this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
214 points (90.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44420 readers
1107 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its the dumbest fucking advice I've found since everything is centralised and run from head offices but they dont seem to understand thats not a thing

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 221 points 1 month ago (6 children)

My dad was a big believer of this when I was younger. Finally I humored him and had him drive me around town as I went into every buisness ask for a paper application. I printed and stapled 30 resumes for the trip, got dressed up, on the way into town he was so smug about how I was finally "really trying to get hired". Four hours later, we'd been to nearly 50 businesses, I'd gotten two paper applications and only 16 of my resumes were accepted. Everyone else said to apply online or "we only hire through the temp agencies". My dad for his part took it way harder than me. I think he actually realized that's not how it works anymore because he never suggested it again and took me seriously when I said I'd been putting in applications online.

[–] marighost@piefed.social 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Congrats on getting your dad to change his mind, even if begrudgingly.

There are so many people in his generation that simply do not understand what this job market is like, what navigating Indeed or LinkedIn is like, or how people apply for those jobs anymore. Very little human interaction happens applying for jobs these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 58 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The part that gets me is they surely cant have had any recent success with it. Like, the first time they ever get to following their own advice in the modern day, they inevitably realize its bullshit. They voted and used their positions or authority in society to literally make it so that wasnt a thing that would ever be possible after them, shareholders dont care for opportunity or paying to train anyone or giving any rando a chance anymore

That would conflict with all the big cash payoffs

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Have you heard the expression 'pulling the ladder up after themselves' in relation to Booomers, and the housing/labour market?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Blaming the generation for losing to the 1972 biz roundtable plot would utterly condemn our own as things are getting way way worse right now.

Their and our sins were not stopping a ruling class power grab.

We need to organize. They are organized.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

also he might not realizing before AI, they were using Software to screen out peoples resume, or keep peoples resume just for the sake of weeding out people. and many listings purposely have no plans of hiring at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 102 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They believe that because that's how it used to work (and still does in some industries). That's their lived experience.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it definitely didn't work that way for Black boomers

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe not in general, but it IS the reason that if you look at photos of the million man march, they're all dressed up. Reason being, they were afraid any media coverage would paint them as degdnerates, thugs, and vandals. It's much harder to paint that picture if they're marching in unison wearing 3 piece suits, and their sunday best.

This in the middle of the summer when that was wildly uncomfortable.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was also a time when a man wouldn't dare leave his house without wearing a hat.

Times have changed. The only people who care about the shit anymore are boomers. People can go to work in the pajamas for all I care.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

This. I work in un-unionized trades, which is arguably the least changed career since the time of the Boomers, and this advice does still actually apply

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Lived experience and/or delusion. Many can't seem to absorb that the labour market didn't stop changing in 19-fucking-73, and it shows.

I couldn't believe how dogshit so much of their advice was the last time I was searching for new work, and how irate they were that I wouldn't take it - because it was useless and/or hazardous to my financial stability in the situation at hand. That coffee drinks-avocado toast shit seemed like satire at first, but some of them actually believe it, and had I been spineless/stupid enough to allow them to push me into the courses of action they were insisting on I think that it might have killed me.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Naughty corporations” made me chuckle, but “I don’t know what the solution is” definitely rang true.

Most boomers actually don’t know where to begin, even though many of the solutions would be a 6-year-old’s first guess, and are actually proven to work, simply because they grew up being told that every single one of those obvious, proven solutions were “socialist” and that socialism was anti-American.

That indoctrination was so thorough that these solutions can be put right in front of them, gift-wrapped, with a neon arrow pointing at an easy button labeled “fix that shit,” and they’ll still shrug and say “we’re all out of ideas, maybe ask a billionaire what to do, surely they know how to fix the system.”

And the sad part is that they do and, in fact, already did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's what happened to them. If they were white.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 month ago

Because that's how it worked for pretty much everything back in the day when your chances of getting a loan from the bank depended on the impression of trustworthiness you projected on the bank manager when you asked for it, rather than some obscure algorithm running in the bank's systems that didn't take in account any feedback from an actual human.

Amongst large companies automation removed humans from the loop, at least at an early stage, so now your machine processable input and/or information about you extracted from some other sources about what you've done so far, matching whatever the algorithm is configured to favor is all that matters. Sure, beyond that you'll almost certainly end up with a person making a final decision (for hiring, not for bank loans), but you first have to pass that big initial automated hurdle that's supposed to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Amongst other things this has killed "being judged as having potential" as a way to get a foot on the door, unless you have a high score on a metric supposedly correlated to it such as good grades at a supposedly elite university, since unlike "impression" such metrics can be mathematically evaluated and compared by algorithms.

Mind you, when looking for work in smaller companies that haven't outsourced their hiring, impressions still work since your first point of contact is going to be a person whose opinion counts rather than an algorithm or a person too low on the pecking scale for their judgement to be taken in account.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Because life was literally that easy for them.

If they had a pulse, they usually got the job

You were guaranteed if you also dressed like the fancy people on television.

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago

The world has changed for sure. They still have their positions but how they got them no longer works. The pay no lomger buys either.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This works for small businesses. Sending them an email will just wind up in spam. But show up in person, and you might get to talk to an actual person. This distinguishes you from some random, semi-anonymous piece of paper or text header.

If you're applying at some gigantic mega-corporation, then none of that matters. They won't have time to see you anyway, and will only look at your application if they specifically asked you to give them one.

Yeah I was going to say the same. Currently work at a small business run by a boomer so if the random person walking in looking for a job happens to catch him there's a 50/50 chance that person will get hired. Bonus if the person looking for work has a degree from a ivy league university, boomers love that shit. I don't know why someone with that sort of degree would be applying for a low wage small business job but the job market is a bit crazy nowadays.

The practice can backfire of course - I've seen the same boomer boss hire other boomers that barely know how to use a computer and then proceed to fail at his/her job spectacularly. It's interesting when you run into boomers looking for work and it turns out they spent most of their career relying on others to deal with the mundane tasks of dealing with email, spreadsheets, etc. So many of them spent their careers falling upwards into management roles until they were laid off/fired/whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can get into a lotta places wearing a hard hat and reflective vest while carrying a ladder.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Or a clip board with some technical papers on it, in case you don't want to lug a ladder.

[–] IdontplaytheTrombone@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's what they did the last time they searched for a job. It used to work.

[–] Clathrate_Gun@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

This.
It’s old advice that used to work, and it worked very well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I've never encountered anyone of any age that thinks that. Presentation of yourself is important, but nobody has ever even implied that just looking nice is enough to get everything. It's simply part of the whole equation.

Generationally, the only thing here I've seen disconnected between Boomers/Xers and yoinger generations like my own and Gen Z are that they have a different sense of what looks good or professional. Personally, I like that younger people also hate suits. Suits are stupid.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every generation just gets more casual and I love it!

Pretty soon I won't even need to put on pants to run to the store!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

I would love to live like an actual cartoon dog and only wear tshirts to express myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

There is also such a thing as trying too hard. I once saw a guy show up in a blue button shirt with white collar and tie, to apply for a cook job. He got the job, and was good. But that outfit was a fucking costume and all it communicated was “I am into putting on a false front.”

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Suits aren't stupid! There's casual suits, for one, and really there's suits for basically every occasion... There's so many different fits, different materials, different cuts...

That's just such a violent generalization, I simply can't stand by and say nothing.

Maybe the idea you have of a "suit", in your mind, sucks balls, but suits certainly don't suck balls.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only suits that aren't stupid are fursuits. 😤

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, I agree with you, I do, buuuuut

If someone shows up to an interview wearing pajamas, they are probably less likely to get a job. So you do have to dress up a little bit, depending on what the job is.

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not even just job stuff, its as impractical as pushing you to apply for something government related and that your dressing up and showing up in person will somehow override literal requirements you know you dont meet

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gen-X here. The reason they're giving you that advice is because that used to actually work. If you wanted a job, for instance, you needed to comb through newspapers or physically go around and look for places that were hiring. It wasn't uncommon for ads to to say "apply in person." Without the Internet making applying for a job almost trivially easy compared to how it used to be, going through the extra effort of showing up dressed professionally was a way to show that you were serious and willing to put in real effort.

The Boomers and Gen-Xers telling you to do the same aren't living in the same decade as the rest of us, mostly because the Internet wasn't pervasive in the time they were looking for jobs. Back in the 90s the Internet was kinda a novelty that you had to go looking for. It wasn't, IMO, until smart phones came along that being online REALLY took off, though arguably iMac computers really pushed the "tech is trendy" idea out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] python@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Movie recommendation - Catch me if you can (2002)! Apparently Jobs used to work like that so much that in the late 1960's a 16 year old just conned his way into becoming a pilot, a doctor and a lawyer with no previous qualifications.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You should probably know the best con that Abagnale pulled is making people believe he actually did all of those things. Journalists have discovered that the vast majority of his claims are completely fabricated.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If I remember correctly he was also kinda a creep. Stalking women and what not.

If you want a good con look up the story about England’s brief #1 restaurant the shed at dulwich

Dude made a fake restaurant that became #1 on trip advisor even though it never existed. He then did one fake day of operation where he served microwave tv diners. Then when he was found out he did a bunch of interviews…. Except he didn’t, he hired actors to pretend to be him.

That’s the kinda con man I like.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

It does work sometimes because people can ignore an email or phone call, but its harder to ignore a person standing in front of you.

As an example we were contacting a business abut something we offered that we knew they needed.

Emails and phonecalls always got the reply of: I have left a note for the owner and when he has time he will contact you.

After months of that, and us happening to be in their area, we just dropped in unnounanced and asked for the owner.

He engaged with us , asked lots of questions, asked for samples and info. As we were doing that the secretary realized who we were and said something like " oh I've been meaning to have you read their emails and setup a meeting" lol

Too late lady.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago

The only time showing up in person works in the UK is if you're a teenager looking for part time or apprenticeship work in independent shops/hospitality/mechanics etc.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It depends upon the setting and what you want. Showing up to a McDonalds shift in a suite and tie trying to get the CEO job. Not so much.

Showing up to your first office job and meeting with your bosses in a nice polo or button down shirt and slacks looking professional, yes. It signals you are eager and want to succeed. Which will go a long way.

Of course you still have to put the work in. But your boss will be more likely to give you more training/work/promotions if they know you want to learn and work over someone who doesn’t give a shit.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, they aren't talking about for an interview. They are talking about going in someplace in a suit and asking for a job. My mother insisted I did this when I got out of college. It only took a few receptionists looking at me like I'm crazy to be reaffirmed that this was a dumb idea. Even places that did have openings told me to apply online.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I think they mean in the context of getting a job. At least that’s what most of the reactions seem to assume. The post really doesn’t have enough detail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

with job sites being the primary source of job hunting, you wont even get a chance in most cases to even an interview. and you can just show up to a business with a suit on, and demand to see a interviewer.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago

You need to know someone who works there I find. That way they actually read your CV.

load more comments
view more: next ›