this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
-3 points (46.3% liked)

Fuck AI

8034 readers
1689 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50057615

If this wasn't enough, there's even more among the silver members, such as OpenAI and NVidia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

What's the problem? All those companies have a vested interest in not letting any of those other companies from poison-pilling the kernel. I hate corporations, but they're also the ones with the money to invest in Linux instead of Microsoft Server subscriptions.

Am I missing something?

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Linus torvalds actually wrote about this in his book just for fun. He does believe in companies contributing and that not everyone was on the same page

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  1. People are irrational. This is especially true to tech bros.
  2. Techbros are usually true believers.
  3. They need a sales pitch. What is better than putting AI slop code into a kernel trusted by billions of people?
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Re: 3: because most of those companies probably rely on Linux for their operations, while a few like Microsoft and Samsung, do have some serious conflicts of interest.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Your point would stand if any of those companies had recently shown a shred of evidence that they're capable of planning further into the future than next quarter. :(

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a bit like not letting a cat around babies because you saw it kill a rabbit once. Corporations are safe around these projects in a way they are not with their own proprietary code.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in the case of microsoft, it's like not letting a cat around babies because you saw it scratch the baby and bite the baby and the cat said "i'm gonna eat that baby" and licks its lips and bites the baby again

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I totally get what you're saying. Microsoft engineered Embrace, Extend, Exterminate, where it would take open standards, extend them in a proprietary manner, then use their market dominance to kill the open standard. Bill Gates has definitely killed some babies.

But I'm saying it can't kill the baby if its contributing directly to an open source project that everyone has equal access to.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Android is using the Linux kernel as its base.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, I thought it originally used it as a base, then developed independently. So the Linux kernel updates find their way to android?

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not putting slop into the kernel so their servers still run without a hitch

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago

They clearly don't give a shit whether their servers stay up, though.

This has been a weird year where the cultists decided that don't need to keep normies around to steer their servers farms.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tech bros think the user is responsible for slop, not the AI model.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

They're just wrong lol