this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6127 readers
1422 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
13
I wish I was as bold as these authors. (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 2 years ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/18077383

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oddly, "bullshit" qualifies as a technical term in this context. The authors argue that chatgpt (and similar systems) emit bullshit.

They don't lie or hallucinate because they don't know or believe anything. It's all just text modeling.

The focus in this type of AI is to produce text that looks convincing, but it doesn't have any concept of truth/falsehood, fact or fiction.

When this is the way someone talks, we say that they're bullshitting us. So it is with chatgpt.

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That's not bold. Just a limited vocabulary.

[–] Sarecros@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The article uses the academically and philosophically defined term "bullshit." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit

And I'm not bullshitting, the authors mention it in the abstract.

[–] trollbearpig@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm so sick of people like you. "Oh, they may be right but they were a bit rude. So I'm going to pretend that they are wrong". Go fuck yourself if you have nothing useful to contribute. This is just a tactic trolls use in the internet to distract people, and people keep falling for it.

Plus if you actually read the article you would know that they are referencing an academic definition of bullshit. So go fuck yourself twice, you didn't even bother to read before declaring your incredible moral superiority. You are just a clown.

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Let me say this slowly for you, so you can maybe understand. I wasn't criticizing the point in the original article. I was criticizing the OP who said it was "bold."

Now, run along and argue with someone more your speed. Try 5th graders.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wow you really got him lmao. Go back to Reddit

[–] pavnilschanda@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love the term too but I wonder how it'll be used in situations where profanity is discouraged