Aatube

joined 2 years ago
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sure, see what happens, it's discourse. in the best (and naïve) scenario we can effect change by only banning many individual users who use bad-faith rhetoric

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (8 children)

how the heck am i supposed to read this somebody help 😭

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Based on your argument, one cannot justify the person in the swing state voting for Harris? And again, how were they defending Harris's genocide policies?

edit:fixed think-o lol, safe→swing

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Opinion discarded.

While I agree that the sentence is imperialist apologia, I disagree with this approach. There's something to be learned from everything, especially when there's much mroe than what you're focusing on.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Then how may I explain that voting for the lesser evil is the best course of action in my state's scenario? And again, how were they justifying Harris's genocide policies?

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That sounds a bit too extreme if it's a one-strike

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

How were they justifying Harris's genocide policies? Isn't defending voting for Harris defending the shitty choice?

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

Isn't "we lack agency" the exact argument you removed? Casting others in either black or white is unnecessarily flaming and often used by power-grabbers to divide the electorate and drum up perfervid support. Nobody's wholly supporting Harris or supporting her stance on the war here. I saw the thread before it was removed.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago (27 children)

I'm confused. Do you now think choosing the shitty option is justifiable or not?

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (29 children)

In my country's present institution, you have to either support evil or be filthy rich to live. Revolutions don't happen spontaneously; they build in the back corner while evil is prospering before a great ambush. As a non-white anarchist, Trump will quite possibly kill our movement if he wins. Thus, I unfortunately indulge in activities that will help us in the long run. In the dark, we help build strength. In the light, you'll help arrest the momentum.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (33 children)

Sir/Madam, you started a conversation quite−closely-linked to the election in an anarchist community in the first place. Saying "it's much better to vote for this candidate instead" is not the same as supporting the election; I don't see why lesser-evilism is bannable at all. I'm a beginner anarchist myself and there's nothing I found about working on other things/lesser evils when certain things aren't feasible.

view more: next ›