this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
1162 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

8125 readers
2953 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The National Guard of this country has murdered American citizens on numerous occasions in our country's history without a peep about prosecution later on from anybody. Don't expect it to change this time. And really don't expect them not to fire. These Weekend Warriors love the idea of killing Americans. It's what they dream of.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Nazis are Nazis. They knew what they were doing from the get go. They were just too cowardly to say it out loud.

Punch Nazis. Or they will punch you.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The only reason such a rationalization was ever brought forward is because they were brought to face judgement by a group of powers seeking to enact some form of justice for the atrocities committed.

IOW, “just following orders” will never be a defense offered if there’s nobody to put them on trial.

It’s a huge assumption that there will be anyone to put those kind of people on trial in the US and dispense any meaningful justice at this point. Current dems won’t do anything. Current judges can’t seem to pass sentences that stick.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Won’t or can’t. The dems are minorities in all branches. A bit late to be beating the blame game on the dems after they were voted out of literally all power.

And the only judges who are doing anything right now is a trump and bush appointed judges in which are just facing appeals. So that’s not on the dems either.

You really need to stop blaming dems for all the reps doing bad things.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I didn’t blame the dems for doing bad things. I blame the dems for doing nothing, or doing ineffective things. Especially when they did have the opportunity to do so.

Yeah, they can’t do anything now because they didn’t take advantage when they could.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So then by your own admission you do know they can’t do anything now. So why are you blaming the dems now? It can’t just be always the dems at fault even when the reps are clearly in the wrong here. It’s just a waste of energy and distraction at most from dealing with what is going on right now.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t need to re-explain what I said.

And I disagree with your forcing a binary choice to remove attention from the dems. I can be pissed at the dems/DNC for helping, or at least not more forcefully opposing, the events that lead us to this point AND deal with “what is going on right now.”

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You’re not looking for solutions. You’re looking to blame and be helpless and a perpetual victim. That’s your choice and I won’t waste more of my own time on such a person who chooses to spend their time in such a way.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Keep going please. Make more shit up about me to satisfy yourself.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You also jump up your own asshole cuz you enjoy the smell of it

Huh. I’ve never been the subject of someone’s public kink before. You do you.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

I will NOT thank you for your service, I will resist you and shame you to my final breath for letting the allure of guns and patriotism lead you into at best complacency towards fascism.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Wait until he finds out his holy document was concocted by genocidal enslavers... Functioning as intended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[–] foxacid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

Presidential Executive Orders

[–] troed@fedia.io 108 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While true, most of them are likely one paycheck away from having their family living in the streets. That's a powerful deterrent against refusing orders that the US has somehow mastered. That too.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 week ago

The same applies to most gang members.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“I was just living paycheck to paycheck” won’t be a valid defense either :P

[–] troed@fedia.io 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course, but most people will prioritize their own family members over others. It's an explanation, not an argument against being moral.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Except it will. As will "I was just following orders". It works for cops. It worked in Vietnam. Hell, it even worked for the majority of Nazi's; only a small percentage actually faced reprocussions for their actions.

Welcome to real history, where the good guys don't always win and the bad guys don't always lose.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 68 points 1 week ago

However it was deemed a valid defence in the trials of US war criminals in the Vietnam War.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The US literally sanctioned the ICC judges. There's not gonna be a Nuremberg trial for them lol.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have no idea if the gaurdian is a good source but I had no idea about this so I figured I'd grab an article link for anyone who also had no ideas this happened recently

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/05/marco-rubio-sanctions-icc-judges-israel-gaza

(Feel free to reply with links to better sources if you'd like :)

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 23 points 1 week ago

The guardian in general is a pretty trustworthy source afaik.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

American soldiers aren’t in the jurisdiction of the ICC or any international court anyway.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That really isn't how that works. The US has declared that they won't allow the international courts to get involved, but that doesn't necessarily prevent those courts from disagreeing.

"Jurisdiction" is only a thing when a court answers to some higher authority who has limited what that court can do. Since the international courts theoretically don't answer to the US government, they can make any ruling they like.

They're unlikely to bother, since they probably won't be in a position to enforce any ruling against typical foot soldiers, but they absolutely could if it came to that point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

America isn't in the jurisdiction of the ICC, but American soldiers who commit crimes within ICC countries are. This means that American soldiers according to international law can, for example, be prosecuted for crime they commit in support of Israel's genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's only partially true.

For starters, nearly everything German soldiers did was legal under German law.

Side tangent: GDR soldiers who killed civilians trying to flee the country could easily be prosecuted after reunification because this was explicitly illegal under GDR law.

It's harder to prosecute "legal" crimes. It requires establishing there are "natural laws" which stand above any law humans put in place. For instance, slaughtering civilians is one such violation of "natural law". It's more complex but that's the rough summary.

Besides, most German soldiers simply became prisoners of war and faced little to no legal consequences. The Nuremberg trials were mostly for those who gave the illegal order - no one has time for millions of legal cases.

I have little to no clue about US law but as far as I can tell, executive orders are legal until deemed illegal by a court. The order would therefore have to violate "natural law" - not the constitution - or be so obviously illegal beyond any reasonable doubt to allow for prosecution of those who follow it. Both of those are a very high bar to clear.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is a reason why I kinda like the psudo religious concepts that back US founding documents.

Now before everyone gets to typing about annoying evangelicals or whatever (trust me I understand) you don't have to believe in christianity or any other religious institution for the "natural law" concept to work. All it takes is an understanding that human rights are a default and don't magically disappear because your area's govt says so.

It's summed up nicely by this quote from John Locke.

"And where the Body of the People, or any single Man, is deprived of their Right, or is under the Exercise of a power without right, and have no Appeal on Earth, there they have a liberty to appeal to Heaven, whenever they judge the Cause of sufficient moment."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago

Like the US justice system gives a flying fuck about precedence anymore.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The British soldiers at the Boston Massacre and Nazi war criminals of the Holocaust had their day in court.

That's what due process is. Everyone -everyone - enemy or not, gets a trial. That's how it should be, that's how it needs to be, or there is no justice.

That's why "expedited removal" is nothing but fascism. No due process, no justice at all.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have faith that there are many people in the military chain of command who are smart enough to ‘interpret’ orders and posture deployments in a way that does not escalate and lead to killing.

ICE and the civilian LEO have less discipline and the risk of escalation is immensely higher. I’d take the National Guard who follows orders and is subject to court martial over the jack boots any day of the week.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

Hopefully you're right. Because they're going to send in Marines next.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It is important to add that even though the US has committed atrocities, for decades, from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos through Iraq, Afghanistan, and Gaza; illegal invasion, torture, genocide, war crimes; nothing meaningful ever came from it. There has never been Nuremberg trial equivalent for the United States, and there never will be. Every single president since Eisenhower, every single one, no exceptions, has been a war criminal by the standards of the Nuremberg trials and the Tokyo tribunal, and not one of them ever spent even a day in court for it.

There are no consequences for war crimes committed by Americans. None. Aside from 9/11, but the ones who died, the ones who suffered, were not the ones responsible for the atrocities committed by the US. So sure, "just following orders" isn't a valid defense, but you won't need one anyway.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The Nuremberg trials did not happen because the Nazis were wrong. They happened because the Nazis lost the war.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Remember that in reality the US saved the top Nazis and made them head of NATO.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago

I mean we're talking about the US here which explicitly reserves the right to invade the Netherlands if any of their soldiers end up in The Hague for any reason.

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was on a camping trip. What happened?

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump is sending 2000 national guard troops to LA in response to anti-ICE protests there, over the explicit objection of Governor Newsom, who would normally be involved in any National Guard deployment in his state. The protests were mostly peaceful, and the local police were handling them, so this is entirely an effort to escalate the situation and show force against a state that doesn't want Trump interfering.

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›