this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-61 points (38.9% liked)

/0 Governance

249 readers
103 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blue_firefly@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It sometimes is nice to have an overview of what the tankies propaganda is, but really, as an anarchist their discourse is disgusting... and I feel we already have enough of the propaganda with hexbear and co, so this will be a soft no for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No way in hell. The reason I'm here is because we don't federate (and I like anarchism and piracy but that's beside the point), I left .ml the second I could when db0 popped up during the exodus. If we federate with them I'll have to switch again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. I'm not interested in being buddy-buddy with authoritarian memelords who praise North Korea with a straight face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely not, this is a terrible idea considering that they were defederated for being toxic and aggressive to our overall community, and also many people there are disingenuous in their takes, it's not a discussion community, it's brigading. The only way I could ever support anything like this is if their domain expired and someone used it to make a completely different instance.

That hasn't happened so I can't support this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm for it. We don't block all the lib instances and they're arguably more disgusting for supporting all manner of bullshit going on around the globe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Against, fuck tankies. Literal imperialist Russian propaganda mills at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deralax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I wanted censorship I would have stayed on reddit. Open the gates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No fuck the tankies. Russia is worse than ever and allowing the russian bots and bootlickers back would he a huge mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArkyonVeil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. One vehemently disagrees. The instance was built around far-left authoritarianism, while praising "communist" leaders as gods. Those who do not see the mistakes of the past, are doomed to repeat it.

One may have their personal gripes with Hexbear, but at least one doesn't think their world wraps around being purely Western contrarians.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, I disagree. The near worship of authoritarian leaders is a hard no go for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not for me, no. IMO, a lot of the users over there are only interested in cosplaying authoritarianism, which I am not personally into.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Completely forgot they were an instance so I am fine if they stay gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] somerandomperson1231@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I say yes. A 1 month trial with them seems reasonable. I may disagree with their ideas, but if a reasonable level of civility is kept I think it will be good. I can block the communities and people I disagree with the most for my viewing pleasure and others have the chance to decide what they want to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fantasyocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boo, no tankies.

TBH though, whatever you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I just spent my lunch break checking out the instance and scrolling through the top weeks posts and checking out the comments.

Hard no.

  1. Basically all their posts are political, except very pro-china, pro-marxist, anti-ukraine. Theres not a single post i consider a value add if it appeared in my scroll. Even if I gave the users and their viewpoints the benefit of the doubt, this would be like adding /r/china, /r/russia, /r/communism to my subs. I can't think of a single reason i want this.

  2. I'm not giving the users the benefit of the doubt. Their comments are indistinguishable from what a ccp or Russian employee would post.

All we would be doing is opening a potential vector for propagandists to attack. They post nothing of interest.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sure, see what happens, it's discourse. in the best (and naïve) scenario we can effect change by only banning many individual users who use bad-faith rhetoric

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm broadly against defederation in general without good material cause (such as: instance does a lot of trolling or brigading, instance hosts illegal or deeply immoral content).

I like the hexbears! There's some bad ones of course, but there's people on this instance I don't like or agree with so that's hardly an argument against. I can block the worst tankies of lemmygrad as well, or the whole instance if it really personally bothered me.

In broader terms, I think we see enough of an amount of center-lib arguments that it's essentially the water we swim in. I'm glad that out and out right wing takes are very rare, but I think some more extreme left views could be good. I don't agree with vanguardists at all but I can't act like coalition with them against overt fascists isnt necessary sometimes.

And anyway, federation isnt about political coalition. It's about exchange of ideas and I'm confident enough in the correctness of anarchy to not feel threatened by the ideas of other leftists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Federate and let people block the instance themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] No_Bark@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I say refederate. We haven't blocked any of the turbolib instances, so I think we should let users themselves decide what instance to block.

Anecdotal, but I've never had an issue with Lemmygrad or Hexbear like so many people here constantly complain about. I find both instances preferable to most of the shit that appears from places like .world

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No.

Lemmy already has serious issues of political divisiveness driving off new users. We don't need to further that "to own the libs".

While I don't truly think that's why this is being suggested, we don't seem to have a good reason to refedrate other than "they appear to be behaving lately".

Also, the optics of the timing of this occurring right as Admiral Patrick is closing dubvee over (among many things) the general tone of discussion on Lemmy being abrasive as all hell in large part due to political division spurring disrespect? Not a good look guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BootyEnthusiast@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big no.

Echoing from what some others have said, I went back 3 days worth of content from them and found ZERO worthwhile posts.

At least hexbear is somewhat funny in their shit posts, and it's easy enough to block or filter users who constantly post in their begging for money community.

Meanwhileongrad exists for a reason. I'm content enough to see the smoke from the self immolation that happens from afar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I say bring them back. If people don't like them, it's super easy for individual users to just instance-block.

.ee went away. Dubvee.org (which was a great place) went away just today. Lemmy is breaking down, and all this separation will just hasten the demise. There are plenty of tools for people to individually block things they don't like.

So my vote is for re-federating them! And thank you for bringing this up!

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's my main argument as well. Doesn't it go against the entire concept of this server to take user's choice away? Instance blocking is super simple, if anyone doesn't want to see it, they can, without it needing to be enforced on everyone.

The only reason for defederation should be admin overhead, i.e. an instance creates so much rule-breaking content that it can't be handled any other way by admins.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Lemmy's instance blocking doesn't fully block the instance users, it just hides the instance communities, so it's not equivalent to defederation.

Piefed's instance blocking does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absent any compelling reason or evidence of this proposal arising organically from the community rather than springing to life fully-formed from the forehead of an admin, no. Unless something is broken, it need not be repaired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have not been on an instance that federates with it, so personally, I don’t know what the culture is like. I’m all for building bridges with ideological cousins - modern social media is one giant machine-propelled incubator of fascist sympathy nowadays, so I really do feel strongly about having a meaningful, robust, community-driven coalition of good people with good politics. I personally believe something like BlueSky has been a big black hole vacuuming up potential fediverse users, but you could make the case as well that it puts off our eternal September for more time. Maybe it’s not the worst thing that could happen.

That said, I do hear much worse feedback about grad than I do about .ml or Hexbear. At the same time, I understand that it is one of the main instances tied to the software’s development, and that alone makes it relevant to a big instance with a tech slant like ours, IMO.

I have to abstain. I think I’d like to vote Yay, but I don’t have all the information. I don’t know enough about grad to feel capable of making a judgement.

FWIW a lot of the .ml and Hexbear bashing is ridiculous, IMO. All the complaints about a “triad” and subsequent positive interactions on these two instances have made them seem unfairly maligned to me. Maybe it’s because I live in a part of the world where politics and political violence is even more messy, and the concept of “critical support” is much more clear to me. I don’t have west-as-default baggage. So a lot of what comes off to others as apologia for states that do bad things doesn’t necessarily bother me as much as it would bother someone else. I’ve seen more frequent egregious takes on .world and ShJW. Some of those guys legitimately want Israel to turn my home into a parking lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, don't need to see more tankie shite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Better to stay defederated IMO.

They are ban heavy for daft reasons so ruins the experience for new users. It’d be different if they had daft ideas but engaged with debate; but they don’t - and it’s just feeding more people into an echo chamber that has some people just as far gone as MAGA.

Recent years have taught me the dangers of that and how little most people are able to critically think about things. Less of an issue on this instance I imagine, but even anti-authoritarian spaces are being increasingly captured by authoritarian interests.

Id support the top 5 worst offenders from the power tripping mods community to be defederated by default across as many instances as we can convince. Punish censorship.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No.

I usually don't engage with gov-stuff because this instance is running smoothly and the users (& crew) here steer it very well.

But on this I have to vote. Because historically if a left movement came into power, the dogmatic Marxists have always sought to persecute the other, especially more progressive (eg. antiauthoritarian), leftists - even if they cooperated with them before and/or helped the movement to succeed. There is a fascist wave and it is getting worse - but (left) authoritarians are not allies, they're enemies (sooner or later).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don't want that on my feed.

And to a lesser extent I don't want to see weird tankie bootlicking of China either. And I'm not talking about legit good things China has done when compared to other superpowers, I'm talking weird posts that read like full propaganda state sponsored bs, and if you disagree with them in any way they will dig through your intire account history to try and find something they can use instead of actually having a discussion about the topic you originally disagreed with.

Authoritarians don't want open discussion they will just link you half a shitty book explaining how there's actually no such thing as authoritarianism.

Edit: I'd like to add that searching lemmygrad for Ukraine will show some really awful takes. I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine, Tebet, Hong kong, el Salvador, ect just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn't mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›