ᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏ

[–] menos@todon.eu 6 points 1 day ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 Apparently they're doing the same with video cutters, offering fairly well paid jobs for people to try and make themselves redundant.

[–] phil_stevens@mastodon.nz 6 points 1 day ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 Maybe they just need to be *really* good at writing prompts.

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Continuation of the lesswrong drama I posted about recently:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=nMaWdu727wh8ukGms

Did you know that post authors can moderate their own comments section? Someone disagreeing with you too much but getting upvoted? You can ban them from your responding to your post (but not block them entirely???)! And, the cherry on top of this questionable moderation "feature", guess why it was implemented? Eliezer Yudkowsky was mad about highly upvoted comments responding to his post that he felt didn't get him or didn't deserve that, so instead of asking moderators to block on a case-by-case basis (or, acasual God forbid, consider maybe if the communication problem was on his end), he asked for a modification to the lesswrong forums to enable authors to ban people (and delete the offending replies!!!) from their posts! It's such a bizarre forum moderation choice, but I guess habryka knew who the real leader is and had it implemented.

Eliezer himself is called to weigh in:

It's indeed the case that I haven't been attracted back to LW by the moderation options that I hoped might accomplish that. Even dealing with Twitter feels better than dealing with LW comments, where people are putting more effort into more complicated misinterpretations and getting more visibly upvoted in a way that feels worse. The last time I wanted to post something that felt like it belonged on LW, I would have only done that if it'd had Twitter's options for turning off commenting entirely.

So yes, I suppose that people could go ahead and make this decision without me. I haven't been using my moderation powers to delete the elaborate-misinterpretation comments because it does not feel like the system is set up to make that seem like a sympathetic decision to the audience, and does waste the effort of the people who perhaps imagine themselves to be dutiful commentators.

Uh, considering his recent twitter post... this sure is something. Also" "it does not feel like the system is set up to make that seem like a sympathetic decision to the audience" no shit sherlock, deleting a highly upvoted reply because it feels like too much effort to respond to is in fact going to make people unsympathetic (at the least).

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From this (indirectly) I learned that they got wordpress.com to sponsor their "Inkhaven Residency". Feh.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

ooooh photographic matthew embarking upon his f*shtech turn out loud at last?

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 15 hours ago

Maybe? Or maybe they just had the right social connections to sell "blogging residency" as a thing that should be supported for some unspecified amount? I couldn't find any more details.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Small forum tyrants

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry my brain's already clocked out for the day (/week?), so [insert sneer here]

context is this

Meanwhile, the $800 million Kraken raised across its two recent rounds of financing further solidifies the company’s balance sheet before its planned IPO next year.... Prior to the two rounds, Kraken had raised only $27 million in venture capital.

simply a mere 29.6x amplification. perfectly normal. 12000000% in line with the economic market shift between checks notes Less Than A Decade Ago and now

[–] istewart@awful.systems 3 points 20 hours ago

Reeks to me of a mad dash for all-important "exit" on the part of the VC firms who invested. Especially as public-market IPOs have become so rare compared to M&A deals or SPAC bullshit.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›