Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
my girlfriend is a (fashion) model: π
my girlfriend is a (fashion) model: βΉοΈ (on top of being constantly stressed out about her livelihood being tied to her physical appearance, now AI image gen threatens her entire industry)
[disclaimer i do not actually have a gf. i'm a mentally ill lemmy nerd fuckin pray for me bros]
upvoted for the disclaimer bc relatable
π
iβm a mentally ill lemmy nerd fuckin pray for me bros
I'm not mentally ill so I can't send prayers. I'll send thoughts instead, mainly happy thoughts about me not being mentally ill.
[Disclaimer: Not only am I mentally ill and not a dog, but I'm a chronic liar as well.]
Disclaimer: Not only am I mentally ill and not a dog, but I'm a chronic liar as well.]
Wait. You're saying you might not be a doctor? I might have to rethink the advice you've provided me.
Look man if I can get a girl to ask me out by being a complete wackadoodle (then break up with me before Valentineβs Day, but thatβs beside the point) YOU CAN DO IT TOO, I BELIVE IT YOU JUST GO FOR IT
(Damn I should really take my own advice)
Some girls are attracted to weird. Unfortunately for you that doesn't map to actually liking weird
Maybe something like wanting to fix someone but being unable to
i live in the only city in my county with three lesbian bars i have negative excuses lol
well aside from being really broke i guess
There aren't cities with three lesbian bars in thrm anymore. Not a thing.
NYC has Henrietta Hudson, Cubbyhole, and Ginger's
technically only Henrietta is an official lesbian bar, but Cubbyhole and Ginger's crowds are usually β₯80% lesbians and other queer femmes in my experience
Okay, sure, maybe new York, if you count unofficial.
Does not work for many of us
True this is just my own experience and last I checked, my experience is not universal, however the point I was trying to get across is that i believe in you whatever you do (morals permitting)
there is going to be a lot of ghosting during the ai crash
It already sort of happened with GPT5, people were contemplating suicide over the AI becoming less personable
I don't want to give grok/such the traffic but is it much less personable? Like did some of these people become friends with an AI, then get forced to move to an AI that treats them worse?
I've never tried to have a conversation with one like that. I did try to ask one to help me figure out what was wrong with a docker container I was trying to set up. Think I ended up just tossing it and starting from scratch after I had clearly set something up wrong initially, then got the AI just went in loops trying to get me to try the same things over and over. Haven't tried them recently
I read an article about that and apparently the change to the model made the ai stop responding to affectionate solicitations with the same sort of affectionate tone in reply. It got more businesslike, and less intimate.
I definitely got weirded out asking a GPT3 model about something and it got clingy.
Now I see it more like a search engine, skim the wall of text to find the useful information. Today I gave it a lot of context and explained what I had done and the error I got and it more or less told me you did everything correctly, and suggested stuff I already tried. It's way of saying "I don't know".
Like did some of these people become friends with an AI, then get forced to move to an AI that treats them worse?
Basically yes, it's the normie version of testing out different models and finding one they like.
And "friends"? That's a bit oversimplification, but when I tested out models on my personal AI rig I could use all sorts of models and write my own system prompts. Using a default character sheet as the benchmark, various models gave off vastly different "personalities" in their answer.
Some of them I liked so much I went back to the "nice" models after testing various others, not too concerned with quantization accuracy or parameter size. But I tested for personality, creativity, empathic mimicry and so on - Not for factual answers. Not even the giant, up-to-date models are usable for facts.
Marvin the Paranoid Android powered by an uncencored sci-fi horror LLM is delightful fun, finally someone on my level of positive outlook on things!
I've had an acquaintance express actual anger at me for questioning the output of Grok. Granted, the man is one of the dumbest people I know, but I'm still concerned. No one's immune to being psychologically manipulated, even if you're aware of it happening. People who think they're friends with bikini-streamers even less so.
I find Grok great for research, ChatGPT great for fun and image gen, clause great for coding, gemini (google) good for quick tech dev/admin ops related searches.
Thatβs how Iβd best describe what I use each for.
Do you find grok to be shit at everything? I find it does best/fastest when intermediate searching the web is required, it does that and sources it well. Asking something crazy like βwhatβs the best product for killing some yellow weed in New Mexicoβ will typically result in nice tables comparing products with links and details like that.
Where would you put Copilot? Along with ChatGPT?
Copilot is GPT. MS doesnβt have its own model.
Oh, I thought it was referring to like an OF model in 2026, and was confused. AI makes more sense.
I assumed that too. The idea of a girlfriend who does porn is an uncomfortable thing to most so makes sense in that way, but I think the OF explosion is earlier than the meme's years.
The AI joke is good though
I used to date a fairly popular camgirl. Like βshe made more money in a 4 hour stream than I made in a monthβ popular. She eventually grew to hate the work, but the money was too good for her to pass up.
The βitβs not dating if youβre paying herβ jokes got old pretty quick.
Why in the everloving fuck is there a fucked up facebook for company's trademark on this meme?
"Like the meme? Hire me on indeed."
LMAOOOOOO
Gross, I only date people who are Views or Controllers
Was trying to explain to them that large language model progress will start to slow down because probabilistic networks aren't good with anything that needs reproducible results, The data requirements are starting to balloon and restricting them reduces their creativity.
They brought up things like folding at home and other neural network models. So I explained to them that was a Markov state model not a generative AI.
Then they brought up Nvidia DLSS. And I do explain that that was also a CNN and Transformer model, not a generative one.
So I guess this is a long way of me saying that I don't know if a lot of people understand the distinction between generative AI and a neural network with the many flavors that comes in and I think that conflation leads to a lot of the artificial hype AI gets.
Most people don't know the diference and the AI hype is that prediction engines/Simulated AI equates neural networks.
But if you look at LLM's from a business and political point of view you might see, like me, that the point of "AI" haven't been to create artificial intelligence but rather to replace low tier workers and influence impressionable people.
That's what AI told me so it's the objective truth.
Considering I saw an article headline about a study involving a neural network labeled as "AI", definitely not.
Aren't neural networks AI by definition, if we take the academic definition into account?
I know that thermostat is an AI, because it reacts to a stimuli (current temperature) and makes an action (starts heating) basted on it's state. Which is the formal AI definition.
Wait. That actually means transformers are not AI by definition. Hmm, I need to look into it some more.
EDIT: I was confusing things, that's the definition of AI Agent. I'll go research the AI definition some more :D
Yes, neural networks are, usually, AI, but no, thermostats are not AI.
The definition of AI is more or less "a machine that can accomplish something that an intelligent thing like a human can do but which would be unfeasible or impossible to create an explicit algorithm for the machine to follow in order to accomplish it."
So natural language translation is AI: before it became usable in the 2000s, this was seen as something that only humans could do. Producing meaningful text and recognisable images from scratch or a prompt is AI for the same reason.
On the threadiverse people equate AI with Artificial General Intelligence, i.e. something capable of true reasoning, with something we might call "understanding" (not a concept that I can attempt to define, but if you think about that ability which LLMs lack in spite of being able to produce text as if they had it) but this is ahistorical.
I always just considered AI as a CS field that included things like planning, pathfinding, logic and symbolic reasoning, and ML, of course. Most of it is built on optimization and constraint satisfaction algorithms.
Pathfinding is another great example.
edits girlfriend in Blender
Ah, a photo model!
Elon Musk: βI only date modelsβ
My wife has more dense layers than convolutional layers nowadays, but father time comes for us all, amirite?
A model, idiot.
A eugooglelizer, one who speaks at funerals.
I don't get it.
Why does it say 2026? This is happening right now.
She's a model and she's looking good
I'd like to take her home, that's understood
She plays hard to get, she smiles from time to time
It only takes a camera to change her mind