this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
650 points (99.2% liked)

News

34199 readers
3209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide, the justices this fall will consider for the first time whether to take up a case that explicitly asks them to overturn that decision.

Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.

In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 269 points 5 months ago (8 children)

You're not free to enforce your religion on others as a public servant.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 183 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes you are. Crime is legal now as long as you’re a conservative

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 96 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Supreme Court: We're public servants and we're free to enforce our religion on others.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago

Enter Trump

Now it is!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 87 points 5 months ago (4 children)

If they're going to open the door to any government employee being able to refuse to do their job as directed on religious grounds, this country is going to grind to a halt.

Just kidding, we all know that with the current court and administration, this will only allow people with the "right" religion to refuse.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 5 months ago

An in-group that the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group that the law binds but does not protect. Conservatism in a nutshell.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

this country is going to grind to a halt

In large part, it's already been on that road for a while. De-industrialization, hyper-financialization, launching a pogrom against migrants, sky high tariffs fucking up the supply chain...

This is one more bail of straw on the camel's overloaded back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 75 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Could we just get government out of the marriage game? It seems to be the source of all the problems. They simply shouldn't care.

Even if we don't this is such a simple concept: Marriage is a contract. The requirements for a contract is consenting adults. How can they make gender determine who can sign a contract? That would be unreasonable.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you're second point is more important. The religious part of marriage is actually meaningless in the eyes of the law even today, you still need to apply for a marriage certificate with the government.

I think we just need to extend that to just be a cohabitation/shared asset contract for any two+ people. It makes a lot of legal sense to have a defined "family unit" for medical/legal/financial reasons, but it shouldn't overlap with religious concepts.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago

Religion is a monstrous evil.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 months ago (10 children)

But Jesus said gays bad!

He didn't say anything about love!

Oh, wait...

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

But it's stress, pain and suffering for those they don't like!!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Of course they are. And of course that stupid bitch Kim Davis is involved.

Also: how could Joe Biden and Kamala Harris do this to us?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Also: really glad protest voters sat this one out, I can't begin to imagine how much worse this would be under Kamala /s

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 5 months ago

Can this bitch just fucking die already? I'm tired of seeing her face in the news every couple years

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 61 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What a horrible, terrible, evil piece of shit of a person. A lot of people serve other people they don't like every day, it's called having a fucking job, no need to make a federal fucking case out of it you stupid selfish childish pious asshole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Who is the injured party here? She clearly refused to do her job.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

You don't understand, she was forced to undergo social contact with... shudder GAYS!

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Injured parties are for legal systems that actually care about the truth.

See several of the recent Supreme Court cases with astroturf plaintiffs and made up defendants.

Because it's super easy to get the ruling you want when no one is on the other side to call bullshit on your claims.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 5 months ago

What a hateful piece of shit.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shocked, I tell you! Shocked!

Also, what's going on with the Epstein Files? Ya know, while we're on the subject of "Dead Cat Theory"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You work for the government, you are acting as the government, paid for by taxes from your constituents.

You do not get to decide which laws to follow. Fuck off Kim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Another 3 to 6 decision then. It's getting kind of repetitive.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yooooo.... This bitch is still doing the same, heinous shit? A decade later? Why don't these pieces of shit just get fucking lives or hobbies or something? They're like goddamned ghouls, hanging around and smelling of shit. Like. Fuck. GO AWAY.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Methinks she’s being funded by those organizations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can we get someone who believes in Jakub elected as county clerk somewhere in the US South? Then they can deny marriage licenses to all the white people for being inhuman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kwyjibo1@lemmy.myserv.one 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But her divorces and multiple marriages are fine.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Petition the court to allow us to stone her to death because the Bible says so.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Fuck. Not this asshole again. She should have faded into obscurity and poverty by now.

[–] KindnessisPunk@piefed.ca 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is how it goes people, either everyone gets rights or no one gets rights.

They come for the Trans people first, how long until the come for you.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Same shit with immigration. First they say they are only going after the violent criminals and "bad hombres". Now they are racially profiling the people they snatch off the street in unmarked vans. Only a matter of time before the pool of "bad actors" expands to the political opposition.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 months ago

"Davis said she's been "called Hitler, I’ve been called [a] hypocrite, I’ve been called a homophobe."

"I’ve been called things and names that I didn’t even say when I was in the world. Those names don’t hurt me," Davis said. "What probably hurt me the worst is when someone tells me that my God does not love me or that my God is not happy with me, that I am a hypocrite of a Christian.""

Lmao, so you don't mind being called Hitler, but being called a fake Christian - now that's insulting! Tells you everything you need to know

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Depressing as hell but honestly, I’m surprised it took this long.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Would this be a record turnaround for revoking a group's rights?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (10 children)

So could she have refused to serve a black person or an Asian person based on her personal religious views that she doesn't like black or Asian people?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Woooooo here we go 🙃

Fucking knew this was gonna happen. Are they gonna do Loving v. Virginia next?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Kid David didn't exercise her free speech, she discriminated.

Edit: Fuck I'm bad at typing. Kim Davis*

[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can we just take a minute to appreciate how much forehead she has? She could star in the next Coneheads movie!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 10 points 5 months ago

It would be such a dumb move to reverse a ruling this close to its decision and with such messy consequences for thousands of couples and families, of course they are going to do it.

load more comments
view more: next ›