this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
358 points (97.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3447 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 97 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Explanation: Arabic has maintained a great literary continuity through the centuries, in part due to the importance of the Quran as the literal written word of the Divine. A translation of the Quran is only a commentary - nothing more - meaning that written Arabic has had a sort of 'hard standard' that has bound together diverse locales with a common written form of the tongue.

[–] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Depends, it also means that written and spoken arabic diverges strongly in some places, which is not a good feature for a language.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Native Arabic speaker here. Can confirm.

Although it’s not always as easy as it sounds because many words and expressions from back then aren’t relevant/in-use. Also, reading poetry from the pre-Islamic era is significantly more difficult. We still have volumes of literature (specifically poetry) that predate Islam.

The reason the language is so resilient is the use of the Quran as a reference (all translations of it aren’t considered Quran, but commentaries), and the fact we have institutes dedicated to maintaining and standardising the language as part of the Arab League (ALECSO and its subsidiaries, etc). Also, all nations of the Arab League enforce a rule that stipulates that the governments, newspapers, media/TV, and academia are required to use Modern Standard Arabic for official business across all member countries.

Regional dialects are kind of hard to understand at first, but generally speaking, we do understand each other regardless of the dialect if the two parties communicating work at it long enough. The hardest dialects to understand are from them pesky Moroccans/Tunisians with their French-every-other-word bastardisation of the language, but we figure it out eventually.

Edit: and I’m not bashing Moroccans/Tunisians/Algerians. We love you guys! ❤️

Edit: spelling, grammar

[–] clockworkrat@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't hold the French influence against them tbf

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Neither do I. We have the same problem with English and German here in Egypt (especially in the recent decades and with the advent of the internet)

Edit: also in sciences and tech, it’s becoming near impossible for the regulatory bodies involved to keep up and we have to use loan words to refer to things even in official documents.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

institutes dedicated to maintaining and standardising the language as part of the Arab League (ALECSO and its subsidiaries, etc)

With successes like Arabic, French, Korean and Turkish I don't understand how the "Descriptivism vs. Prescriptivism" debate in the anglosphere is "Descriptivism : signature look of superiority", especially since their linguistic rules are filled with more exceptions than rules, and their spelling is atrocious (although I blame the Latin roots for that, since germanic languages manage just fine)

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (19 children)

Depends on what you consider "success". English is the number one second language, after all. And besides, French, while highly regulated, is full of insanity like 420+2 you would expect a prescription would iron out, meanwhile the parts of English that were prescribed, like is*land or not ending on prepositions, are notably more weird than they would be normally.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] vivendi@programming.dev 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Persian look of signature superiority

Watch me read a 900 year old text for fun

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago

Still can't watch a movie that old without subtitles. Gotcha

[–] Raylon@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My work focuses on digitally processing texts from between 15th and 17th century in German. It's a pain and i look with envy to my colleagues working in English and French (around the same time). On the other hand, i like the challenge. :-)

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I feel like 15th and 17th century German isn't that hard??

Like yeah, archaic words here and there. Lack of standardized grammar so you have to pronounce some words first.

Still, I can understand most of what Walther von der Vogelweide wrote in the 12th/13th century without too much difficulty. I think it'd take me a month to read fluently.

[–] Raylon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You probably missed the "digitally processing" part. Reading it isn't that difficult (still much more than french or english) but due to spelling variance and some other challenges it is mich more difficult to adapt existing models and architectures designed for modern German to premodern German.

In my case, working with administrative documents, there is also a problem concerning gerne-specific words (old terms for legal xoncepts basically) which for example are not well understood by systems created for modern German.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

Oh right, I thought of digitally processing as just digitalizing which isn't quite the same.

Yeah, that sounds painful to attempt. I can imagine it's like trying to process German text today written in dialect (like the Bavarian Wikipedia).

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 12 points 5 months ago

"understanding it all" eh~

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think I read somewhere that Chinese readers are able to read 2000 year old texts with relatively little difficulty.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Chinese speaker here: No, we are not. Classical Chinese is a very different language but generally the basics are taught in school. It definitely takes significant effort because the grammar and vocabulary are completely different.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah that's apparently a thing. Same principle too, except with logograms rather than an abjad.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Written Chinese was reformed in the beginning of 20^th^ century to be closer to the spoken language.

Before that, it would have been true except written language was so distant from spoken, I would call them almost different languages (but that's because I'm no linguist, and someone here already told me that writing is not a language at all anyway), so the only literate people were able to read literature of the old

[–] grissino@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

"Whatever letter you don't know is I"

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

I know nothing about arabic, but in my opinion it's the prettiest script.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Read it all, maybe. But understand?

load more comments
view more: next ›