this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
56 points (95.2% liked)

Buy European

8716 readers
185 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42211261

Nato chief says continent cannot afford to replace American security umbrella

WTF Mark!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It is going to be kind of expensive for the EU to replace the non-expeditionary capabilities of the US military. There are also some parts, like a nuclear umbrella, which are going to need to be worked out.

It isn't impossible, but it is going to be pretty expensive and a lot of it should be built at the supernational level, preferably the EU.

[โ€“] huppakee@piefed.social 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The thing is, it will not likely get any cheaper while it will likely be become more necessary.

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 6 days ago

Yeah, I agree.

One thing that would help is defining European defense policy. I feel like a lot of countries are spending money without a target for what they should be trying to build.

[โ€“] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

France have enough nuclear weapons to start judgement day so I don't see the point.

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, France has it. The question is how it gets used to protect the rest of Europe.

[โ€“] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You don't use it, that's the point. The moment someone fires one it's end of world situation.

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 days ago

You don't use it, but you need to be able to use it for the threat to be credible.