this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
623 points (96.8% liked)

News

29897 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/bItmD

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 147 points 1 day ago (9 children)

after Luigi Mangione killed CEO Brian Thompson

Has he already been convicted?

Terrible headline, but I can only guess that "Business insider" would rather defend a corrupt CEO than the victim of insurance hell.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 23 hours ago

"DA says"

A little misleading without the quotation marks

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 283 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Oof he isn’t convicted but the media isn’t saying “allegedly” in headlines for him. Shows how they’re trying to sway public opinion.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago

Defense has brought it up multiple times already, it's biasing the jury pool

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Public opinion is already swayed. Luigi Mangione has become a symbol to a lot of people and as such the super-rich want to punish him.

I bet they are more scared of the symbol than they are of the thought that Mangione is innocent and the real shooter might still be free and plotting another hit.

The "real shooter" would only be one person, but a symbol has the power to create 10 or 100 more or to spark a violent rebellion and that they can't let happen.

Innocent or not, it's unfortunately Luigi Mangione they need punished in the most horrific and exemplar way possible.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

I guess he's not getting a fair trial, they'll have to jury nullify the shit out of it.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Was it supposed to be a direct quote from the DA? Even if so, it shouldn’t be in the headline.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's actually very surprising - it starts with "DA says" which is presumably their defamation defense, but usually the lawyers wouldn't let that pass.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Did they consider not being evil shitbags?

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

But the profits!!! Won't anyone think about the profits!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 16 hours ago

allegedly killed CEO Brian Thompson. Let's not forget that rather important bit.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 127 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Luigi Mangione killed CEO Brian Thompson"

Objection, baseless speculation.

[–] RandoMcRanderton@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago

Excuse me, ma'am, I'm looking for a woman that looks just like you but is a redhead. Have you seen her?

"No..."

Damn. Okay. Thanks. gunman walks off, dissapointed

"Whew, glad I dyed my hair."

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago

That sounds like a "Them" problem and has no bearing on the case Mr. DA

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Imagine how bad a bodyguard you are to take that job.

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you ever tried not being an asshole?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If that's terrorism then what do we call the death and pain caused by pursuit of profits?

If they want to have a discussion about labels, it's not gonna go well in front of a jury.

At every step defense should be asking the jury:

If you had been killed, would this be happening? Why are lives valued differently

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And not a single one of them paused and went "wait, maybe the choices we're making are the problem here?" Instead, it was "keep being evil, but now with bodyguards!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

I hope they live in fear. What a racket.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I mean the easiest solution is not to work for a hostile company and a public enemy/threat.

Those companies, and that one notoriously, kill 1000's so they are a hostile enemy, actively attacking the populace.

Now I know legalese will fancy it up, but shit smells. Can't hide it.

They had a "Guy Incognito" moment. Didn't change nothing, they are still horrible people.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

what defendant considered a deadly greed-fueled cartel," Seidemann wrote.

I mean, what are they, then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why should 40 assholes hiding from someone who is already in custody gave any bearing on his case?

My gf dyed her hair last week, must be a criminal in chains somewhere!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›