‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
If you didn't make it to your freshmen year without learning what Marxism is, you probably shouldn't be in Uni
Yes, most educated US Americans learn about Marxism at some point in high school (or earlier)
The fuck are you yelling about. That doesn't make sense. Obviously it could be read from the assignment paper. Otherwise, it wouldn't be read by the students. Which, the article made very clear, it was read by the students.
Yeah, I read that. And I read nothing that described how that's possible. So, no, obviously the students could see it.
That claim makes no sense.
Dude, the way you dig that hole for yourself is impressive. Not good, but impressive.
Maybe you need to learn to think critically?
I think you may legit need adult education classes or something. I literally explained how it works in my last comment.