this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10675 readers
449 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wanna say "duh", but Canada really does appear way behind on this so maybe it is still a revelation for some?

[–] Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, not really, even here in Alberta Calgary and Edmonton have some rather impressive TOD (Transit Oriented Development) projects.

The Bonnie Doon redevelopment in Edmonton along the Valley Line LRT, and Calgary's long-term plans for the new Green Line for the Ctrain are great examples.

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 0 points 6 days ago

These are indeed good examples.

Perhaps over the last 50 years, there are parts of Asia that build whole neighbourhoods with public transit in mind, and mixed-use zoning. They don't have nearly the same learning curve to conquer as Alberta does...and they almost certainly don't take +10 years to figure out how a line is supposed to interact with traffic lights.

I suppose "transit oriented development" are critical baby steps...but to some these are really small baby steps.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/highly-anticipated-metro-lrt-line-opens-to-public/

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

A recent episode of Tech Won't Save Us about cars made a nice point about this stuff:

if you build near transit and remove rules around minimum levels for parking spots, you can lower the cost of development significantly, since you either need less underground parking, or less land for parking lots.

Cars make housing less affordable!

[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Don't let businesses own residential property and limit citizens to 3 residences max. The one ly people who will complain are the lazy entitled wealthy.