this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
126 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7415 readers
3860 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If "due process" only applies to US citizens, then no one has due process. Because all they have to do is claim you're not a US citizen and then there's no due process by which you can refute their claim.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Yes but understanding that requires second order reasoning skills, and most Americans don't even have first order.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just got a few days ban from reddit for saying it's the people's responsibility to overthrow tyrannical governments and that there's a blurry line, but it's on the deep end when people are being detained without due process.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's because the fascists control all mainstream media, "social" and otherwise. The sooner people properly internalize the implications of that fact, the better off we'll be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

A reminder about your rights. If the government can declare you to have an attribute that negates your rights, then you have no rights.

In laymen's terms, if ICE arrests you and fast deports you, whose going to stop them? Okay but you get to a consulate in the foreign country and get back home. When you come out of your lawyer's office (because you're suing ICE), ICE arrests you again, this time as a criminal illegal alien because you came back in. They tell no one they have you, they tell no one where you are. You have no rights according to them. You are sent to an El Salvadoran prison in contravention of a court order not to deport you.

These are all things that have happened separately. We've accidently deported Americans. We've deported Americans on purpose. (Trump sent American kids away so he could deport their parents too) We've deported someone to an El Salvadoran prison in contravention of a court order.

If they don't have rights, then neither do you because the government can just declare you a member of that group and as long as the guys with guns maintain that fiction, nobody can stop them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is also why the attacks on identification documentation for transgender people should concern everyone. We used to consider ex post facto laws unconstitutional - even things like sex registry acts have been historically controversial because they were adding a punishment that had not been previously ordained.

I spent $5500 that I could not afford (as in, I ended up having to do sex work to pay for it) - to get my “irreversible and permanent” surgery that the state I lived in said would qualify to have my legal sex changed. Like, I would have preferred to wait until I was in a more financially stable situation or might not have even bothered because I didn’t even really need to bind to pass - but the drivers license with an “F” is a problem once you have a full beard.

I followed their rules, I played their games. And now they get to say, nope, doesn’t count anymore. That’s not how the law is supposed to work.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm so sorry, I don't think we live in a country subject to rule of law anymore though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’ve gotten the excuse to read both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution itself, out loud, with teenagers several times recently. Jefferson was a hypocrite and fuckwit that made money off of the back of child labor and raped the women he owned, but those words do have meaning. Any government calling itself the US that does not heed those words is not legitimate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah legitimacy is a thing so many people don't understand. And it's why they want to cloak their actions on official language and procedure. We would riot if they just disappeared people. So they make it seem like they aren't just doing that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

A reminder about your rights. If the government can declare you to have an attribute that negates your rights, then you have no rights.

Any time someone claims that some group of people should have no/reduced due process, I respond essentially the same way: "If you believe that $GROUP shouldn't have due process then you are a $GROUP_MEMBER. Prove you're not without any due process." Before this year, it was mostly people accused of sexual assault, but illegal immigrants are the new target of choice as people who allegedly don't deserve due process rights.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

..PHP developer?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Boy, what a self aware example that shows of so many of the issues on the right.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure the idea of due process extends to ensuring the government respects "certain unalienable rights" that America recognizes all people are born with--that includes non-citizens

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

If others don't have rights, you don't either.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Bitch you asked

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

unalienable

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

definition of a bad actor right there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

People like her argue in bad faith.

Shun and ostracize people like her.

Remove them from your civil social circles.

Only side eye!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Assemble a list of MAGAts. Denounce all of them as illegal aliens. At least a few of them will be deported.

Repeat ad infinitum.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It states all 'persons' not all citizens. It comes off as them not knowing this. Blatant ignorance of the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Don't care."

Not just blatantly ignorant, willfully choosing to ignore the Constitution even when confronted with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Probably a White House official then

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

ahah, but you see, to them only us citizens are persons,

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Fucking fascists

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Annie got a gun but not a brain. Without the right to due process for EVERYONE, the state can just snatch anyone they want off the street and claim the person they snatched is a member of a group that isn't entitled to due process. The person, even if they are a citizen, will have no hearing or trial, no right to contact anyone, and be whisked away to a secret prison labor camp or even a death camp. Hey Annie, I'm from the government and I've decided you look like a foreigner. No phone calls, no judge, no jury, straight to the camp with you. #Fascism #PoliceState #MagaIdiot

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That about sums it up. They don't believe the outgroup deserves rights. But if the outgroup doesn't have rights nobody does, they're just privileges that can be taken away at any time

And, it should be noted, the purpose of due process includes to check if these people are breaking any rules and if they're supposed to be here as well as if they're citizens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

All of that without grasping that they, themselves- are members of an outgroup that won't always have influence. Assuming democracy can make a come back and something changes in the next election they may find themselves in that "unpopular" group. Bet they'd change their tune for the 37th time in that case.

load more comments
view more: next ›