this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
243 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7799 readers
648 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 78 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Apparently I am financially able to pay someone else's mortgage but I am not allowed to have my own.

[โ€“] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Back in the 90s the landlords in my area required you make 3-4x the rent.

[โ€“] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 36 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Bet it becomes less if they elect a Reform government! /s

[โ€“] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 24 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

We can't pay our bills so we're going to support another billionaire backed party that tells us brown people are the cause of all our woes.

[โ€“] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 4 weeks ago

It's happening in your country too. The status quo is clearly untenable, so people will vote for the one who offers to change it. Reform UK willbe terrible for everyone but the wealthy, but people are done with parties that only seek to assist the wealthy. Labour's austerity refusal to aid British citizens will only lose them votes

"Brown people are the ones that own all the real estate and keep demanding higher rent! I'm just an innocent little landlord... my hands are tied! I'm oppressed!"

[โ€“] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 4 weeks ago

And not just any regular asshole billionaire, but putler.

[โ€“] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 7 points 4 weeks ago

I'm sure they'll divide it by half

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 26 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

We really need to tax the wealth of rich fucks and force them to sell their assets to commoners like us. We need to start owning stuff again.

[โ€“] AgentRocket@feddit.org 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree, but to afford the stuff we also need to increase wages to a level where they match the increased cost of living. Otherwise, the only people able to afford the assets, that the rich will be forced to sell are slightly less rich fucks, because regular folks still have to spend all their income on food and stuff like that.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 weeks ago

If the wealth tax were introduced and the income tax removed (or the lower bracket increase to something like 100k), that would create a lot of air.

Setting the wealth tax low enough (say 10M) would include not only the ultra-wealth but the very wealth too. It can also start progressively. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

[โ€“] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why stop at half measures? Just do a socialist revolution already.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If things were that easy, there would've been a revolution already. Taxing wealth a step in the right direction. Also, revolutions don't always turn out well. Just look at the Arab spring.

[โ€“] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No one said anything about revolution being easy, and yes, they usually aren't successful if they are spontaneous and don't have serious organization behind them (and/or if world superpowers intercede and prevent success).

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 4 weeks ago

What would a socialist revolution look like? What would the end result be?

[โ€“] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's ~50โ„… more than it should be in a healthy economy

[โ€“] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's ~100% more than it needs to be period. We're past the need to have entry fees for basic standards of living.

[โ€“] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not only in Britain. Nordic country, slightly rural, I pay about that 44%. Previously, in the capital region, my rent was roughly two thirds of my wages. And that wasn't even in the center.

[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The average wage were I am - Portugal - is โ‚ฌ1,741 before tax, whilst the average rent is โ‚ฌ1,220 (for a 2-bedroom appartment)

Specifically for a 1-bedroom appartment it's between โ‚ฌ1500 in Lisbon and about โ‚ฌ600 in the cheapest possible city.

So the average rent (for a 2-bedroom) is over 2/3 of average wage, whilst for a 1-bedroom it's between 86% of a single average wage in Lisbon and 34% in the cheapest city.

Mind you, it has long been the case that, for example, to live near Lisbon in average both members of an university educated middle class couple must work full time, otherwise they can't afford it.

Oh, and minimum wage in Portugal is โ‚ฌ870, which means that for example a couple both earning minimum wage in Lisbon can only afford a 1-bedroom appartment if they don't actually eat for most of the month.

Unsurprisingly birth rates in Portugal are some of the worst in the World.

The really entertaining thing is how successive governments have done all they can to push house prices up (same in Britain by the way: I lived there for over a decade and there too it was always government policy to prop-up the realestate market) so house prices in Portugal went up 17% just this year, and house prices going up invariably drag rents up.

(But hey, at least our Realestate Investor Prime Minister - who owns 54 properties - is 17% richer just this year).

According to the DWS Housing Affordability Report 2025 (pdf) - page 4 on the linked pdf contains a diagram comparing global cities - lists London among the least affordable cities citing. Within Europe, only Lisbon is less affordable.

In a nutshell:

  • Salt Lake City and Austin maintain first and second place as the most affordable locations, while Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney climb the ranks compared to last year, completing the top five.
  • US cities continue to be some of the most affordable globally, due to high income levels and often fewer supply barriers. Five US cities appear in the top 10, including San Francisco. However, New York and Miami remain notable outliers.
  • Australian cities also score well, although Indian and Chinese cities pull down the APAC average.
  • Europe sits squarely in the middle, although with notable outliers including a surprisingly affordable Munich, and the increasingly expensive home of digital nomads, Lisbon.
  • Despite low affordability, global cities like London, Paris, New York, Berlin and Tokyo continue to attract people through their culture, career opportunities, energy and lifestyle โ€“ making high rents a price many still appear willing to pay
[โ€“] KraeuterRoy@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

Take back control, innit?

[โ€“] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

"Swallows" instead of "gorges on"?

"Gulps down"? "Gargles", "gobbles", et al?

Pfft.

[โ€“] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Average! It's worse for many.

[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I lived in Britain for over a decade and every single government during that time had policies to prop up realestate prices.

Frankly I'm surprised it's only 44% of average wages.

I bet the picture is far worse if you look at the norm of wages (i.e. the value around which most wages are) rather than the average.