this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
455 points (99.8% liked)

Buy European

5229 readers
1896 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42020156

Can Canada create a food labeling system similar to this?

It's confusing trying to buy Canadian with all the variations of made in, assembled in, grown in, packaged in, etc. Can we copy the Australian food labeling system, perhaps replacing the kangeroo with a maple leaf? I find this much clearer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Haha no, but we have NutriScore where sweetened Nestle products get an A, frozen pizza gets a B and cheese gets an F.

[โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (5 children)

...that's not how those work.

If a frozen pizza gets a B that means compared to OTHER frozen pizzas it has a higher nutritional value.

It compares similar products for nutritional value, not the overall "healthiness" of all products compared with each other.

So you can compare a salami pizza with a veggie pizza or a cereal bar with cereals, but not a strawberry yogurt with a chocolate bar, because those are not within the same product group.

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It's true but at the same time the fact that so many people get that system wrong makes me think maybe it's not that well thought through. These things need to be intuitive.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Oh yeah it's confusing labeling, I agree.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In Finland, we have "heart label" (Sydรคnmerkki). The label has text "better choice", and it's intended to inform customers about products that are good for heart health. You can find this label pretty much on any product category, including things like cookies, ice cream and pizza. You are expected to know, that the label actually means "better choice for heart health within this product category". So yea, I agree with you on that intuitive part.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I guess at least this way there's a greater incentive for companies to make their product applicable for the label

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's legit the first time I hear it, and I searched nutriscore on the internet when I first saw these odd labels, and read some article about it, so likely more research than most people.

Do you have a source for this, because my understanding of the Wikipedia page is that you're not correct, but I'm also aware of my ignorance in this topic.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Under "Goals" on the Wikipedia page.

Its goal is to allow consumers to compare the overall nutritional value of food products from the same group (category), including food products from different manufacturers.

But, I agree that it's confusing. The fact that you could miss the point of them even after skimming the Wikipedia shows how flawed their design is by not explaining it in simple terms on the label. And the Wikipedia page is also bad, why is it not mentioned in the first sentence in the introduction part?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago
  • 1 here. I think it compares fats carbs and stuff. I donโ€™t think it weights by product type..
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sounds like a simple labeling update would fix the confusion. All labels should say โ€œRated B compared to other options among FOOD GROUPING.โ€

Or something. Iโ€™m sure it would be doable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It compares similar products for nutritional value, not the overall "healthiness" of all products compared with each other.

Yes, but nobody knows that, they don't teach it in school, and people just ignore it anyway because it seems unreliable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I've seen the explanation on tv once or twice but I agree, it's confusing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That sounds like the kind of system the food industry would lobby for to intentionally confuse their customers.