this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
371 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7234 readers
623 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Honestly I’ve been using AI for coding like copilot and I’ll ask ChatGPT for things etc… I always felt like I was having a major productivity boost - and sometimes I do! But I swear lately models have just been getting worse and producing incorrect results and just being slow. Either I’m expecting more of them or the are really getting worse

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah that's the problem, because apparently it definitely feels like a productivity boost, but it turns into a 10% productivity decrease in the long term from debugging and fixing. I'm not going to look up the article which was maybe about a year old? so you can take that with as much salt as you like.

[–] expr@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

That's how it works. It has a fairly profound psychological effect on people where they can easily be convinced that it's beneficial, when the actual reality is that we have absolutely no evidence of that being the case. On the contrary, we have a growing body of evidence that it has a great deal of negative effects, like decreasing productivity, cognitive decline, widespread social issues arising from their use, and more.

As to your point, they haven't actually fundamentally changed at all since the original transformer model paper was written in 2017. The only thing that has changed over time is the number of parameters and the datasets (that is, vacuuming up and stealing all content on the internet). But it does the same thing as it's always done, which is simply generate the next token by taking the token with the greatest probability across a probability distribution created from the combination of the tokens it's seen before. Note that this is simply a maximum, so if all of the tokens in the distribution have a low probability, it will still take the max, resulting in hallucinations, fabrications, illogical conclusions, and so forth. That has not, and quite simply cannot, change. You would need a fundamentally different technology for that, and quite frankly, one that exists purely in the realm of science fiction.