this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
358 points (97.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3447 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think I read somewhere that Chinese readers are able to read 2000 year old texts with relatively little difficulty.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Chinese speaker here: No, we are not. Classical Chinese is a very different language but generally the basics are taught in school. It definitely takes significant effort because the grammar and vocabulary are completely different.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah that's apparently a thing. Same principle too, except with logograms rather than an abjad.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Written Chinese was reformed in the beginning of 20^th^ century to be closer to the spoken language.

Before that, it would have been true except written language was so distant from spoken, I would call them almost different languages (but that's because I'm no linguist, and someone here already told me that writing is not a language at all anyway), so the only literate people were able to read literature of the old