this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
303 points (97.8% liked)
Fuck AI
8793 readers
856 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They have multiple people annotating the same video. They look for discrepancies in how data is annotated between people. Probably most often it's annotator error. It also allows them to spot actual oddities that maybe only one person noticed. There's a lot of redundancies. I think some might have a conception of AI-bros recklessly feed raw data into LLMs and sell people the garbage-out machine. It's not that at all. The source content and the written records are validated. It goes through refinement again and again to check. Who knows how many times. I've gotten by own annotations back at much later stages for further verification. That comes after even more people have looked at it and done whatever their assignment was with the data.
This inherently has nothing to do with AI. It's mass data harvesting and refinement. It's bigger than LLMs. Whatever technologies supersede LLMs will be fed these datasets. If they do it right once, they'll never need you or any professional ever again regardless of whether LLMs ultimately flop. They won't need you for the next iteration of AI technology. In theory of course.
The business here isn't AI. It's what big tech has always been after. Data.