this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
173 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

6903 readers
989 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley companies yet again deciding if they should involve themselves in affairs they have no business being a part of. Where the fuck is Congress?? Oh right, eating out of these fuckers’ platinum assholes.

There’s obviously no way this could ever go wrong, Silicon Valley companies always make decisions based on what’s ethically and morally best for everyone, so I’m sure they’ll make the right call.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't be evil... Oh wait...

[–] Damn990099@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We could make more... Money...

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tech bros: "But what if AI could have a little murder rampage, as a treat?"

[–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago

Tech CEOs are privileged people who will do what ever and say what ever to make lots of money.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love the idea of a fancy autocomplete trained on Reddit and 4-chan deciding whether or not someone should be murdered or not. Sounds like a fantastic idea.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Hmm, who would be on the list?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

“Obviously not… but, then again… money…

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Speaking of things that are deadly, that mullet/soul patch combo in the preview is rough

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At long last we've created killer drones from the cautionary short film "Slaughterbots".

Of course, given how jank what we've decided to call "AI" is if you tried to make a real Slaughterbot it'd probably be blowing up random people or patches of the wall that it thought looked like a face.

[–] lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s time to get those parts to build an EMP.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

Someone make a project called OpenEMP quickly so we save r&d time

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Do not create the Torment Nexus.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

SV: No, that would be unethical.

Armies: But we'll give you lots of money.

SV: Oh, yes then.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Don’t be evil.

Billions of dollars later.

Ok, do be evil.

[–] mydude@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

This is fucking sick

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

If it decides tech bros and billionaires are legitimate targets, sure.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

They want autonomous weapons and they want AGI to save us from climate change. I don't believe AGI will happen but they'll probably settle for faking something that fools the masses and lets them set the agenda. Then it's flame throwing robot dogs for everyone.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has no word in this. It's givernments who decide what kind of weapons they want for their militaries.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has lobbying money

[–] Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

If silicone valley has the AI and the AI has internet access you all are suckers for ever thinking you have anything. It's all gone. Bye!

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

"What's a viable business model for all these idiot robots we keep building?"

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Stupid looking goon should be the one to go first

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Sure they are going to allow it for the reason that they will gain more money

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

It already is

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

Hack one of that automated turrets and change the promp sounds pretty easy.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Implement Asimov's 3(4) Laws of Robotics.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Eventually? Maybe, but frankly Asimov had those rules for a reason. Now? It can't even decide what it said a second ago.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The current discussions of LLM and algorithmic learning being referred to as "Artificial Intelligence", is super duper frustrating to all us science fiction fans. There is no AI in the Asmiov sense, no one is even trying to make that form of AI.

Having said all that, and this is the coldest take ever. Robots shouldn't kill people.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At best, LLMs are a small slice of a pie that would constitute an artificial intelligence.

I suppose you could look at this 2 ways: either, when we talk about the state of AI, we could say that, yes, we have it, but only this one small part that kinda works ok; or (the more traditional route) would be to say that AI doesn’t exist until all of the constituent technologies have been both developed and assembled.

Obviously, we know which one the marketing departments of many companies choose.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Doesn’t matter because AI will be weaponized against the masses no matter what your opinion of it is. It’s the billionaires with the money and influence to make sure it becomes a weapon and they will 100% be beneficiaries of said weapons so OF FUCKING COURSE they will use it.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Ok so just imagine this guy doing a TED presentation ala Weyland in the first Alien reboot movie, and just splice that as the intro to the first Terminator movie.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The answer is no. But of course some idiot is going to do it and make the thing able to self replicate and fuel from "biomass".

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

ha ha ha, no way a farrow plague upon your house

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Nuke Silicon Valley

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I remember that show, maybe I should pick it back up