this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
154 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

8729 readers
1181 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports:

Less effective reports:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zero924@piefed.social 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If a driver hits someone without realizing it and drives off to continue their day, that's still legally fleeing the scene

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, but that's still based on a human that should be aware of what they're doing, even if they weren't at the time.

To me it's more like a rolling truck running someone over and continuing on down the street. Whoever was in charge of the truck should be liable for not securing it, but the truck at no point fled the scene... it has no awareness or capability to understand.

[–] King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 8 points 14 hours ago

The issue with this argument is in order for us to allow these vehicles to operate on the road they NEED to have this awareness. If they can't be aware then they shouldn't be permitted to operate. We don't allow people who's awareness is impared to legally operate on the road, why should we let computers without awareness operarate in the same conditions?

By holding them to the same(or in my preference higher) standards is the only way we have if ensuring there is accountability for the companies operating these things. They cannot be allowed to pass off that liability.