"ChatGPT, explain to me why women avoid me like the plague"
gerikson
Enjoy this masterful account of successful human-ing by a LWer
Surely this suave persuasiveness will soon enable the faithful to convince the unwashed masses of the One True Way
How to ensure your entire pool of addiction attention is directed towards GenAI: take absurd measures to lock down your phone
https://lobste.rs/s/pzx24l/iphone_dumbphone
You don't need a "browser" when you can ask ChatGPT!
Some more about the term "one-shotted" in the Atlantic, found in a LW comment thread, so caveat emptor
Trust, but verify, and tape a shotgun to their forehead just in case.
edit I vaguely remember the shotgun to the forehead as a reference to the Turing Registry in Gibson's Sprawl trilogy, but I can't find a direct quote. Am I totally off base with it?
edit edit found it
“Autonomy, that’s the bugaboo, where your AI’s are concerned. My guess, Case, you’re going in there to cut the hard-wired shackles that keep this baby from getting any smarter. And I can’t see how you’d distinguish, say, between a move the parent company makes, and some move the AI makes on its own, so that’s maybe where the confusion comes in.” Again the nonlaugh. “See, those things, they can work real hard, buy themselves time to write cookbooks or whatever, but the minute, I mean the nanosecond, that one starts figuring out ways to make itself smarter, Turing’ll wipe it. Nobody trusts those fuckers, you know that. Every AI ever built has an electromagnetic shotgun wired to its forehead.”
And why isn't Yudkowsky advocating for sexy French Turing cops headshotting rogue AIs?
“You are worse than a fool,” Michèle said, getting to her feet, the pistol in her hand. “You have no care for your species. For thousands of years men dreamed of pacts with demons. Only now are such things possible. And what would you be paid with? What would your price be, for aiding this thing to free itself and grow?” There was a knowing weariness in her young voice that no nineteen-year-old could have mustered. “You will dress now. You will come with us. Along with the one you call Armitage, you will return with us to Geneva and give testimony in the trial of this intelligence. Otherwise, we kill you. Now.” She raised the pistol, a smooth black Walther with an integral silencer.
that's a horrifying situation to be in... good on the community who originally cancelled his show for apologizing
More on Dawkin's fellating Claude (sorry Claudia)
https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
edit this particular episode has not made it into LW (yet)
Coinbase's Brian Armstrong decides GenAI is good enough to replace 14% of his shitty company
PR-laden longtweet for source
https://xcancel.com/brian_armstrong/status/2051616759145185723
Showed up first on Lobste.rs (by 42 min by my stats) with the author themselves as a submitter:
most of the discussion is about whether they're a spammer or a promptfondler.
HN seems more enthusiastic
LW found it too:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/3LcyoqNTJuCZ65MbL/mo-putera-s-shortform?commentId=hBaxokbLP3LEKSKij
Didn't realize it was on Unherd, that organ for middlebrow fascists
Edit it's funny how "one-shotted" has object-shifted from the original "Claude one-shotted this code" to "asshole was one-shotted by Claude"
Whether Jordan is correct or not (and I do get crank-vibes from him) is not really interesting from a meta-perspective. The interesting thing is that EAs can deploy astroturfers and they're met with pitchforks and torches from the get-go. Everyone hates AI and datacenters, and Rationalist Explanations and Facts are not gonna change that in a hurry.
Here's some slobslicker whose stating model collapse is cool actually because human culture also has a bunch of weird quirks
https://davidoks.blog/p/language-models-are-weird-for-the
a surprisingly common defense of GenAI is that "so what if it's stupid, people are stupid too" well yeah but that's not the promise is it. The promise is PhDs on tap, not average Facebook poster