Both are gross
dnick
Everyone can afford experiences. Experiences don't have to be a trip abroad or jumping from hobby to hobby.
There are people with legitimate obstacles that prevent them from doing even the simplest enrichment activities, but exploring the world around you, asking questions about things you take for granted, seeing how long you can hold your breath, try a yoga pose, count your steps on the way to work and try estimating how many steps it will take you to go to the shop down the street... Opportunities for experiences are effectively unlimited.
Most groups like this don't have to be wrong about the data to be wrong about the interpretation. Did you know that on average, a person has one fallopian tube? That most crimes happen when I've cream sales are highest?
Making new friends as an adult and finding a girlfriend when you're looking for one are two of the hardest things you'll do in life. Take care of yourself and try finding things that interest you, but get out there and interact. Talk to people with the intention that an interaction is worthwhile even if it's only in passing. Take some classes to learn something, not to pick a girl to home in on. Probably 90% of relationships people have are accidental or friend of a coworker or someone who noticed you actively involved in something that doesn't have anything to do with what you're actually doing.
That cigar looks like it was photoshopped in, but willing to bet he thinks it makes him look like a stud
The prevalence of good cell phone camera was the death of so many ufo reports. Wonder when ai will usher in their rebirth.
Absolutely, you stop measuring the passage of time in days and years and start measuring it in experiences. When you're young and everything is new it's absolutely full. The 10th or hundredth time you've done something you handle it more easily but it also starts to seem like one 'thing'.
Routine is the quickest way to looking back on life and feeling like it was the blink of an eye.
I'm sure it will get there, but the biggest issue i see with the current models and implementations is that without good, or in some cases excellent, guidance, most can't handle anywhere near a full codebase and even the best models are happy to take your question about fixing any particular task you throw at them back to square one with no regard towards how the existing platform is set up. Even for a relatively light codebase that it is currently building, it's happy to scrap it start over in order to solve whatever potentially poorly worded issue you're trying to track down. And that's not even taking into account how quickly it can go from trying to solve an issue to nerfing tests in order to pass. Frustrated that things are no longer passing an expected integer test? Easily solved by allowing floats or nulls to count as passes, and damn if that isn't a process to correct three issues deep after you've 'validated' that issue and it's now being discovered down the line.
Fair points, though i disagree on the majority of objectively bad content being harmless. Anything on the Internet that leads people to feeling marginalized or ashamed or less than someone else is harmful. Even weight loss and beauty product ads are harmful in measurable ways. Having popularity and young kids looking up to you and using that admiration to to put people down and normalizing it is the worst kind of character and just because it's freedom of speech and some content creators don't do it still results in something equating to a cesspool where the less thoughtful creators can thrive.
Quite a lot different there. At Chernobyl the safety measures failed after several human errors, but the failure was still unintentional. In Israel, the devastation is either intentional or so close to intentional that it's difficult to even guess at an AI breakdown. The Chernobyl moment for AI will be when someone is trying to use it for something good or benign and it's actions will start to go in a dangerous direction, and continues despite human attempts to stop it. Your current situation would be analogous is the operator at Chernobyl were trying to initiate a meltdown and succeeded and the tools they used were maybe just a little more efficient than intended.
I think it's close to equal parts jealousy and legitimate distaste for rewarding popularity for popularity sake. So much of the toxic behavior of the popular cliche in high school makes it into the environment that it dilutes the legitimate utilization of the platform for making actually good content.
That, and the possibly justifiable hated for what some people are now considering, by extension, 'good content' when it all just ends up being reaction videos and meta content about content about content to the point where it's just a bunch of rich assholes acting like rich assholes and that's literally the content.
Honestly the worse trend I've seen are the channels that are effectively 'bum fights' with marginally less crude concepts. Let's see how humiliated we can make my friends act for a tiny bit of money compared to how much I'm making is not, and has never been, a nice thing to do, and the platform has turned it into a lucrative job.
This isn't actually real, right?
Exactly, you weren't recognized 10 years ago, why do you want us to start being understanding now that you aren't hiding it!