this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
366 points (91.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5005 readers
1114 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You said yes, any amount of force is acceptable.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite. You shortened the phrase. You dropped five critical words that were present in the original phrase:

and any level of force necessary to end that harm

Further, you're dishonestly relying on a colloquial definition of "harm", rather than a legal one. "Rejection" does not qualify.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I used what was necessary for the reference, I assumed you didn't need the entire quote.

Are we at the 'define your terms' stage of the conversation, then, or are you starting to probe with the plausibly deniable personal attacks?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We're at the point of the conversation where you recognize her actions in these specific circumstances were at least understandable, if not reasonable and rational. We're at the point of the conversation where you acknowledge she was the victim. We're at the point in the conversation where you acknowledge the school failed to properly supervise her and her harasser on the bus, and erred greatly in their disciplinary action.

We're at the point where you point out that violence is not acceptable, but that given his actions and the multiple failures of the school pushed her to do something that she would not normally do, and should not have been punished for.

We're at the point in the conversation where you recognize you have been improperly assigning excessive blame to the victim, and decide to delete, or at least amend your previous arguments to portray yourself as a reasonable person.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So cede to your position even though I disagree, with good reason? Almost all those things you ask for are things I've never denied or refuted. Perhaps you should have asked to confirm your assumptions before continuing to argue against things I never argued for.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

Perhaps you should stop blaming the victim.